Intel Arc 130V Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the Intel Arc 130V Mobile versus the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER. The only benchmark score available belongs to the RTX 5080 SUPER, which posted 3,075 points in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. The Intel Arc 130V Mobile has no benchmark scores listed, so a direct numerical comparison between these two in any specific workload is impossible from the data.

What the data does show is how the RTX 5080 SUPER positions against its nearest rivals in the database. It trails the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 by 2.8 percent (quadro score 3,163 versus 3,075) and the Intel Arc Pro B60 by 3.4 percent (3,182 versus 3,075). Conversely, it leads the NVIDIA GeForce 820A by 3.1 percent (2,983 versus 3,075) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M by 3.6 percent (2,967 versus 3,075). These deltas indicate a narrow competitive band, with the RTX 5080 SUPER sitting near the middle of a cluster spanning roughly 2,967 to 3,182 points.

The RTX 5080 SUPER's percentile rank of 19 means it sits above 81 percent of all GPUs in the database in terms of that Steel Nomad score. The Arc 130V Mobile has no percentile rank assigned, as it carries no benchmark data. Without recorded scores for the Intel part, the head-to-head section remains a one-sided record: the data confirms the RTX 5080 SUPER's measured performance and its proximity to four specific rivals, but offers nothing to quantify the Arc 130V Mobile's standing.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different design philosophies. The Intel Arc 130V Mobile uses the Lunar Lake chip with Xe2-LPG architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER uses the GB203 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, also built by TSMC but on a 5 nm process. The die sizes diverge sharply: the Intel part measures 172 mm², while the NVIDIA chip spans 378 mm². Transistor counts are unknown for the Intel chip, but the RTX 5080 SUPER packs 45,600 million transistors with a density of 120.6 million per square millimeter.

The RTX 5080 SUPER carries 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. The Arc 130V Mobile has 896 shading units, 56 TMUs, and 28 ROPs. Ray tracing hardware differs as well: the Intel chip has 7 RT cores, while the NVIDIA chip has 84. The RTX 5080 SUPER also includes 336 tensor cores; the Arc 130V Mobile lists no tensor core count.

Compute throughput separates the two by an order of magnitude. The Arc 130V Mobile delivers 3.315 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 6.630 TFLOPS of FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The RTX 5080 SUPER reaches 56.28 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. Pixel and texture rates follow suit: the Intel part produces 51.80 GPixel/s and 103.6 GTexel/s, while the NVIDIA chip produces 293.1 GPixel/s and 879.3 GTexel/s.

Memory architecture is fundamentally different. The Arc 130V Mobile uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth, meaning it borrows from the host system's RAM. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth. Clock behavior also differs: the Intel chip runs at a 300 MHz base and 1850 MHz boost, while the NVIDIA chip starts at 2295 MHz base and boosts to 2617 MHz, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (32 Gbps effective).

API support matches across both: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Interface and physical design diverge. The Arc 130V Mobile is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and no dedicated display outputs (portable device dependent). The RTX 5080 SUPER is a dual-slot card with a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, a single 16-pin power connector, and outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The NVIDIA card measures 304 mm by 137 mm by 40 mm.

Where Each One Wins

From the available data, the RTX 5080 SUPER wins in every measurable performance category. Its 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 figure is roughly 17 times the Arc 130V Mobile's 3.315 TFLOPS. Its 293.1 GPixel/s pixel rate is 5.7 times the Intel part's 51.80 GPixel/s. Texture rate shows a similar gap: 879.3 GTexel/s versus 103.6 GTexel/s, a factor of about 8.5. The RTX 5080 SUPER also carries 12 times the shading units, 6 times the TMUs, 4 times the ROPs, and 12 times the RT cores.

The Arc 130V Mobile wins on power efficiency and integration. Its 37 W TDP is dramatically lower than the RTX 5080 SUPER's 415 W TDP. The Intel part is integrated into the processor package (IGP), requires no external power connectors, and depends on system memory, making it suitable for thin, portable devices. The RTX 5080 SUPER demands a dedicated power connection and dual-slot chassis space.

