AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data places these two processors at opposite ends of the performance spectrum. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109, yielding an average benchmark score of 42723. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, with an average benchmark score of zero, so the head-to-head comparison relies on the AMD card's position among its nearest rivals and the architectural specifications of both parts.

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE sits at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, posts an average score of 43223, which places the AMD card 1.2 percent behind. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB also averages 43262, again 1.2 percent ahead of the RX 7650 GRE. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile records 43268, 1.3 percent higher, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 shows 43301, also 1.3 percent higher. These margins are narrow, indicating that the RX 7650 GRE competes directly with those mid-range and professional cards, trailing by roughly one percentage point in aggregate scoring.

The Intel Arc Pro B370, by contrast, has no benchmark entries and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile rank of 50 places it at the median of all GPUs, but with zero recorded scores, that rank reflects the absence of data rather than a measured performance level. The database shows no head-to-head benchmark results between the two cards, and neither card records a win in direct comparison fields.

What the measurements do show is the scale of the difference. The AMD card's FP32 compute reaches 22.08 TFLOPS, while the Intel part delivers 6.144 TFLOPS. That is 3.59 times higher FP32 throughput for the AMD card. The pixel rate tells a similar story: 172.5 GPixel/s for the Radeon versus 48.00 GPixel/s for the Arc Pro, a 3.59 times advantage. Texture rate runs 345.0 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s, again 3.59 times higher. The AMD card's shading units number 2048 against 1280 for Intel, its texture mapping units total 128 versus 40, and its render output units reach 64 versus 20. Ray tracing cores count 32 on the AMD side and 10 on the Intel side.

The memory subsystem reinforces the gap. The RX 7650 GRE uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, producing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 relies on system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, so no fixed figure exists. The AMD card's memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective, while the Intel part's memory clock is listed as system shared.

Clock speeds present a mixed picture. The AMD card's base clock is 1720 MHz, its game clock is 2350 MHz, and its boost reaches 2695 MHz. The Intel part has a base clock of just 300 MHz but boosts to 2400 MHz. The AMD card's advantage in sustained clocks is clear, though the Intel part's boost clock comes within roughly 300 MHz of the AMD boost figure. Power draw differs massively: the Radeon consumes 170 W, while the Arc Pro B370 draws only 25 W. That makes the Intel part an integrated graphics processor, listed as an IGP in the database, whereas the AMD card is a dual-slot discrete card with a single 8-pin power connector and a recommended 450 W power supply.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE averages 42723 points. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores, so its average is zero.

Q: How does the RX 7650 GRE compare to its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER averages 43223 points, which is 1.2 percent higher than the RX 7650 GRE's average of 42723.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses a 6 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses a 3 nm process from Intel.

Q: What memory configuration does each card use?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: What is the thermal design power for each part?

A: The AMD card has a TDP of 170 W. The Intel part has a TDP of 25 W and is classified as an integrated graphics processor.

Q: Do both cards support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from entirely different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip and the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It is part of the Navi III generation, which the database lists as the RX 7000 series. The chip uses a 6 nm process from TSMC, integrates 13,300 million transistors, and has a die size of 204 mm². The transistor density works out to 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The card's predecessor is Navi II and its successor is Navi IV, marking it as a middle step in the Navi lineage.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture with the Panther Lake chip, part of the Arc Graphics-WM generation. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The database lists transistor count and die size as unknown, so no density figure exists. Its predecessor is HD Graphics-WM, with no successor recorded. The architecture targets integrated graphics, as shown by the IGP slot width and the system shared memory.

Compute resources differ sharply. The AMD card carries 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 render output units, and 10 ray tracing cores. Neither card has tensor cores listed. The AMD card's FP16 performance matches its FP32 at 22.08 TFLOPS, a 1:1 ratio. The Intel part achieves 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 against 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, a 2:1 ratio, meaning it processes half-precision at twice the rate of full precision.

Clock behavior reflects the integrated versus discrete split. The AMD card sustains a base of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2350 MHz, and a boost of 2695 MHz. The Intel part idles at a 300 MHz base but boosts to 2400 MHz. The low base clock suggests aggressive power management for a chip that shares power with a CPU, while the boost clock shows it can reach competitive frequencies when needed.

