Intel Arc 130T Mobile vs NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC Comparison

The Verdict

The database places these two products at opposite ends of the GPU spectrum. The Intel Arc 130T Mobile is a low-power integrated processor for portable devices, while the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC is a server-class accelerator module. The recorded data shows the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC holds a 100th percentile rank among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 369831 from the Geekbench OpenCL test. The Intel Arc 130T Mobile sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark scores in the database, leaving its average score at 0.

The Intel Arc 130T Mobile is the appropriate choice for portable systems that require integrated graphics with no separate module footprint. Its IGP slot width, system-shared memory, and 35 W TDP place it firmly in the mobile integrated segment. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC targets server deployments where compute throughput is paramount. Its 288 GB of HBM3e memory, 8.19 TB/s bandwidth, and 76.99 TFLOPS FP32 throughput define it as a data center accelerator. The data does not support any use case crossover between these two products; they serve disjoint markets.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc 130T Mobile uses the Arrow Lake-H chip based on the Xe-LPG+ architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake) generation and lists the HD Graphics-M as its predecessor. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC uses the GB110 chip based on the Blackwell Ultra architecture, also on TSMC 5 nm, but with 208,000 million transistors on a 1628 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 127.8M per mm². The Intel chip reports unknown transistor count and die size.

The Intel Arc 130T Mobile operates with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. Its memory is system shared, with bandwidth described as system dependent. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC runs at a 1665 MHz base and 2032 MHz boost, with memory at 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective). It uses 288 GB of HBM3e across an 8192-bit bus, delivering 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth.

Shading unit counts differ sharply. The Intel part has 896 shading units, 56 TMUs, 28 ROPs, and 7 RT cores. The NVIDIA part has 18944 shading units, 592 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 592 tensor cores. The Intel part lists no tensor cores, while the NVIDIA part lists no RT core count in the data. Pixel and texture rates reflect the scale difference: the Intel Arc 130T Mobile delivers 61.60 GPixel/s and 123.2 GTexel/s, while the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC delivers 48.77 GPixel/s and 1,202.9 GTexel/s.

API support differs as well. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA part lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, consistent with a server accelerator that does not target traditional graphics APIs. Display outputs on the Intel part are portable device dependent; the NVIDIA part has no outputs.

FAQ

Q: Which product has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC has an average benchmark score of 369831 from the Geekbench OpenCL test. The Intel Arc 130T Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores, leaving its average at 0.

Q: How does the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The database shows it is 7% ahead of the NVIDIA B200 (which scores 345482), 10.4% ahead of the NVIDIA H200 NVL (334891), 16.3% ahead of the AMD Instinct MI300X (317994), and 25% ahead of the NVIDIA L40S (295763).

Q: What memory configurations do the two products use?

A: The Intel Arc 130T Mobile uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC uses 288 GB of HBM3e with an 8192-bit bus and 8.19 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two products?

A: The Intel Arc 130T Mobile has a TDP of 35 W. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC has a TDP of 1100 W and lists a suggested PSU of 1500 W.

Q: What are the release dates for these products?

A: The Intel Arc 130T Mobile has a release date of 2025-01-12. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC has a release date of 2025-09-10.

Q: Do both products support the same graphics APIs?

A: No. The Intel Arc 130T Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC lists N/A for all three APIs.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Arc 130T Mobile | NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Arrow Lake-H | GB110 |

| Architecture | Xe-LPG+ | Blackwell Ultra |

| Generation | Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake) | Server Blackwell (Bxx) |

| Transistors | unknown | 208,000 million |

| Die Size | unknown | 1628 mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 1665 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz | 2032 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 288 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | HBM3e |

| Bus Width | System Shared | 8192 bit |

| Bandwidth | System Dependent | 8.19 TB/s |

| Shading Units | 896 | 18944 |

| TMUs | 56 | 592 |

| ROPs | 28 | 24 |

| RT Cores | 7 | null |

| Tensor Cores | null | 592 |

| Pixel Rate | 61.60 GPixel/s | 48.77 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 1,202.9 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 3.942 TFLOPS | 76.99 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | 76.99 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 35 W | 1100 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | SXM Module |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 6.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | N/A |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | N/A |

| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2025-09-10 |

| Predecessor | HD Graphics-M | Server Hopper |

| Successor | null | Server Rubin |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 50 | 100 |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 0 | 369831 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table in the database is empty, and the win counts are 0 for both products. The only recorded benchmark measurement belongs to the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC, which scored 369831 in Geekbench OpenCL. The Intel Arc 130T Mobile has no benchmark entries.

The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC delivers 76.99 TFLOPS FP32 compared to 3.942 TFLOPS for the Intel Arc 130T Mobile, a factor of roughly 19.5x based on the recorded figures. In FP16, the NVIDIA part achieves 76.99 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel part reaches 7.885 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. Texture rate favors the NVIDIA part at 1,202.9 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s. Pixel rate is the one raw throughput metric where the Intel part leads, with 61.60 GPixel/s versus 48.77 GPixel/s, likely due to the NVIDIA part's low ROP count of 24 compared to 28 on the Intel part.

The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC holds a 100th percentile rank across all GPUs in the database, with its nearest rival being the NVIDIA B200 at 345482 (7% lower), followed by the NVIDIA H200 NVL at 334891 (10.4% lower), the AMD Instinct MI300X at 317994 (16.3% lower), and the NVIDIA L40S at 295763 (25% lower). The Intel Arc 130T Mobile sits at the 50th percentile with no rival data recorded.

Memory bandwidth presents the starkest architectural contrast. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC accesses 288 GB of HBM3e through an 8192-bit interface at 8.19 TB/s. The Intel Arc 130T Mobile depends entirely on system shared memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. The NVIDIA part also carries 592 tensor cores, while the Intel part lists none. The Intel part includes 7 RT cores, while the NVIDIA part does not report an RT core count.

Power and physical form factor confirm the positioning. The Intel Arc 130T Mobile draws 35 W and mounts as an IGP. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC draws 1100 W, requires a suggested PSU of 1500 W, and mounts as an SXM module with a PCIe 6.0 x16 bus interface. The production status for both is listed as Active. The Intel part released on 2025-01-12, and the NVIDIA part released on 2025-09-10.

The data supports no direct performance comparison beyond the single recorded OpenCL score, because the Intel part has no benchmark entries. The percentile ranks summarize the gap: 50th percentile for the Intel Arc 130T Mobile versus 100th percentile for the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC, with a recorded average score of 369831 for the NVIDIA part and 0 for the Intel part. These two products occupy separate segments, and the recorded measurements reflect that separation.