The release timeline differs as well. The Arc 130V Mobile launched on September 23, 2024, while the RTX 5080 SUPER has a release date of December 31, 2025. Both are marked as Active in production status. The Intel part's predecessor is listed as HD Graphics-M, while the NVIDIA card has no predecessor listed.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc 130V Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Lunar Lake | GB203 |

| Architecture | Xe2-LPG | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process node | 3 nm | 5 nm |

| Die size | 172 mm² | 378 mm² |

| Transistors | unknown | 45,600 million |

| Base clock | 300 MHz | 2295 MHz |

| Boost clock | 1850 MHz | 2617 MHz |

| Memory size | System Shared | 24 GB |

| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR7 |

| Memory bus | System Shared | 256 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 1.02 TB/s |

| Shading units | 896 | 10,752 |

| TMUs | 56 | 336 |

| ROPs | 28 | 112 |

| RT cores | 7 | 84 |

| Tensor cores | null | 336 |

| Pixel rate | 51.80 GPixel/s | 293.1 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 103.6 GTexel/s | 879.3 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 3.315 TFLOPS | 56.28 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 6.630 TFLOPS (2:1) | 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 37 W | 415 W |

| Slot width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | null | 1x 16-pin |

| Bus interface | IGP | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Release date | 2024-09-23 | 2025-12-31 |

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher benchmark score in the database?

A: Only the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has a recorded benchmark score: 3,075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The Intel Arc 130V Mobile has no benchmark entries.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It trails the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 by 2.8 percent and the Intel Arc Pro B60 by 3.4 percent. It leads the NVIDIA GeForce 820A by 3.1 percent and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M by 3.6 percent.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: The Arc 130V Mobile uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: How do the TDPs compare?

A: The Arc 130V Mobile has a 37 W TDP. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a 415 W TDP, a difference of 378 W.

Q: What are the compute capability differences?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 versus 3.315 TFLOPS for the Arc 130V Mobile. In FP16, the NVIDIA card achieves 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1), while the Intel part reaches 6.630 TFLOPS (2:1).

Q: When did each product launch?

A: The Intel Arc 130V Mobile launched on September 23, 2024. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has a release date of December 31, 2025.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear performance hierarchy. The RTX 5080 SUPER is the dominant part in raw compute, memory bandwidth, and rendering throughput, with its closest recorded rivals landing within a few percentage points of its Steel Nomad score. Its 24 GB GDDR7 memory, 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, and 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 place it in a completely different performance class than the Arc 130V Mobile, which relies on shared system memory and delivers 3.315 TFLOPS.

The Arc 130V Mobile's role is different. At 37 W TDP and integrated into the chip package, it targets power-constrained, portable systems where a 415 W dual-slot card with a 16-pin connector cannot fit. The Intel part's 3 nm process node and smaller 172 mm² die reflect that efficiency focus, while the RTX 5080 SUPER's 378 mm² die and 45,600 million transistors show a design prioritizing throughput over power economy.

Buyers should choose based on the use case recorded in the data. For a desktop system with space for a dual-slot card, a PCIe 5.0 x16 slot, and a 16-pin power connection, the RTX 5080 SUPER provides the only measured benchmark score in this comparison and the highest compute figures. For a portable device requiring an integrated GPU with no external power or dedicated memory, the Arc 130V Mobile is the functional option, though the database contains no performance measurements to validate its capability.

The century-scale gap in FP32, pixel rate, and texture rate means these products do not compete in the same workloads. The RTX 5080 SUPER's percentile rank of 19 confirms it sits above most GPUs in the database, while the Arc 130V Mobile has no rank at all due to missing benchmark data. The verdict follows the numbers: the NVIDIA card is the performance choice, the Intel chip is the integration and efficiency choice, and the data does not support any other conclusion.