AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE and Lisuan Tech LX MAX represent two distinct approaches to desktop graphics, with the database showing a clear separation in performance, memory configuration, and architectural design. The RX 7650 GRE is an established RDNA 3.0 part with measured benchmark scores, while the LX MAX is a newer, higher-specification card with no recorded benchmark results yet. The data indicates that the LX MAX is designed to occupy a higher performance tier, though its actual performance remains unverified in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains direct benchmark results for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE, but the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded scores. This means a per-test comparison cannot be constructed from the available data. Instead, the RX 7650 GRE's performance can be contextualized through its average benchmark score and percentile ranking.

The RX 7650 GRE achieves an average benchmark score of 42723 across all recorded tests. This places it in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs in the database, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of recorded graphics cards. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 2336, and in Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 83109. These two results are the only direct measurements available for this card.

The nearest rivals to the RX 7650 GRE, based on average benchmark scores, are all NVIDIA products. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has an average score of 43223, which is 1.2 percent higher than the RX 7650 GRE. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43262, also 1.2 percent higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268, 1.3 percent higher, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 scores 43301, 1.3 percent higher. These deltas are all within 1.3 percent, meaning the RX 7650 GRE sits in a very tight competitive band with these four cards. The difference between the lowest and highest of these five GPUs is only 78 points, less than 0.2 percent of the average score.

For the LX MAX, the database lists an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile ranking of 50, with no individual test results and no nearest rivals recorded. The zero average score does not reflect a measured performance of zero; rather, it indicates that no benchmark data has been entered for this card. The 50th percentile is likewise a placeholder, not a ranking based on actual performance. Therefore, any head-to-head comparison must rely on the hardware specifications and architectural details, which show the LX MAX in a favorable position for raw compute and memory bandwidth.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has an average benchmark score of 42723, placing it in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database shows zero benchmark results for the LX MAX, and its average score is listed as 0, meaning no measured performance data is available.

Q: How does the memory configuration differ between the two cards?

A: The RX 7650 GRE uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the peak FP32 compute figures for each card?

A: The RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is higher.

Q: Which card has more shading units and texture mapping units?

A: The LX MAX has 6144 shading units and 192 texture mapping units. The RX 7650 GRE has 2048 shading units and 128 texture mapping units.

Q: What API levels does each card support?

A: Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7650 GRE supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two cards is substantial. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, specifically using the Navi 33 chip with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi III generation, which is part of the RX 7000 series. The LX MAX uses a chip designated as 7G106, with an architecture named TrueGPU, and belongs to the 7G100 generation. The manufacturer of the LX MAX is listed as Unknown, which is a notable contrast to AMD for the RX 7650 GRE.

Both cards are fabricated on a 6 nm process node at TSMC, which is a common manufacturing point. The RX 7650 GRE has a transistor count of 13,300 million and a die size of 204 mm², yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The LX MAX has unknown transistor count, die size, and no density figure in the database. This means the physical complexity of the LX MAX cannot be quantified from the available data.

The compute architectures differ in their FP16 capabilities. The RX 7650 GRE delivers FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, both at 22.08 TFLOPS. The LX MAX delivers FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, reaching 49.15 TFLOPS while maintaining 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32. This indicates the LX MAX has dedicated or more efficient FP16 execution paths, which often benefits AI workloads and certain compute tasks.

The LX MAX also lacks any recorded ray tracing core count, while the RX 7650 GRE has 32 ray tracing cores. Neither card lists tensor cores in the database. The RX 7650 GRE's ray tracing cores are part of its RDNA 3.0 design, but the LX MAX's ray tracing hardware is not specified, leaving its ray tracing capability unquantified.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every major specification field. The RX 7650 GRE has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. The LX MAX does not list base, boost, or game clocks, so its clock speeds are unknown. Both cards share the same memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate.

Memory capacity and bandwidth strongly favor the LX MAX. The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. This gives the LX MAX 50 percent more memory capacity and 50 percent more memory bandwidth.

The pixel and texture rates also favor the LX MAX. The RX 7650 GRE has a pixel rate of 172.5 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 345.0 GTexel/s. The LX MAX has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. These are increases of approximately 11 percent for pixel rate and 11 percent for texture rate.

