Intel Arc 130V Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for this pairing, and neither GPU has accumulated an average benchmark score. The wins ledger shows zero victories for each part, which means there is no measured performance data to separate them empirically. Both products sit at the 50th percentile versus all GPUs in the database, a neutral position that reflects the absence of scoring rather than any equivalence in capability.

Without benchmark results, the only quantitative comparison available comes from the specification sheets. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, which is 7.4 times the 3.315 TFLOPS recorded for the Intel Arc 130V Mobile. Texture rate follows the same pattern: the LX ULTRA produces 384.0 GTexel/s versus 103.6 GTexel/s for the Intel part, a 3.7x advantage. Pixel rate favors the LX ULTRA by a similar margin, 192.0 GPixel/s compared to 51.80 GPixel/s.

The Intel Arc 130V Mobile holds no measured wins in any category because the database contains no benchmark scores for either product. The specification comparison does show areas where the Intel part is not disadvantaged, such as API support. Both cards expose DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel GPU supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech part lists Vulkan 1.3, a minor version advantage for Intel.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. Intel's Arc 130V Mobile uses the Lunar Lake chip with the Xe2-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M generation. Lisuan Tech's LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip with the TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation. These are unrelated designs with distinct implementation strategies.

Manufacturing processes differ: Intel builds the Arc 130V on a 3 nm node at TSMC, while Lisuan Tech uses a 6 nm node, also at TSMC. The die size for Intel is 172 mm², while Lisuan Tech's die size is not recorded in the database. Transistor counts are unknown for both.

The Intel part integrates 896 shading units, 56 texture mapping units, and 28 ROPs. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA scales much higher with 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Intel includes 7 ray tracing cores; the LX ULTRA has no ray tracing core count listed. Neither product lists tensor cores.

Clock behavior diverges sharply. The Intel Arc 130V Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1850 MHz. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no base or boost clock entries in the database; its memory clock is fixed at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate. Intel's memory clock is listed as System Shared, meaning it depends on the host system's RAM.

Memory architecture separates the two fundamentally. Intel uses system-shared memory with a system-shared bus width and bandwidth that is system dependent. Lisuan Tech equips the LX ULTRA with 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a decisive difference for workloads that demand large, fast local memory pools.

Power and physical design also differ. The Intel Arc 130V Mobile has a 37 W TDP and is an integrated GPU (IGP) with no slot width, power connectors, or suggested PSU. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA draws 225 W, occupies a dual-slot form factor, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and lists a 550 W suggested PSU. It is a PCIe 4.0 x16 add-in card, whereas Intel's part uses an integrated bus interface.

Display outputs reflect their intended roles. The Intel GPU's outputs are portable device dependent, meaning they follow the host laptop or handheld. The LX ULTRA provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs for desktop multi-monitor setups.

Release timing places the Intel part earlier. The Arc 130V Mobile launched on 2024-09-23, while the LX ULTRA arrived on 2026-03-16. Intel's product succeeds HD Graphics-M; Lisuan Tech lists no predecessor. Both are marked as Active in production status.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA records 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is approximately 7.4 times the 3.315 TFLOPS delivered by the Intel Arc 130V Mobile.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have, and what type?

A: The Intel Arc 130V Mobile uses System Shared memory with a system-dependent bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Are these GPUs comparable in physical size and power requirements?

A: No. The Intel part is an integrated GPU with a 37 W TDP and no slot width or power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is a dual-slot add-in card with a 225 W TDP, a 16-pin power connector, and a 550 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which GPU supports newer graphics APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel Arc 130V Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA lists Vulkan 1.3.

Q: When did each product launch?

A: The Intel Arc 130V Mobile launched on 2024-09-23. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA launched on 2026-03-16.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units and texture units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units and 192 TMUs. The Intel Arc 130V Mobile has 896 shading units and 56 TMUs.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification category.

Process node: Intel uses 3 nm, Lisuan Tech uses 6 nm. Both are fabricated by TSMC. Intel's die size is 172 mm²; Lisuan Tech's die size is unknown.

Shading units: Intel has 896, Lisuan Tech has 6144. TMUs: Intel has 56, Lisuan Tech has 192. ROPs: Intel has 28, Lisuan Tech has 96. Ray tracing cores: Intel has 7, Lisuan Tech has none listed.

