AMD Radeon RX 9070 vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 9070 and the Intel Arc Pro B370. The head-to-head field is empty, and the Intel Arc Pro B370 has no individual benchmark scores listed in the database. This absence of comparative measurements means a direct score-by-score comparison is not possible from the available facts.

The AMD Radeon RX 9070, however, has a substantial set of recorded benchmark results. Its average benchmark score across all tests is 23877, placing it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs tracked by the database. The Intel Arc Pro B370 holds a 50th percentile position, but its average benchmark score is listed as 0 due to the lack of any recorded test results. This gap in data prevents a numerical comparison of their performance in specific workloads.

For context on the RX 9070's standing, the database lists its nearest rivals based on average scores. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24170, which is 1.2% ahead of the RX 9070. The AMD Radeon RX 6800S scores 24063, sitting 0.8% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 23736, which is 0.6% behind the RX 9070, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile scores 23628, trailing by 1.1%. These deltas show the RX 9070 clustering within a narrow performance band around the 23800 to 24200 average score range.

The RX 9070's individual benchmark results reveal its strengths. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it records a score of 6290. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 131539, while its Geekbench Vulkan score is 58705. The PassMark G3D score is 25381, and the PassMark GPU Compute score is 14737. The PassMark DirectX 9 test yields 343, DirectX 10 yields 141, DirectX 11 yields 281, and DirectX 12 yields 74. The PassMark G2D score is 1280. These figures indicate a GPU with strong compute capabilities and solid DirectX 11 performance, while the DirectX 12 PassMark result is comparatively low relative to its other scores.

Because the Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmarks, the database cannot confirm any wins for either product in a head-to-head context. The wins counters for both items are set to 0. The analysis must therefore rely on architectural specifications and the RX 9070's standalone scores to draw any meaningful conclusions.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 has an average benchmark score of 23877 across its recorded tests. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark results are recorded in the database for this product.

Q: How does the RX 9070 compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The RX 9070 sits within 1.2% of its nearest rivals. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER leads by 1.2%, the AMD Radeon RX 6800S leads by 0.8%, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z trails by 0.6%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile trails by 1.1%.

Q: What is the transistor count and process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 uses 53,900 million transistors on a 4 nm TSMC process with a die size of 357 mm². The Intel Arc Pro B370 has an unknown transistor count and die size, but it uses a 3 nm Intel process node.

Q: What memory configurations do these GPUs use?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, with its type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both the AMD Radeon RX 9070 and the Intel Arc Pro B370 support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for each product?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 has a launch MSRP of 549 USD. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no launch MSRP listed in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture using the Navi 48 chip, part of the Navi IV generation within the RX 9000 series. It is manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process, with 53,900 million transistors packed into a 357 mm² die. The transistor density calculates to 151.0M per mm². Its predecessor is the Navi III generation.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture with the Panther Lake chip, belonging to the Arc Graphics-WM generation. It is manufactured by Intel on a 3 nm process, though its transistor count and die size are unknown. Its predecessor is the HD Graphics-WM generation.

The RX 9070 features a substantial shading unit count of 3584, paired with 224 texture mapping units and 128 ROPs. It includes 56 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. This represents a 3:1 ratio in shading units, favoring the RX 9070.

Clock speeds differ significantly between the two. The RX 9070 has a base clock of 1330 MHz and a boost clock of 2520 MHz, with a game clock of 2070 MHz. The Arc Pro B370 runs at a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The RX 9070's memory clock is 2518 MHz, translating to 20.1 Gbps effective, while the Arc Pro B370's memory clock is tied to the system.

Pixel and texture rates reflect the core count differences. The RX 9070 achieves 322.6 GPixel/s and 564.5 GTexel/s, while the Arc Pro B370 achieves 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. Floating point performance shows the RX 9070 at 36.13 TFLOPS for FP32 and FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, indicating a different FP16 handling approach.

Power characteristics are dramatically different. The RX 9070 has a TDP of 220 W, uses dual-slot cooling, requires 2x 8-pin power connectors, and suggests a 550 W PSU. The Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W, is an IGP with no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU requirement. The RX 9070 connects via PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Arc Pro B370 uses an IGP bus interface.

Display outputs also differ. The RX 9070 offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a. The Arc Pro B370's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, reflecting its integrated nature.

