AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. Both entries carry an average benchmark score of zero, and neither has a list of nearest rivals with comparative scores or percentile deltas. The database places both products at the 50th percentile versus all GPUs, which indicates a neutral, unranked position rather than a measured performance tier.

Without recorded benchmark deltas, the comparison must rely on the architectural and specification data captured in the database. The raw compute figures separate the two sharply. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU delivers 1.638 TFLOPS. That is a 15.0x difference in raw floating-point capacity, a gap that dominates any workload relying on shader math. The texture rate follows the same pattern: 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX MAX versus 51.20 GTexel/s for the Ryzen Z2 A GPU, a 7.5x spread. Pixel throughput shows 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX MAX against 25.60 GPixel/s for the Ryzen Z2 A GPU, a 7.5x margin as well.

Memory bandwidth also favors the LX MAX decisively. The LX MAX uses a 192-bit bus with GDDR6 at 432.0 GB/s, while the Ryzen Z2 A GPU uses a 128-bit bus with LPDDR5 at 102.4 GB/s. The LX MAX holds a 4.2x bandwidth advantage. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU does counter with 16 GB of memory versus 12 GB on the LX MAX, a 4 GB capacity lead, but the LX MAX's bandwidth advantage matters more for sustained rendering workloads.

The only area where the Ryzen Z2 A GPU posts a higher number is transistor density. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU packs 2,400 million transistors into a 163 mm² die, yielding 14.7M transistors per mm². The LX MAX has no recorded transistor count or die size in the database, so a density comparison is not possible. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU also runs at a 15 W TDP versus 225 W for the LX MAX, a 15x power draw difference that inverts the compute ratio.

The data indicates the Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins every measurable performance category except memory capacity and power efficiency. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU's 16 GB frame buffer is larger, but its bandwidth, texture rate, pixel rate, and FP32 throughput all trail by wide margins. The LX MAX's 6,144 shading units against 512 for the Ryzen Z2 A GPU, 192 TMUs against 32, and 96 ROPs against 16 reinforce the same conclusion: the LX MAX is built for far heavier rendering loads.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in compute-heavy scenarios. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 output and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 output (2:1 ratio) place it in a class suited for high-resolution rendering, heavy shader workloads, and large texture operations. The 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate the LX MAX can sustain high fill rates across multiple displays, and its 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups. The 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth feeds those compute units without stalling, and the 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer, while smaller than the Ryzen Z2 A GPU's, is paired with a 192-bit bus that moves data far faster.

The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU wins in power-constrained environments. Its 15 W TDP is a 15x reduction from the LX MAX's 225 W, making it suitable for compact systems without dedicated power connectors. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU uses a single USB Type-C output, which aligns with low-profile or embedded designs. Its 16 GB LPDDR5 memory exceeds the LX MAX's capacity by 4 GB, which benefits workloads that need larger working sets rather than higher throughput, such as certain data-parallel tasks or large asset caches. The 14.7M transistors per mm² density also shows a more efficient packing of logic, though the total transistor count of 2,400 million is far below the LX MAX's unrecorded figure.

The Ryzen Z2 A GPU's API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX MAX matches DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6 but lists Vulkan 1.3, one version behind. That minor API delta does not offset the compute gap, but it gives the Ryzen Z2 A GPU a slight edge in Vulkan feature coverage.

The LX MAX wins on expansion and integration. It offers PCIe 4.0 x16, a dual-slot cooler, a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested 550 W power supply. Physical dimensions are recorded at 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU has no recorded slot width, power connectors, suggested PSU, bus interface, or physical dimensions, so those categories cannot be compared directly.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is 15.0x higher than the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU's 1.638 TFLOPS.

Q: How do memory bandwidth and capacity compare?

A: The LX MAX has 432.0 GB/s bandwidth from 12 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU has 102.4 GB/s bandwidth from 16 GB LPDDR5 on a 128-bit bus. The LX MAX leads bandwidth by 4.2x, while the Ryzen Z2 A GPU leads capacity by 4 GB.