Clocks: Intel's base is 300 MHz with a boost of 1850 MHz. Lisuan Tech has no base or boost clocks recorded. Memory clock: Intel is System Shared, Lisuan Tech is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory: Intel uses System Shared size, type, bus width, and bandwidth. Lisuan Tech uses 24 GB GDDR6, 192-bit bus, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Pixel rate: Intel is 51.80 GPixel/s, Lisuan Tech is 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate: Intel is 103.6 GTexel/s, Lisuan Tech is 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32: Intel is 3.315 TFLOPS, Lisuan Tech is 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16: Intel is 6.630 TFLOPS (2:1), Lisuan Tech is 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

TDP: Intel is 37 W, Lisuan Tech is 225 W. Slot width: Intel is IGP, Lisuan Tech is Dual-slot. Power connectors: Intel has none, Lisuan Tech has 1x 16-pin. Suggested PSU: Intel has none, Lisuan Tech lists 550 W.

Bus interface: Intel is IGP, Lisuan Tech is PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs: Intel is Portable Device Dependent, Lisuan Tech is 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Vulkan support: Intel is 1.4, Lisuan Tech is 1.3. DirectX and OpenGL versions match.

Release date: Intel is 2024-09-23, Lisuan Tech is 2026-03-16. Predecessor: Intel lists HD Graphics-M, Lisuan Tech lists none.

Dimensions: Intel has no length, height, or width recorded. Lisuan Tech measures 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows two GPUs built for entirely different use cases. The Intel Arc 130V Mobile is an integrated solution with a 37 W TDP, system-shared memory, and a 3 nm process. It is designed to fit inside portable devices where power draw and physical footprint are constrained. Its 896 shading units and 3.315 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are modest by desktop standards but appropriate for an IGP.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is a high-power desktop add-in card. Its 225 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, 16-pin power connector, and 550 W suggested PSU place it in the performance desktop segment. The 24 GB of GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 6144 shading units give it a massive resource advantage on paper. Its 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput is the dominant figure in this comparison.

Benchmark results are absent for both parts, so the verdict rests on specifications alone. For a portable device that needs basic graphics capability within a 37 W envelope, the Intel Arc 130V Mobile is the only viable option. For a desktop system with room for a 268 mm dual-slot card and a 550 W PSU, the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA offers far higher compute, memory capacity, and bandwidth.

There is no overlap in their target environments. The Intel part cannot match the LX ULTRA's raw numbers, and the LX ULTRA cannot fit into the thermal and physical constraints of a portable device. The data supports a straightforward choice based on form factor and power budget.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 figure of 24.58 TFLOPS dwarfs the Intel part's 3.315 TFLOPS. Texture and pixel fill rates follow the same direction: 384.0 GTexel/s versus 103.6 GTexel/s, and 192.0 GPixel/s versus 51.80 GPixel/s. The LX ULTRA also wins on memory capacity and bandwidth, with 24 GB of GDDR6 at 432.0 GB/s compared to Intel's system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

The Intel Arc 130V Mobile wins in efficiency and integration. Its 37 W TDP is far below the LX ULTRA's 225 W, making it suitable for laptops and handheld devices. It uses no external power connectors and requires no dedicated PSU. The 3 nm process node is more advanced than the 6 nm node used by Lisuan Tech. Intel also holds a minor API advantage with Vulkan 1.4 support versus Vulkan 1.3 on the LX ULTRA.

The LX ULTRA wins on memory type and bus width. Dedicated GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus provides predictable, high-bandwidth access that does not depend on host system memory. Intel's System Shared memory is flexible but variable in performance based on the host platform.

The Intel part wins on release timing and lineage. It launched on 2024-09-23 and has a recorded predecessor, HD Graphics-M, indicating a known product evolution. The LX ULTRA launched later on 2026-03-16 with no predecessor listed.

The LX ULTRA wins on physical configurability. It offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs for multi-monitor setups, while Intel's outputs are portable device dependent. The LX ULTRA also has a defined physical footprint of 268 mm by 112 mm by 40 mm, suitable for standard desktop cases.

The Intel part wins on power connector requirements. It needs none, while the LX ULTRA requires a 16-pin connector and a 550 W suggested PSU. For systems without high-wattage power supplies, the Intel IGP is the only option between the two.