Intel Arc 130V Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc 130V Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. Both entries carry an average benchmark score of 0 and an empty benchmark array, indicating that no standardized performance measurements have been captured for either device in the database. The head-to-head benchmark field is also empty, and the win counters for each side remain at 0.

Without benchmark scores, the comparison must rely on the raw architectural specifications recorded for each GPU. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers a peak FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS, while the Intel Arc 130V Mobile reaches 3.315 TFLOPS. This places the Lisuan part at roughly 7.4 times the raw compute throughput of the Intel part in single-precision workloads. In FP16 performance, the Lisuan GPU records 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 6.630 TFLOPS (2:1) for the Intel GPU, again a substantial margin.

Pixel throughput shows a similar pattern. The LX 7G100 achieves 192.0 GPixel/s, while the Arc 130V Mobile records 51.80 GPixel/s. Texture fill rates differ as well: 384.0 GTexel/s for the Lisuan part versus 103.6 GTexel/s for the Intel part. These figures indicate that the Lisuan Tech GPU holds a clear advantage in fill-rate-bound workloads, which typically include high-resolution rasterization and texture-heavy scenes.

Memory bandwidth also favors the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 decisively. It uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc 130V Mobile relies on system shared memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. This means the Intel GPU's memory throughput varies with the host system's configuration, while the Lisuan part offers a fixed, dedicated bandwidth figure.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is positioned for workloads that demand high absolute compute throughput and dedicated memory resources. Its 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units provide a large execution resource pool. The 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and large datasets without relying on system memory. The 225 W TDP and dual-slot cooler with a single 8-pin power connector indicate a discrete, high-power design intended for sustained performance.

The Intel Arc 130V Mobile is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 37 W TDP. It uses system shared memory and has a system-dependent bandwidth profile. Its 896 shading units, 56 TMUs, and 28 ROPs are a fraction of the Lisuan part's resources. However, the Intel GPU includes 7 ray tracing cores, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 lists no ray tracing cores in its specifications. This gives the Intel part a feature-level advantage in ray-traced content, provided the workload fits within its memory and compute limits.

The Intel GPU supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan part supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part uses a 3 nm TSMC process node, while the Lisuan part uses a 6 nm TSMC node. The Intel die size is 172 mm²; the Lisuan die size is unknown.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc 130V Mobile is built on the Lunar Lake chip using the Xe2-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M (Lunar Lake) generation. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 172 mm². The GPU operates with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1850 MHz. Its memory subsystem is entirely system shared, meaning capacity, type, bus width, and bandwidth all depend on the host platform.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with the TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation. It is manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process, with die size listed as unknown. Clock specifications for base and boost are not recorded. The memory configuration is fixed: 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit interface running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The Intel part has 896 shading units, 56 TMUs, and 28 ROPs, along with 7 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan part has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. The Intel GPU reports FP32 performance of 3.315 TFLOPS and FP16 of 6.630 TFLOPS (2:1). The Lisuan GPU reports 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Power and physical design differ sharply. The Intel Arc 130V Mobile has a 37 W TDP, an IGP slot width, and no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, a dual-slot cooler, a single 8-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The Lisuan card measures 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width. Display outputs are four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors on the Lisuan part; the Intel part's outputs are portable device dependent.

Release timing also differs: the Intel Arc 130V Mobile was released in September 2024, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 carries a June 2026 release date. The Intel part lists a predecessor of HD Graphics-M, with no successor specified. The Lisuan part lists neither predecessor nor successor. Production status for both is active.

The Verdict

The data indicates two devices with fundamentally different design goals. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a large, power-hungry discrete GPU built for maximum throughput. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 12 GB dedicated frame buffer make it suitable for compute-heavy rendering, high-resolution gaming, and workloads that require consistent, dedicated memory performance. The 225 W TDP and dual-slot form factor confirm that it is intended to be installed in a desktop system with adequate power delivery.

The Intel Arc 130V Mobile is a low-power integrated GPU for portable systems. Its 37 W TDP and IGP slot width mean it draws from the host platform and requires no additional power connectors. The 3 nm process node and ray tracing cores provide modern features in a compact footprint, but the compute and memory resources are far smaller than the Lisuan part's.

For users selecting a GPU strictly on raw performance metrics, the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is the clear choice based on the recorded specifications. It leads in every measured throughput category: FP32, FP16, pixel rate, texture rate, and memory bandwidth. For users constrained by power, space, or portability, the Intel Arc 130V Mobile offers a functional integrated solution with ray tracing support and a much lower power envelope.

Neither device has benchmark scores or rival comparisons in the database, so the verdict rests on specification analysis alone. The Lisuan part's 7.4x FP32 advantage and 3.7x pixel rate advantage over the Intel part are the defining numerical differences.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 records 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), while the Intel Arc 130V Mobile records 3.315 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.630 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Q: How do the memory subsystems compare?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc 130V Mobile uses system shared memory with bandwidth listed as system dependent.

Q: Does either GPU support ray tracing?

A: The Intel Arc 130V Mobile lists 7 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 lists no ray tracing cores in its specifications.

Q: What are the power requirements for each?

A: The Intel Arc 130V Mobile has a 37 W TDP and uses an IGP slot with no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, a dual-slot cooler, one 8-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: What API versions does each support?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel Arc 130V Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the physical dimensions of the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 measures 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width, with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.