Intel Arc 130T Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Intel Arc 130T Mobile and Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 occupy opposite ends of the graphics spectrum, one an integrated solution for portable devices and the other a standalone dual-slot card with dedicated memory. The recorded data shows no direct benchmark matches between them, so the comparison rests on their architectural specifications, compute capabilities, and memory configurations.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark results for these two products. Their performance profiles must be inferred from the specification sheets. The compute throughput figures provide the clearest separation. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc 130T Mobile produces 3.942 TFLOPS. That places the LX 7G100 at roughly 6.2 times the raw FP32 throughput of the Arc 130T Mobile. In FP16 workloads, the LX 7G100 reaches 49.15 TFLOPS versus 7.885 TFLOPS for the Intel part, again a similar multiplier.

Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern. The LX 7G100 processes 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The Arc 130T Mobile manages 61.60 GPixel/s and 123.2 GTexel/s. These figures indicate the LX 7G100 operates at approximately 3.1 times the pixel fill rate and 3.1 times the texture fill rate of the Intel integrated GPU. The shading unit count reinforces this: 6144 shading units on the LX 7G100 against 896 on the Arc 130T Mobile, a 6.9 to 1 ratio. TMU counts are 192 versus 56, and ROP counts are 96 versus 28.

The memory subsystem presents an even wider gap. The LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc 130T Mobile relies on system shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent. No fixed bandwidth number exists for the Intel part, so a direct comparison is impossible, but the dedicated 432.0 GB/s figure on the Lisuan card represents a substantial advantage for memory-intensive workloads.

Neither product shows any wins in the database, as the head-to-head benchmark array is empty. The percentile versus all GPUs is 50 for both, indicating a median standing in the overall distribution, though that metric carries limited weight without actual benchmark scores.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The Intel Arc 130T Mobile uses the Xe-LPG+ architecture on an Arrow Lake-H chip, part of the Arc Graphics-M generation for Arrow Lake. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a TrueGPU architecture on the 7G106 chip, belonging to the 7G100 generation.

Process nodes differ by one generation step. Intel fabricates the Arc 130T Mobile on a 5 nm process at TSMC. Lisuan Tech builds the LX 7G100 on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The smaller node gives Intel a theoretical density advantage, though transistor counts and die sizes are unknown for both parts, so no direct density comparison is possible.

Ray tracing support marks another divergence. The Arc 130T Mobile includes 7 ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The LX 7G100 lists no ray tracing cores in its specification, suggesting it relies purely on rasterization compute. Neither product lists tensor cores, so AI acceleration features are absent from both specification sheets.

API support shows close alignment. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Vulkan versions differ slightly: the Arc 130T Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. This puts the Intel part one minor version ahead in Vulkan compatibility.

Memory architecture is fundamentally different. The Arc 130T Mobile uses system shared memory with no dedicated VRAM, meaning its bandwidth and capacity depend entirely on the host system's RAM. The LX 7G100 carries its own 12 GB GDDR6 pool with a fixed 192-bit bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. This dedicated memory operates at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate.

Clock behavior also differs. The Arc 130T Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. The LX 7G100 lists no base or boost clock figures, only the memory clock. This absence of clock data for the Lisuan card makes direct frequency comparisons impossible.

Where Each One Wins

The LX 7G100 wins in every scenario that demands raw compute throughput, high fill rates, or large memory capacity. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance suits heavy rasterization workloads, complex shader programs, and compute-driven tasks like rendering or simulation. The 12 GB GDDR6 pool with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth handles large textures, high-resolution frame buffers, and data-intensive operations without competing with the CPU for system memory bandwidth. The 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate strong performance in traditional 3D rendering pipelines.

The Arc 130T Mobile wins in power efficiency and form factor suitability. Its 35 W TDP allows integration directly into a portable device as an IGP, requiring no separate power connectors or power supply considerations. The LX 7G100 demands 225 W TDP, a 1x 8-pin power connector, and a 550 W suggested power supply. The Intel part also carries ray tracing cores, giving it a feature that the Lisuan card lacks. For applications that use DirectX ray tracing or Vulkan 1.4 features, the Arc 130T Mobile offers capability the LX 7G100 cannot match.

