Intel Arc 130T Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc 130T Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. Both entries carry an average benchmark score of zero and a percentile rank of 50 against all GPUs in the database, meaning neither unit has accumulated measurable performance data. Without competitive scores, a strict numerical comparison of application performance cannot be established. However, the raw specification sheets reveal a dramatic contrast in theoretical throughput. The LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is 6.2 times the 3.942 TFLOPS offered by the Arc 130T Mobile. That ratio is derived directly from the recorded figures: 24.58 divided by 3.942 equals 6.23. The pixel rate gap is similarly wide, with the LX ULTRA producing 192.0 GPixel/s against 61.60 GPixel/s on the Intel part, a 3.1x advantage. Texture rate shows the LX ULTRA at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s, a 3.1x difference as well.

The FP16 figures follow the same pattern. The LX ULTRA reaches 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) while the Arc 130T Mobile achieves 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1), making the Lisuan part 6.2 times faster in half-precision workloads. These are theoretical peak values from the database, not application-level results, so they indicate compute headroom rather than guaranteed real-world scaling. The Arc 130T Mobile does hold advantages in certain system-level areas. Its base clock of 300 MHz and boost clock of 2200 MHz are explicitly listed, while the LX ULTRA has no recorded base or boost clock values. The Intel device also supports Vulkan 1.4, whereas the LX ULTRA is limited to Vulkan 1.3. Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, so API compatibility is otherwise identical.

Memory architecture separates the two far more than any other field. The Arc 130T Mobile uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, meaning its performance scales with the host platform. The LX ULTRA carries 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). That fixed, high-bandwidth pool gives the Lisuan product a structural advantage in memory-heavy workloads, while the Intel product's shared-memory design ties its memory performance to the laptop's RAM configuration.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. Its recorded FP32 figure is 24.58 TFLOPS, compared to 3.942 TFLOPS for the Intel Arc 130T Mobile, a 6.2x difference.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: Yes. Both are listed with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support. They also match on OpenGL 4.6, but differ in Vulkan support: the Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 with a 192-bit bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc 130T Mobile uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, so no dedicated VRAM amount is specified.

Q: Are both GPUs currently in production?

A: Yes, the database lists both the Intel Arc 130T Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA as active production parts.

Q: What are the physical size differences between the two?

A: The LX ULTRA is a dual-slot card measuring 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Arc 130T Mobile is an integrated GPU (IGP) with no recorded dimensions, as it is designed for portable devices.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel fill rate?

A: The LX ULTRA. Its pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 61.60 GPixel/s for the Arc 130T Mobile, giving the Lisuan part a 3.1x advantage.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc 130T Mobile uses the Arrow Lake-H chip with the Xe-LPG+ architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake) generation. It is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip under the TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation, fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The Intel part is the newest entry in its product family, released on 2025-01-12, while the LX ULTRA is a newer product overall, with a release date of 2026-03-16. The Arc 130T Mobile lists its predecessor as HD Graphics-M, indicating a direct lineage from Intel's integrated graphics line. The LX ULTRA has no predecessor recorded.

Shader organization differs substantially. The Arc 130T Mobile contains 896 shading units, 56 texture mapping units, 28 raster operation pipelines, and 7 ray tracing cores. The LX ULTRA contains 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no ray tracing cores are recorded for it. That absence of ray tracing hardware is notable given its DirectX 12 Ultimate support, which normally includes ray tracing as a feature. The Intel part's 7 dedicated ray tracing cores give it a hardware path for ray-traced effects that the Lisuan part may need to handle through compute shaders or other means. The LX ULTRA does not list tensor cores, and neither does the Intel part, so AI acceleration hardware is not specified for either.

The Intel GPU is an integrated part with an IGP bus interface and slot width, designed to be embedded into portable devices. The LX ULTRA is a discrete, dual-slot card using PCIe 4.0 x16 and requiring an external 16-pin power connector. Display outputs also differ: the LX ULTRA provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the Arc 130T Mobile's outputs are listed as portable device dependent, meaning the host laptop determines connectivity.

Specification Differences

The power envelope separates the two dramatically. The Arc 130T Mobile draws 35 W, while the LX ULTRA is rated at 225 W, a 6.4x difference in thermal design power. The Lisuan card requires a 550 W suggested power supply and a single 16-pin connector, whereas the Intel IGP has no power connectors or suggested PSU listed because it draws from the host system. Clock behavior also differs: the Intel part lists explicit base and boost clocks of 300 MHz and 2200 MHz, while the LX ULTRA has no base or boost clock figures in the database. Memory clocks go the other way: the LX ULTRA lists 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), while the Intel part uses system-shared memory with no dedicated clock. The LX ULTRA's memory system is fully specified at 24 GB GDDR6, 192-bit bus, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc 130T Mobile's memory is system-shared with system-dependent bandwidth, so no capacity, type, or bus width is fixed.

Compute resources scale with the power and memory gaps. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Arc 130T Mobile has 896 shading units, 56 TMUs, and 28 ROPs. The Lisuan part also leads in pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s vs 61.60 GPixel/s), texture rate (384.0 GTexel/s vs 123.2 GTexel/s), FP32 (24.58 vs 3.942 TFLOPS), and FP16 (49.15 vs 7.885 TFLOPS). The only compute metric where the Intel part holds a listed advantage is ray tracing core count, at 7 cores versus none recorded for the LX ULTRA. Dimensions exist only for the LX ULTRA: 268 mm long, 112 mm tall, 40 mm wide, dual-slot. The Intel IGP has no dimensions recorded. Both parts are active in production, and neither has a launch MSRP in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins decisively in raw compute, memory capacity, and bandwidth. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth make it the stronger candidate for large-scale rendering, high-resolution texture streaming, and compute-heavy tasks such as scientific simulation or machine learning inference, assuming software can utilize its shader count. The 24 GB GDDR6 frame buffer provides headroom for datasets and scenes that would exceed the shared-memory pool of an integrated GPU. The LX ULTRA's 192 ROPs and 96 TMUs also give it a structural advantage in fill-rate-bound scenarios, such as high-resolution rasterization with heavy overdraw. Its discrete PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures dedicated bandwidth to the host, and its four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups directly.

The Intel Arc 130T Mobile wins in efficiency and integration. Its 35 W TDP is 6.4 times lower than the LX ULTRA's 225 W, making it suitable for thin-and-light portable devices where power draw and thermal output are constrained. The IGP design requires no additional power connector, no suggested PSU, and no expansion slot, so it fits into systems where a discrete card cannot. Its Vulkan 1.4 support is ahead of the LX ULTRA's Vulkan 1.3, which matters for applications targeting the latest Vulkan extensions. The 7 ray tracing cores give it a hardware feature the LX ULTRA lacks, potentially offering better ray-traced effects per watt, though the LX ULTRA's raw compute could compensate in software-based approaches. The Intel part also has explicit clock figures, indicating a fixed boost behavior of 2200 MHz, which aids in predictable performance scaling within its power budget.

For use cases, the LX ULTRA targets desktop workstations or high-performance gaming rigs where power and space are available. The Arc 130T Mobile targets integrated systems, where the host platform's memory and cooling determine final performance. The database shows no benchmark scores for either unit, so these conclusions rest on the architectural and specification records alone. The LX ULTRA's 6.2x FP32 lead and dedicated memory make it the clear choice for peak throughput, while the Arc 130T Mobile's low power draw, ray tracing cores, and newer Vulkan support define its role in portable, power-sensitive environments.