AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP vs Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP

CORE STATE Navi 44
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 3050 MHz
TDP 140 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 4.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile

CORE STATE Meteor Lake
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 65 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE Xe-LPG
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
88,183
N/A
geekbench_vulkan
39,476
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP vs Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows two GPUs at opposite ends of the performance spectrum. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP delivers an average benchmark score of 63830, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile, by contrast, sits in the 50th percentile. Direct benchmark scores for the Intel part are absent from the database, which means the comparison relies on the AMD card's recorded results and its nearest rival deltas.

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP posts 88183 in Geekbench OpenCL and 39476 in Geekbench Vulkan. These two figures bracket the GPU's compute and graphics workloads. The OpenCL result indicates strong raw compute throughput, while the Vulkan score reflects the same hardware under a graphics API workload. The average of these two submissions, 63830, aligns closely with the card's nearest rivals. The NVIDIA CMP 30HX averages 63842, which represents a 0% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M sits at 63775, a 0.1% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 records 63693, a 0.2% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 posts 64212, a -0.6% delta. The RX 9060 XT LP therefore lands within a narrow band of roughly 0.6 percentage points of four comparable GPUs, confirming that its average score is highly competitive with that peer group.

The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile has no benchmark entries in the database and no nearest rivals. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0. That absence of recorded data prevents any direct numerical comparison between the two cards. What the database does show is the Intel part's percentile placement at 50, which indicates it sits at the midpoint of all GPUs tracked. The AMD card's 89th percentile placement puts it near the top of the distribution. The gap in percentile rankings, 39 points, is the clearest statistical separation between the two products.

The AMD card's FP32 throughput of 24.99 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 24.99 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio) demonstrate consistent compute capability across precision formats. The Intel part delivers 3.942 TFLOPS FP32 and 7.885 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The FP16 advantage on the Intel side, roughly double its FP32 rate, suggests a design optimized for mixed-precision workloads, but the absolute numbers remain far below the AMD card's output. The AMD GPU also leads in pixel throughput at 195.2 GPixel/s versus 52.80 GPixel/s, and in texture throughput at 390.4 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP compare to its closest rivals in average score?

A: The AMD card averages 63830. The NVIDIA CMP 30HX is 0% away at 63842, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M is 0.1% away at 63775, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 is 0.2% away at 63693, and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 is -0.6% away at 64212.

Q: What benchmark scores are recorded for the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile?

A: The database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel part. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed.

Q: What percentile rank does each GPU hold in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP sits in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile sits in the 50th percentile.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP uses 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 322.3 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile uses system shared memory, with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of the two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP boosts to 3050 MHz. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile boosts to 2200 MHz.

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 performance figure?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP delivers 24.99 TFLOPS FP32. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile delivers 3.942 TFLOPS FP32. The AMD card's FP32 output is over six times higher.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers, different process nodes, and different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP uses the Navi 44 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture. It belongs to the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation. The chip is fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm process. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile uses the Meteor Lake chip built on Xe-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M (Meteor Lake) generation, fabricated by Intel on a 10 nm process. The process node gap, 4 nm versus 10 nm, explains a significant portion of the efficiency and density differences between the two products.

The AMD chip contains 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die. That translates to a transistor density of 149.2M per mm². The Intel chip's transistor count, die size, and density are not recorded in the database. The AMD GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the Intel part uses a Ring Bus. The AMD card's display outputs are listed as 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a. The Intel part's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent.

The AMD GPU includes 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel part lists no ray tracing core count. The AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The shading unit counts differ substantially: the AMD card has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The Intel part has 896 shading units, 56 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. The AMD card's resource allocation across all three pipeline stages is roughly 2.3 to 2.7 times that of the Intel part.

The AMD GPU's FP16 to FP32 ratio is 1:1, meaning both precision formats run at the same throughput. The Intel part runs FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, doubling its FP32 rate. This architectural choice suggests the Intel design targets workloads that benefit from reduced precision, while the AMD design maintains symmetric throughput. The AMD card's memory clocks are listed at 2518 MHz with 20.1 Gbps effective data rate, while the Intel part's memory clock is listed as system shared.

Specification Differences

The database records several specification fields where the two GPUs differ. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The AMD chip has 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die. The Intel chip's transistor count and die size are not recorded.