The dual-slot physical design of the LX 7G100 with its 294 mm length, 120 mm height, and 49 mm width requires a desktop chassis with adequate clearance. The Arc 130T Mobile has no dimensions listed, consistent with an integrated chip mounted directly on a motherboard or mobile platform.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two products:

• Architecture: Xe-LPG+ (Intel) versus TrueGPU (Lisuan Tech)
• Chip: Arrow Lake-H versus 7G106
• Generation: Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake) versus 7G100
• Process node: 5 nm versus 6 nm
• Base clock: 300 MHz versus not listed
• Boost clock: 2200 MHz versus not listed
• Memory clock: system shared versus 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
• Memory size: system shared versus 12 GB
• Memory type: system shared versus GDDR6
• Memory bus width: system shared versus 192 bit
• Memory bandwidth: system dependent versus 432.0 GB/s
• Shading units: 896 versus 6144
• Texture mapping units: 56 versus 192
• Render output units: 28 versus 96
• Ray tracing cores: 7 versus not listed
• Pixel rate: 61.60 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 123.2 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s
• FP32 performance: 3.942 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS
• FP16 performance: 7.885 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS
• TDP: 35 W versus 225 W
• Slot width: IGP versus dual-slot
• Power connectors: none versus 1x 8-pin
• Suggested power supply: none versus 550 W
• Bus interface: IGP versus PCIe 4.0 x16
• Display outputs: portable device dependent versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
• Vulkan version: 1.4 versus 1.3
• Physical dimensions: none listed versus 294 mm length, 120 mm height, 49 mm width
• Release date: 2025-01-12 versus 2026-06-17

Fields that match include manufacturer foundry (both TSMC), DirectX support (12 Ultimate 12_2), OpenGL support (4.6), production status (active), and the absence of transistor counts, die sizes, and launch MSRP values.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, while the Intel Arc 130T Mobile provides 3.942 TFLOPS FP32 and 7.885 TFLOPS FP16. The LX 7G100 offers roughly 6.2 times the FP32 throughput.

Q: How do memory configurations compare?

A: The LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 2250 MHz memory clock. The Arc 130T Mobile uses system shared memory with bandwidth described only as system dependent.

Q: Which GPU supports ray tracing?

A: Only the Intel Arc 130T Mobile lists ray tracing cores, with 7 dedicated cores. The LX 7G100 specification sheet shows no ray tracing cores.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The Arc 130T Mobile has a 35 W TDP and no power connectors, suitable for integrated use. The LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, requires a 1x 8-pin power connector, and lists a 550 W suggested power supply.

Q: How do the API support levels differ?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Arc 130T Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What physical form factors do these GPUs take?

A: The Arc 130T Mobile is an IGP with no dimensions listed, designed for portable devices. The LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card measuring 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm, using a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

The Verdict

The data points to clear selection criteria based on workload and platform. For a desktop system requiring maximum rasterization performance, high memory bandwidth, and large VRAM capacity, the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is the only viable choice. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 12 GB GDDR6 memory provide a level of compute and fill rate that the Intel part cannot approach. The dual-slot card with PCIe 4.0 x16 interface fits a traditional desktop motherboard and power supply setup.

For a portable device where power consumption, physical space, and thermal output are constraints, the Intel Arc 130T Mobile is the appropriate selection. Its 35 W TDP enables integration without external power, and its IGP form factor requires no additional chassis space. The 7 ray tracing cores provide a feature absent from the LX 7G100, and Vulkan 1.4 support offers a newer API version.

The absence of benchmark scores in the database means these conclusions rest on specification-level analysis rather than measured performance. The LX 7G100 dominates in throughput metrics, memory capacity, and bandwidth. The Arc 130T Mobile wins on power efficiency, physical integration, ray tracing capability, and Vulkan API version. Each product serves a distinct market segment, and the recorded data shows no scenario where one could substitute for the other.