Power consumption differs significantly. The RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W and uses a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested power supply of 450 W. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W and uses a single 16-pin connector, with a suggested power supply of 550 W. The LX MAX draws 55 W more power and requires a larger power supply.

The bus interface differs as well. The RX 7650 GRE uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The x16 interface provides twice the bandwidth available to the card. Display outputs also differ: the RX 7650 GRE has 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the LX MAX has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The LX MAX lacks HDMI output and uses the older DisplayPort 1.4a standard.

Physical dimensions show the LX MAX is larger. The RX 7650 GRE is 204 mm long and 115 mm tall. The LX MAX is 248 mm long and 118 mm tall, with a width of 48 mm. Both are dual-slot cards. The RX 7650 GRE was released on 2025-02-06, while the LX MAX was released on 2026-03-16, over a year later. The RX 7650 GRE has a launch MSRP of 279 USD; no launch MSRP is recorded for the LX MAX.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is the only card with verified performance results. Its average benchmark score of 42723 and 83rd percentile ranking demonstrate solid mid-to-high tier performance, sitting within 1.3 percent of several NVIDIA cards in the database. The LX MAX has no benchmark data, so its real-world performance cannot be confirmed from the database.

However, the specification data suggests the LX MAX is positioned as a higher-performance card. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 is about 11 percent higher than the RX 7650 GRE's 22.08 TFLOPS. Its 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is 50 percent higher, and its 12 GB memory capacity is 50 percent higher. The LX MAX also has three times the shading units (6144 vs. 2048), 1.5 times the texture mapping units (192 vs. 128), and 1.5 times the ROPs (96 vs. 64). These are substantial architectural advantages on paper.

The RX 7650 GRE has advantages in its own right. It supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX only supports Vulkan 1.3. It has 32 ray tracing cores, which the LX MAX does not list. It also has a much lower power requirement, with a 170 W TDP versus 225 W, and a smaller physical footprint. The RX 7650 GRE uses a standard 8-pin connector, while the LX MAX requires a 16-pin connector.

For users who prioritize verified performance and established software support, the RX 7650 GRE is the safer choice based on the database. For users who prioritize raw compute specifications, memory capacity, and bandwidth, the LX MAX appears superior on paper. The lack of benchmark data for the LX MAX means its actual performance could be lower or higher than its specifications suggest. The database does not provide enough evidence to declare a definitive winner in real-world gaming or compute workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE wins in every category where measured data exists. It has a recorded average benchmark score, recorded 3DMark and Geekbench results, and a meaningful percentile ranking. The LX MAX has none of these. In terms of software ecosystem, the RX 7650 GRE supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The RX 7650 GRE's newer Vulkan version is a clear advantage for compatibility with modern applications.

The RX 7650 GRE also wins on power efficiency and physical size. Its 170 W TDP is significantly lower than the LX MAX's 225 W, and its 450 W suggested power supply is lower than the 550 W requirement. The RX 7650 GRE is shorter at 204 mm versus 248 mm, making it easier to fit in smaller cases. It uses a more common 8-pin power connector, while the LX MAX requires a 16-pin connector, which may necessitate a newer power supply.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins on raw hardware specifications. Its 12 GB memory capacity exceeds the RX 7650 GRE's 8 GB, and its 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is 50 percent higher. Its FP32 compute of 24.58 TFLOPS is higher, and its FP16 performance of 49.15 TFLOPS is more than double the RX 7650 GRE's 22.08 TFLOPS FP16. The LX MAX has more shading units, texture mapping units, and ROPs, and it uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface rather than x8. Its pixel rate and texture rate are both higher.

For memory-intensive workloads, such as large textures, high resolutions, or compute tasks that require large data sets, the LX MAX's 12 GB frame buffer and 192-bit bus provide a clear theoretical advantage. For applications that favor high FP16 throughput, the LX MAX's 2:1 FP16 ratio is a significant edge. The RX 7650 GRE, with its verified performance and lower power draw, is better suited for users who want a known quantity with a smaller power envelope and newer display outputs (DisplayPort 2.1 vs. 1.4a). The database does not support claims about actual game performance for the LX MAX, so any decision involving it must be based on specifications alone.