Memory configurations diverge completely. The AMD card has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 322.3 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth and a system shared bus width. The AMD card's base clock is 1380 MHz, its boost clock is 3050 MHz, and its game clock is 2450 MHz. The Intel part's base clock is 300 MHz and its boost clock is 2200 MHz, with no game clock listed.

The AMD GPU's TDP is 140 W, the Intel part's is 65 W. The AMD card is dual-slot with a 1x 8-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 300 W. The Intel part is an IGP with no power connectors and no suggested PSU listed. The AMD card uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface; the Intel part uses a Ring Bus. The AMD card's pixel rate is 195.2 GPixel/s versus 52.80 GPixel/s for the Intel part. Texture rates are 390.4 GTexel/s and 123.2 GTexel/s respectively. FP32 output is 24.99 TFLOPS versus 3.942 TFLOPS. FP16 output is 24.99 TFLOPS versus 7.885 TFLOPS.

The AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both share OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 896 shading units, 56 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, with no ray tracing core count recorded. The AMD card's release date is 2025-12-16, the Intel part's is 2023-12-13. The AMD card's predecessor is Navi III, the Intel part's predecessor is HD Graphics-M. Neither part has a successor listed, and neither has a launch MSRP in the database.

The Verdict

The data separates these two GPUs into distinct categories. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is a discrete, dual-slot card with 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, a 140 W TDP, and a 3050 MHz boost clock. Its average benchmark score of 63830 places it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals within 0.6% of its average score. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is an integrated processor graphics solution with 65 W TDP, system shared memory, and a 2200 MHz boost clock. It sits in the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark scores.

The AMD card's pixel rate of 195.2 GPixel/s, texture rate of 390.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput of 24.99 TFLOPS all exceed the Intel part's corresponding figures by substantial margins. The Intel part's FP16 rate of 7.885 TFLOPS, while double its own FP32 rate, still falls below the AMD card's 24.99 TFLOPS FP16 output. The AMD card's 89th percentile ranking versus the Intel part's 50th percentile ranking reflects a 39-point gap in the database's overall distribution.

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is the appropriate selection for workloads that demand dedicated memory bandwidth, high pixel throughput, and competitive compute performance relative to its nearest rivals. Its 16 GB GDDR6 allocation and 322.3 GB/s bandwidth provide a fixed, dedicated memory pool. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile serves a different role as an integrated solution with system dependent memory resources, no discrete power connectors, and a lower thermal envelope. The database's absence of benchmark entries for the Intel part means its real-world performance cannot be quantified from recorded data. The AMD card's recorded scores, percentile placement, and rival comparisons give it a clear statistical edge.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 9060 XT LP
Graphics 112EU Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,048
896 -56.3%
Shaders
2,048
896 -56.3%
TMUs
128
56 -56.3%
ROPs
64
24 -62.5%
Compute Units
32
—
Execution Units
—
112
Clocks
Base Clock
1380 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
3050 MHz
2200 MHz
Game Clock
2450 MHz
—
Memory Clock
2518 MHz 20.1 Gbps effective
System Shared
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
System Shared
VRAM (MB)
16,384
—
Memory Type
GDDR6
System Shared
Memory Bus
128 bit
System Shared
Bandwidth
322.3 GB/s
System Dependent
Cache
L2 Cache
4 MB
—
L3 Cache
32 MB
—
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
195.2 GPixel/s
52.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
390.4 GTexel/s
123.2 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
24.99 TFLOPS
3.942 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
780.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
—
FP16 (TFLOPS)
24.99 TFLOPS (1:1)
7.885 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
32
—
Matrix Cores
64
—
Power
TDP
140 W
65 W
TDP (W)
140
65 -53.6%
Suggested PSU
300 W
—
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
—
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
Xe-LPG
GPU Name
Navi 44
Meteor Lake
Generation
Navi IV (RX 9000)
Arc Graphics-M (Meteor Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
29,700 million
—
Die Size
199 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Density
149.2M / mm²
—
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
Shader Model
6.9
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b2x DisplayPort 2.1a
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Ring Bus
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Navi III
HD Graphics-M
View Radeon RX 9060 XT LP Details View Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile Details