Intel Arc 140V Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Workstation Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the Intel Arc 140V Mobile versus the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Workstation. The benchmark result sets for both entries are empty, and the win counters stand at zero for each side. Consequently, the comparison below relies entirely on specification-derived metrics and architectural data from the database, not on executed workload measurements.

The compute disparity is the most pronounced difference. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile delivers 3.994 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Workstation reaches 50.53 TFLOPS. That places the NVIDIA part at approximately 12.65 times the raw single-precision throughput of the Intel integrated solution. In FP16, the gap narrows slightly in ratio but remains overwhelming: the Intel part computes 7.987 TFLOPS using a 2:1 rate, while the NVIDIA part sustains 50.53 TFLOPS at a 1:1 rate. The NVIDIA GPU maintains identical throughput across FP32 and FP16, whereas the Intel GPU halves its FP32 rate to achieve its higher FP16 figure.

Pixel and texture throughput follow the same pattern. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile posts 62.40 GPixel/s and 124.8 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 reaches 269.6 GPixel/s and 789.5 GTexel/s. The pixel rate advantage for NVIDIA is roughly 4.32 times, and the texture rate advantage is roughly 6.32 times. These are derived from the listed clock rates and unit counts, not from application-level benchmarks.

Both entries share the same DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support. The database also assigns both parts the 50th percentile against all GPUs, which reflects the absence of benchmark scores rather than equivalent performance. The average benchmark score for both is zero, again indicating no recorded workload data.

The NVIDIA part's memory subsystem is fully specified: 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, with 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth and a memory clock of 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective. The Intel part uses system-shared memory with a system-dependent bandwidth figure. No capacity, bus width, or dedicated bandwidth value exists in the database for the Intel side. That makes direct memory comparisons impossible beyond the structural difference: dedicated discrete VRAM versus shared system memory.

Clock behavior also differs. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1950 MHz. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 has a base clock of 1635 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz. The NVIDIA boost clock is 457 MHz higher, and its base clock is 1335 MHz higher than the Intel base. Despite the Intel part's much lower base, its boost multiplier is 6.5 times its base, while the NVIDIA boost is only 1.47 times its base. This reflects the integrated part's aggressive power-state behavior versus the workstation card's sustained high-frequency operation.

The absence of head-to-head entries means the database cannot offer measured win margins, percentile deltas, or rival scores for either product. All conclusions in this analysis are structural and architectural, derived from the recorded specification fields.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Workstation, at 50.53 TFLOPS, versus 3.994 TFLOPS for the Intel Arc 140V Mobile. The NVIDIA part is roughly 12.65 times higher in this metric.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes. Both entries list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 uses 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: How do the pixel rates compare?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 delivers 269.6 GPixel/s, while the Intel Arc 140V Mobile delivers 62.40 GPixel/s. The NVIDIA advantage is approximately 4.32 times.

Q: Are there any recorded benchmark scores for either GPU?

A: No. Both entries have empty benchmark arrays, an average benchmark score of zero, and a 50th percentile ranking against all GPUs.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a 37 W TDP, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 has a 200 W TDP. The NVIDIA part also requires a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU, while the Intel part is an IGP with no separate power connectors.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 has 10496 shading units, compared to 1024 for the Intel Arc 140V Mobile.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile wins in power efficiency and integration simplicity. Its 37 W TDP is a fraction of the NVIDIA part's 200 W TDP. It uses system-shared memory, eliminating the need for dedicated VRAM allocation, and it requires no external power connectors. The GPU occupies an IGP slot width, meaning it fits within the processor package rather than as a separate expansion card. For compact mobile systems where thermal and power budgets are tight, the data shows a clear structural advantage: lower peak power, no discrete memory overhead, and no add-in card footprint.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Workstation wins in every raw compute and rendering metric recorded in the database. Its FP32 output is 50.53 TFLOPS versus 3.994 TFLOPS. Its FP16 output is 50.53 TFLOPS versus 7.987 TFLOPS. It has 10496 shading units versus 1024, 328 TMUs versus 64, 112 ROPs versus 32, and 82 RT cores versus 8. Its texture rate of 789.5 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 269.6 GPixel/s dwarf the Intel part's 124.8 GTexel/s and 62.40 GPixel/s. The 32 GB GDDR7 memory with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a dedicated, high-speed memory pool that the Intel part cannot match, as its bandwidth is system dependent.