Q: What are the power consumption figures?

A: The Ryzen Z2 A GPU has a 15 W TDP. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a 225 W TDP and a suggested power supply of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU supports newer graphics APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the display output options?

A: The Ryzen Z2 A GPU has 1x USB Type-C. The LX MAX has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units and texture units?

A: The LX MAX has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification. The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU uses a Van Gogh chip on RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC, with 2,400 million transistors on a 163 mm² die. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses a 7G106 chip on TrueGPU architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, with unknown transistor count and die size.

Clock speeds show a partial difference. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU has a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 1600 MHz, with memory at 800 MHz (6.4 Gbps effective). The LX MAX has no recorded base or boost clock, only a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration differs completely. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU has 16 GB LPDDR5 on a 128-bit bus at 102.4 GB/s. The LX MAX has 12 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus at 432.0 GB/s.

Compute resources differ by large factors. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The LX MAX has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU includes 8 ray tracing cores; the LX MAX has no recorded ray tracing core count.

Output rates differ in kind as well as magnitude. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU posts 25.60 GPixel/s pixel rate and 51.20 GTexel/s texture rate. The LX MAX posts 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate.

Power and physical specifications differ sharply. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU has a 15 W TDP, no recorded slot width, no power connectors, no suggested PSU, no bus interface, and a single USB Type-C output. The LX MAX has a 225 W TDP, dual-slot width, a 1x 16-pin power connector, a 550 W suggested PSU, PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The LX MAX also has recorded dimensions of 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width; the Ryzen Z2 A GPU has none.

Release dates differ as well. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU was released on 2024-12-31, while the LX MAX was released on 2026-03-16. Both are listed as Active in production.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU uses the Van Gogh chip, which is based on RDNA 2.0 architecture. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip, which is based on a TrueGPU architecture within the 7G100 generation. These are fundamentally different design families.

The manufacturing process differs by one nanometer: the Ryzen Z2 A GPU uses TSMC's 7 nm node, while the LX MAX uses TSMC's 6 nm node. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU has a recorded transistor count of 2,400 million and a die size of 163 mm², giving a density of 14.7M transistors per mm². The LX MAX has no recorded transistor count or die size, so its density cannot be assessed from the database.

Compute architecture diverges in scale. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU's RDNA 2.0 design includes 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, along with 8 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX's TrueGPU architecture includes 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no recorded ray tracing cores. The LX MAX's shading unit count is 12x higher, its TMU count is 6x higher, and its ROP count is 6x higher.

Memory architecture reflects different priorities. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU pairs LPDDR5 with a 128-bit bus, which is typical of low-power integrated designs. The LX MAX pairs GDDR6 with a 192-bit bus, which is typical of discrete performance cards. The LX MAX's memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) is significantly higher than the Ryzen Z2 A GPU's 800 MHz (6.4 Gbps effective).

The FP16 capability shows a 2:1 ratio versus FP32 on both GPUs. The LX MAX posts 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 against 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, while the Ryzen Z2 A GPU posts 3.277 TFLOPS FP16 against 1.638 TFLOPS FP32. The LX MAX's FP16 output is 15.0x higher than the Ryzen Z2 A GPU's.

API support is mostly aligned. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU lists Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX lists Vulkan 1.3. The LX MAX adds a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which the Ryzen Z2 A GPU does not record. The display output architecture also differs: the Ryzen Z2 A GPU has a single USB Type-C, while the LX MAX has four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors, indicating a multi-display design.

The power architecture is the clearest differentiator. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU's 15 W TDP aligns with fanless or low-profile implementations, while the LX MAX's 225 W TDP, 16-pin connector, and 550 W suggested PSU indicate a high-draw discrete card. The LX MAX's dual-slot physical design and recorded dimensions (248 mm length, 118 mm height, 48 mm width) reinforce that it is built for standard desktop chassis, not embedded or mobile contexts.