Intel Arc 130T Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc 130T Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER occupy entirely different performance strata, and the data reflects this clearly. The Arc 130T Mobile, with its integrated graphics design, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its percentile ranking among all GPUs sits at 50, meaning it lands in the middle of the field, but with no actual benchmark entries, its practical performance remains unquantified in our measurements. The RTX 5080 SUPER, by contrast, has a recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075, placing it in the 19th percentile of all GPUs. That percentile figure indicates it outperforms roughly 81 percent of all recorded graphics processors, a strong position for modern gaming workloads.

The use-case split is stark. The Arc 130T Mobile is built for portable devices, with a 35 W power envelope and an integrated form factor. It is designed for systems where space and cooling are constrained, such as thin laptops or compact mini PCs. Its performance class, judged by its 896 shading units and 3.942 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, suits light gaming, media playback, and productivity tasks, but it lacks the raw throughput for demanding 3D applications. The RTX 5080 SUPER, on the other hand, is a dual-slot, 415 W discrete graphics card with a 304 mm length, 137 mm height, and 40 mm width. It targets desktop systems with robust power delivery and cooling. Its 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is over 14 times higher than the Arc 130T Mobile, and its 24 GB of GDDR7 memory with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth dwarfs the system-shared memory of the Intel part.

In terms of benchmark wins, the RTX 5080 SUPER dominates outright because it has a recorded score while the Arc 130T Mobile has none. The wins count stands at 0 for the Intel part and 0 for the NVIDIA part in head-to-head tests, but the available data shows only one side with measurable results. For users who need sustained high-frame-rate gaming at high resolutions, the RTX 5080 SUPER is the only option with evidence of capability. For users who prioritize low power draw and integrated simplicity, the Arc 130T Mobile fills that niche, though its actual performance ceiling remains unmeasured.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The Intel Arc 130T Mobile uses the Xe-LPG+ architecture built on an Arrow Lake-H chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. This is an integrated graphics solution, meaning it shares system memory and has no dedicated VRAM. The RTX 5080 SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a GB203 chip, also fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but it is a discrete GPU with its own 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus. The transistor counts reflect this disparity: the RTX 5080 SUPER packs 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The Arc 130T Mobile's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

The compute resources differ by an order of magnitude. The Arc 130T Mobile has 896 shading units, 56 texture mapping units, 28 render output units, and 7 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10,752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, and 84 RT cores. The NVIDIA part also includes 336 tensor cores, while the Intel part lists no tensor core count. Clock speeds tell a similar story: the Arc 130T Mobile runs at a 300 MHz base and 2200 MHz boost, while the RTX 5080 SUPER runs at 2295 MHz base and 2617 MHz boost. The memory subsystem is fundamentally different, with the Intel part using system-shared memory at system-dependent bandwidth, while the NVIDIA part uses dedicated GDDR7 at 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective speed.

The feature sets are comparable in API support. Both claim DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 5080 SUPER supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Arc 130T Mobile uses an integrated bus interface with no external connection. Display outputs also differ: the Intel part relies on portable device dependent outputs, while the NVIDIA card provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a dual-slot width and a single 16-pin power connector, while the Arc 130T Mobile is an IGP with no power connectors listed. The power draw difference is substantial, with the Intel part rated at 35 W and the NVIDIA part at 415 W.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the two products. The only recorded performance data belongs to the RTX 5080 SUPER, which scored 3075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The Arc 130T Mobile has no benchmark entries, so direct numerical comparison is impossible from the recorded measurements. What the data does show is the RTX 5080 SUPER's standing against its nearest rivals, which provides context for its performance level.

In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX 5080 SUPER scored 3075 points. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro P1000, scored 3163 points, which is 2.8 percent higher than the RTX 5080 SUPER. The Intel Arc Pro B60 scored 3182 points, 3.4 percent higher. On the lower side, the NVIDIA GeForce 820A scored 2983 points, 3.1 percent lower, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M scored 2967 points, 3.6 percent lower. This places the RTX 5080 SUPER in a tight cluster with these older or lower-tier cards in this specific test, despite its modern architecture and high specifications. The delta percentages indicate that the RTX 5080 SUPER is not a runaway leader in this benchmark, sitting within a few points of its nearest competitors.