The Verdict

The recorded data paints a clear picture of two products aimed at fundamentally different segments. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is a discrete, high-performance GPU with a 220 W TDP, 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, and a comprehensive benchmark profile showing an average score of 23877. Its 69th percentile ranking among all GPUs, combined with its closest rival deltas of under 1.2%, positions it as a mid-to-high tier performer in the database's tracking.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated GPU with a 25 W TDP, no dedicated memory, and no recorded benchmark results. Its 50th percentile ranking appears to be a default placement rather than a measured outcome, as its average score is 0. The Xe3-LPG architecture on a 3 nm process indicates a focus on efficiency and integration rather than raw performance.

For users requiring dedicated graphics performance, the RX 9070 is the only option with measurable data. Its FP32 throughput of 36.13 TFLOPS and 644.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth are the kind of specifications that support demanding workloads. The Arc Pro B370, with system shared memory and 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, serves a different purpose entirely, likely for portable or low-power devices where the IGP designation and lack of power connectors are defining traits.

The data does not support a direct performance comparison due to the missing benchmarks for the Arc Pro B370. The verdict from the available facts is that the RX 9070 is a validated, measured performer, while the Arc Pro B370's capabilities remain unquantified in the database.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification field.

Process and Manufacturing: The RX 9070 uses a 4 nm TSMC process with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die. The Arc Pro B370 uses a 3 nm Intel process with unknown transistor count and die size.

Architecture: The RX 9070 uses RDNA 4.0 with the Navi 48 chip. The Arc Pro B370 uses Xe3-LPG with the Panther Lake chip.

Clock Speeds: The RX 9070 has a base clock of 1330 MHz and a boost clock of 2520 MHz. The Arc Pro B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz.

Memory: The RX 9070 has 16 GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Core Configuration: The RX 9070 has 3584 shading units, 224 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 56 RT cores. The Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores.

Performance Rates: The RX 9070 delivers 322.6 GPixel/s and 564.5 GTexel/s. The Arc Pro B370 delivers 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s.

Compute Throughput: The RX 9070 achieves 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 and 36.13 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1). The Arc Pro B370 achieves 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Power: The RX 9070 has a 220 W TDP, is dual-slot, uses 2x 8-pin connectors, and suggests a 550 W PSU. The Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP, is an IGP, uses no connectors, and has no PSU suggestion.

Bus Interface: The RX 9070 uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The Arc Pro B370 uses IGP.

Display Outputs: The RX 9070 offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a. The Arc Pro B370's outputs are portable device dependent.

Release Date: The RX 9070 launched on 2025-03-05. The Arc Pro B370 launched on 2026-01-26.

Benchmark Data: The RX 9070 has 10 recorded benchmark scores and an average of 23877. The Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmarks and an average of 0.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 wins in every category where measurement exists. Its benchmark scores, while not directly comparable to the Arc Pro B370 due to missing data, establish a baseline of verified performance. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 14737 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 131539 indicate strong general compute capabilities. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 provides evidence of DirectX 12 gaming performance, and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 58705 suggests solid Vulkan support.

The RX 9070 wins on memory bandwidth with 644.6 GB/s versus the system dependent bandwidth of the Arc Pro B370. It wins on raw compute with 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 versus 6.144 TFLOPS. It wins on pixel throughput at 322.6 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s, and texture throughput at 564.5 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s. Its dedicated 16 GB of GDDR6 memory provides 256-bit bus access, while the Arc Pro B370 relies on shared system memory.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 wins on power efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP versus 220 W represents a significant reduction in power draw. As an IGP with no power connectors and no suggested PSU, it is designed for systems where discrete graphics are not feasible. Its 3 nm Intel process node is smaller than the 4 nm TSMC node used by the RX 9070, though the performance implications of this cannot be quantified from the available data. Its release date of 2026-01-26 is later than the RX 9070's 2025-03-05 launch.

For use cases, the RX 9070 is suited to scenarios requiring dedicated graphics memory, high FP32 throughput, and measured benchmark performance. The Arc Pro B370 is suited to low-power integrated scenarios, as indicated by its IGP classification and 25 W TDP, though its actual performance remains unmeasured. The data does not support any conclusion about the Arc Pro B370's gaming or compute capabilities, as no benchmark results exist for it in the database.