For ray tracing workloads, the NVIDIA part's 82 RT cores versus 8 on the Intel part indicates a substantially higher ray tracing throughput ceiling. For tensor and AI-adjacent workloads, the NVIDIA part lists 328 tensor cores, while the Intel entry has no tensor core count recorded. The NVIDIA part also supports PCIe 5.0 x16 as its bus interface, while the Intel part is limited to an IGP bus interface. For workstation rendering, simulation, or large dataset visualization tasks, the NVIDIA part is the only one of the two with the recorded resources to handle such loads.

The Intel part wins on physical footprint: it has no recorded dimensions, length, height, or width, because it is an integrated GPU. The NVIDIA part is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm by 111 mm by 40 mm. The Intel part also wins on release recency in terms of earlier availability: it released on 2024-09-23, while the NVIDIA part released on 2025-03-17. The NVIDIA part is newer by roughly six months.

Neither part has recorded benchmark wins in the database, so the use-case split above is based entirely on the specification fields. The data indicates that the Intel Arc 140V Mobile suits low-power integrated graphics roles, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 targets high-throughput workstation tasks.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every recorded specification field. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses the Lunar Lake chip with Xe2-LPG architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm TSMC process with a 172 mm² die size. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 uses the GB203 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process with a 378 mm² die size and 45,600 million transistors. The Intel transistor count is listed as unknown; the NVIDIA transistor density is 120.6M per mm².

Clock speeds differ: Intel base 300 MHz, boost 1950 MHz; NVIDIA base 1635 MHz, boost 2407 MHz. Memory differs completely: Intel uses system-shared memory with no listed size, type, bus width, or bandwidth; NVIDIA uses 32 GB GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute unit counts differ: shading units 1024 versus 10496, TMUs 64 versus 328, ROPs 32 versus 112, RT cores 8 versus 82. The NVIDIA part has 328 tensor cores; the Intel part lists none. Pixel rate is 62.40 GPixel/s versus 269.6 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 124.8 GTexel/s versus 789.5 GTexel/s. FP32 is 3.994 TFLOPS versus 50.53 TFLOPS. FP16 is 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 50.53 TFLOPS (1:1).

TDP is 37 W versus 200 W. Slot width is IGP versus dual-slot. Power connectors are none versus 1x 16-pin. Suggested PSU is not listed for Intel versus 550 W for NVIDIA. Bus interface is IGP versus PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs are portable device dependent for Intel versus 4x DisplayPort 2.1b for NVIDIA. Dimensions are null for Intel versus 267 mm by 111 mm by 40 mm for NVIDIA. Release dates are 2024-09-23 versus 2025-03-17. Predecessors differ: HD Graphics-M for Intel, Workstation Ada for NVIDIA.

The API support is identical: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4. Both are marked as Active in production status. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded, and neither has a successor listed.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile is built on the Xe2-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M (Lunar Lake) generation. It uses a 3 nm TSMC process and a 172 mm² die. The transistor count is unknown. Its memory architecture is system shared, meaning the GPU accesses the same memory pool as the CPU, with bandwidth dependent on the host system's memory configuration. The GPU is integrated into the processor package, indicated by the IGP slot width and IGP bus interface. Its display output is portable device dependent, reflecting its mobile integration.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Workstation is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the Blackwell PRO W (x000) generation. It uses a 5 nm TSMC process and a 378 mm² die with 45,600 million transistors and a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². The GPU is a discrete workstation card with dedicated 32 GB GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus. It connects via PCIe 5.0 x16 and outputs to 4x DisplayPort 2.1b. It includes 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores, reflecting its workstation-oriented ray tracing and compute acceleration features. The Intel part has 8 RT cores and no tensor core count recorded.

The NVIDIA part's FP16 performance equals its FP32 performance at a 1:1 ratio, indicating native FP16 processing without rate reduction. The Intel part's FP16 is listed at 2:1, meaning its FP16 throughput is double its FP32 throughput. This is a fundamental architectural difference in how each GPU handles reduced-precision compute.

The NVIDIA part's memory clock is listed as 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective, while the Intel part's memory clock is listed as system shared. The NVIDIA part has a dedicated power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU, while the Intel part has no power connectors. The NVIDIA part is dual-slot with fixed dimensions; the Intel part has no dimensions because it is embedded in a mobile processor.

The production status for both is Active. The Intel part's predecessor is HD Graphics-M, and the NVIDIA part's predecessor is Workstation Ada. The Intel part has no successor recorded, and neither does the NVIDIA part. The release dates show the Intel part launched on 2024-09-23 and the NVIDIA part on 2025-03-17, making the NVIDIA part the later release by approximately six months.