The Arc 130T Mobile's absence from benchmark results means no such comparison exists for the Intel part. Its percentile rank of 50 suggests it sits at the median of all GPUs, but without a score, this rank carries no numerical weight. The RTX 5080 SUPER's 19th percentile rank, combined with its 3075 score, shows it performs above the vast majority of GPUs in the database, but its nearest rivals in this specific test are close enough that the margin is narrow.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split in intended use. The RTX 5080 SUPER is the only one of the two with recorded performance evidence, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075, along with its 19th percentile ranking, indicates it is a high-end discrete GPU for demanding workloads. Its 24 GB of GDDR7 memory, 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, and 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute give it substantial headroom for modern gaming at high settings and resolutions. The 415 W power draw and dual-slot form factor mean it requires a desktop chassis with adequate cooling and a suitable power supply.

The Arc 130T Mobile, with its 35 W TDP and integrated design, is for systems where power efficiency and compactness take priority over raw performance. Its 896 shading units and 3.942 TFLOPS are sufficient for entry-level 3D tasks, but the lack of benchmark data means its real-world performance cannot be verified from the database. Its 50th percentile rank suggests it is an average performer among all GPUs, but this is a qualitative position rather than a measured score.

Users who need a discrete graphics card for high-performance gaming or compute should choose the RTX 5080 SUPER based on the available evidence. Users who require an integrated solution for a portable or low-power device should consider the Arc 130T Mobile, but they should understand that its performance is unmeasured in the database. The RTX 5080 SUPER's nearest rivals in the 3DMark test are within a few percentage points, so its advantage over those specific cards is slim, but its overall specifications are far beyond the Intel integrated part.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Arc 130T Mobile have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the Arc 130T Mobile has no recorded benchmark entries. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile rank of 50 is based on its position among all GPUs without a specific measured result.

Q: What is the RTX 5080 SUPER's recorded benchmark score?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER scored 3075 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This places it at the 19th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in the 3DMark test?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro P1000 scored 3163, 2.8 percent higher. The Intel Arc Pro B60 scored 3182, 3.4 percent higher. The NVIDIA GeForce 820A scored 2983, 3.1 percent lower, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M scored 2967, 3.6 percent lower.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The Arc 130T Mobile uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The RTX 5080 SUPER uses 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The Arc 130T Mobile has a 35 W TDP and uses an integrated form factor with no power connectors. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a 415 W TDP and uses a dual-slot design with a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. However, the RTX 5080 SUPER uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Arc 130T Mobile uses an integrated bus interface.

Specification Differences

The table below lists only the fields where the two products differ, based on the recorded data.

| Specification | Intel Arc 130T Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER |

|----------------|----------------------|-------------------------------|

| Series | None | GeForce 50-series |

| Chip | Arrow Lake-H | GB203 |

| Architecture | Xe-LPG+ | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Generation | Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake) | GeForce 50 |

| Transistors | Unknown | 45,600 million |

| Die Size | Unknown | 378 mm² |

| Transistor Density | None | 120.6M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 2295 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz | 2617 MHz |

| Memory Clock | System Shared | 2000 MHz, 32 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 1.02 TB/s |

| Shading Units | 896 | 10752 |

| TMUs | 56 | 336 |

| ROPs | 28 | 112 |

| RT Cores | 7 | 84 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 336 |

| Pixel Rate | 61.60 GPixel/s | 293.1 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 879.3 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | 56.28 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 35 W | 415 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Dimensions | None | 304 mm length, 137 mm height, 40 mm width |

| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2025-12-31 |

| Predecessor | HD Graphics-M | None |

| Launch MSRP | None | 999 USD |

| Benchmark Score | None | 3075 (3DMark Steel Nomad DX12) |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 50 | 19 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 3075 |