Intel Arc 140T Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

The Verdict

The database places both the Intel Arc 140T Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with identical average benchmark scores of zero recorded. This suggests the two occupy similar overall standing in the current database, but their physical and architectural profiles diverge sharply. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) built for portable devices, drawing 35 W and sharing system memory. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a dual-slot discrete card with 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, a 225 W power draw, and a 550 W suggested power supply. Each device serves a fundamentally different use case. The Arc 140T Mobile fits into thin-and-light systems where space and power are constrained. The LX MAX targets desktop builds that can accommodate a 248 mm long, dual-slot card with a 16-pin power connector. Users who need dedicated memory and high throughput for sustained workloads would choose the LX MAX. Users who require graphics capability inside a compact mobile chassis would choose the Arc 140T Mobile.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different architectural lineages. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile uses the Xe-LPG+ architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, and belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake) generation. Its chip is designated Arrow Lake-H. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm process, also from TSMC, and belongs to the 7G100 generation with the chip designation 7G106.

The compute configurations differ substantially. The Arc 140T Mobile packs 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, 32 render output units, and 8 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX scales this up dramatically with 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The LX MAX does not list ray tracing cores in its specifications, while the Arc 140T Mobile includes them. Neither GPU lists tensor cores in the database.

Clock behavior also separates the two. The Arc 140T Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2350 MHz. The LX MAX records no base or boost clock values, instead listing only a memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The memory subsystem is where the largest structural difference emerges. The Arc 140T Mobile uses system shared memory, meaning its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all system dependent. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc's memory bandwidth is listed as system dependent, whereas the LX MAX has a fixed, dedicated figure.

The API support shows both cards reaching DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. They differ in Vulkan support: the Arc 140T Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs also differ. The Arc 140T Mobile lists portable device dependent outputs, reflecting its integrated nature. The LX MAX provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a connections.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark entries for these two GPUs, and neither device has individual benchmark scores or nearest rivals listed. The comparison must therefore rest on the raw specification data and the calculated throughput figures provided in the database.

The pixel rate favors the LX MAX decisively. The LX MAX delivers 192.0 GPixel/s, while the Arc 140T Mobile manages 75.20 GPixel/s. This puts the LX MAX roughly 2.55 times ahead in pixel throughput. Texture rate shows a similar gap. The LX MAX reaches 384.0 GTexel/s, while the Arc 140T Mobile achieves 150.4 GTexel/s, giving the LX MAX approximately 2.55 times the texture fill rate.

The floating-point performance gap is the widest. The LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, versus 4.813 TFLOPS for the Arc 140T Mobile. That places the LX MAX about 5.1 times ahead in raw single-precision throughput. The FP16 figures follow the same ratio. The LX MAX reaches 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1), while the Arc 140T Mobile reaches 9.626 TFLOPS (2:1). The Arc 140T Mobile does hold an advantage in boost clock frequency, running at 2350 MHz compared to the LX MAX's unspecified boost clock, but without a listed clock for the LX MAX, no direct clock-to-clock comparison is possible.

The memory bandwidth comparison is one-sided. The LX MAX has a fixed 432.0 GB/s from its 192 bit GDDR6 interface. The Arc 140T Mobile's bandwidth is system dependent, meaning it varies with the host platform's memory configuration. In any configuration where the host system provides less than 432.0 GB/s of effective memory bandwidth, the LX MAX will have a clear advantage in bandwidth-bound workloads.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field in the database. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile uses the Xe-LPG+ architecture on a 5 nm process, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses TrueGPU on 6 nm. The Arc has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2350 MHz; the LX MAX lists no base or boost clocks, only a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Arc uses system shared memory; the LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The shading unit count is 1024 for the Arc versus 6144 for the LX MAX. Texture mapping units are 64 versus 192. Render output units are 32 versus 96. Ray tracing cores are present on the Arc (8) and absent from the LX MAX's listed specifications. The Arc's TDP is 35 W; the LX MAX draws 225 W. The Arc is an IGP with a slot width of IGP; the LX MAX is dual-slot. The Arc has no power connectors; the LX MAX uses 1x 16-pin. The Arc lists no suggested PSU; the LX MAX suggests 550 W. The bus interface is IGP for the Arc and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX MAX.

Display outputs are portable device dependent for the Arc and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for the LX MAX. The Arc supports Vulkan 1.4; the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. Physical dimensions are absent for the Arc, while the LX MAX measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The Arc released on 2025-01-12; the LX MAX released on 2026-03-16. The Arc lists a predecessor (HD Graphics-M); the LX MAX lists none. Neither device has a launch MSRP in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more raw compute power?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is roughly 5.1 times the 4.813 TFLOPS of the Intel Arc 140T Mobile.

Q: How do the memory systems compare?

A: The LX MAX has 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc 140T Mobile uses system shared memory, so its capacity, bus width, and bandwidth all depend on the host system.

Q: Can the Intel Arc 140T Mobile work in a desktop tower?

A: The Arc 140T Mobile is an IGP with a slot width of IGP, meaning it is integrated into a portable device's motherboard rather than installed as a separate card. It has no power connectors and uses portable device dependent display outputs.

Q: What power supply does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX require?

A: The database lists a suggested PSU of 550 W for the LX MAX. The card itself has a TDP of 225 W and uses a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Which GPU supports a newer version of Vulkan?

A: The Intel Arc 140T Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX have ray tracing cores?

A: The database does not list ray tracing cores for the LX MAX. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile includes 8 ray tracing cores in its specifications.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc 140T Mobile wins in portability and system integration. It is an IGP with a 35 W TDP, which makes it suitable for compact mobile devices where discrete cards cannot fit. Its 300 MHz base clock and 2350 MHz boost clock give it a defined clock profile, and its portable device dependent display outputs indicate it is designed to drive the built-in displays of laptops or similar hardware. The Vulkan 1.4 support gives it a slightly newer API version than the LX MAX's Vulkan 1.3. Its lower power draw means it requires no power connectors and no suggested PSU, simplifying system design. The 8 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced workloads, a feature the LX MAX does not list.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins decisively in raw throughput and dedicated memory. Its 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs dwarf the Arc 140T Mobile's 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The FP32 performance of 24.58 TFLOPS is over five times the Arc's output. The 12 GB GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a fixed, high-bandwidth memory pool that the Arc's system shared memory cannot match in most host configurations. The 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate are both roughly 2.55 times the Arc's figures. The LX MAX also offers four dedicated DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, enabling multi-monitor desktop setups, and connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 for direct motherboard integration.

For sustained, high-resolution rendering or compute workloads, the recorded data points to the LX MAX as the stronger device. For integrated graphics in a power-constrained mobile system, the Arc 140T Mobile is the only one of the two that fits that role. The database shows no benchmark wins for either device, so the verdict rests on the specification sheet alone. The LX MAX's dedicated memory, higher throughput rates, and larger compute configuration make it the clear choice for desktop performance. The Arc 140T Mobile's 35 W power envelope and IGP form factor make it the clear choice for portable systems.