The memory architecture is fundamental. The AMD card uses dedicated GDDR6, 8 GB on a 128-bit interface, with 288.0 GB/s of fixed bandwidth. The Intel part has no dedicated memory; it uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, meaning its performance scales with the host system's memory configuration. This affects not just capacity but latency and bandwidth consistency. The AMD card's memory clock of 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective, is a fixed figure, whereas the Intel part's memory clock is listed as system shared.

Physical specifications confirm the different intended deployments. The AMD card measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height, occupies a dual-slot width, and requires a single 8-pin power connector with a 450 W suggested power supply. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded dimensions, uses no power connectors, and requires no suggested PSU because it integrates into a system. Display outputs on the AMD card include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The Intel part's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, reflecting its role in mobile or compact systems.

Release timing also differs. The AMD card was released on February 6, 2025, with a launch MSRP of 279 USD. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a release date of January 26, 2026, and no launch MSRP recorded. Both are marked as active production status.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear performance hierarchy. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE delivers measurable compute and graphics throughput: 22.08 TFLOPS FP32, 172.5 GPixel/s pixel rate, 345.0 GTexel/s texture rate, and 288.0 GB/s of dedicated memory bandwidth. It ranks at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 42723, placing it within 1.3 percent of NVIDIA's RTX 4070 SUPER and Quadro M6000 variants. These are competitive numbers for a discrete graphics card.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 shows no measured performance in the database. Its average benchmark score is zero, it has no nearest rivals, and it has no head-to-head results. The specifications that do exist indicate a far lower compute ceiling: 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, 48.00 GPixel/s, and 96.00 GTexel/s. That is roughly one-third the throughput of the AMD card in each metric. The Intel part compensates with a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, and integrated graphics classification, making it suitable for systems where power draw and space are the primary constraints.

The choice between these two rests on the deployment context. The RX 7650 GRE is a discrete card for desktop systems with a 170 W TDP, a dual-slot cooler, and a 450 W suggested PSU. It delivers the kind of performance that competes with mid-range NVIDIA offerings, as the 1.2 percent delta against the RTX 4070 SUPER shows. The Arc Pro B370, with its 3 nm process, 25 W TDP, and system shared memory, targets integrated graphics roles in portable devices or compact systems where dedicated memory and high power budgets are unavailable.

The release dates reinforce this split. The AMD card arrived in February 2025 at a 279 USD launch MSRP. The Intel part follows in January 2026 with no MSRP listed, consistent with an integrated part sold as part of a platform rather than as a standalone product. The database records no wins for either card in head-to-head fields, but the specification comparison alone indicates that any workload requiring sustained GPU compute, high memory bandwidth, or dedicated VRAM favors the AMD part. Any workload constrained by power envelope, physical size, or the absence of a discrete GPU slot favors the Intel part. The data does not support a single universal recommendation; it supports a context-dependent selection.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification.

Process node: AMD uses 6 nm from TSMC. Intel uses 3 nm from its own foundry.

Transistors: AMD integrates 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, for a density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. Intel lists transistor count and die size as unknown.

Clocks: AMD runs a base of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2350 MHz, and a boost of 2695 MHz. Intel runs a base of 300 MHz and a boost of 2400 MHz, with no game clock recorded.

Memory: AMD has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 2250 MHz memory clock, 18 Gbps effective. Intel uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth and a system shared memory clock.

Compute units: AMD has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. Intel has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores.

Rates: AMD delivers 172.5 GPixel/s pixel rate, 345.0 GTexel/s texture rate, and 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 with 22.08 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. Intel delivers 48.00 GPixel/s, 96.00 GTexel/s, 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio.

Power: AMD has a 170 W TDP, dual-slot width, one 8-pin connector, and a 450 W suggested PSU. Intel has a 25 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU.

Bus interface: AMD uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Intel uses IGP.

Display outputs: AMD provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. Intel's outputs are portable device dependent.

APIs: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Physical dimensions: AMD measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height. Intel has no recorded dimensions.

Release and pricing: AMD released on February 6, 2025, with a launch MSRP of 279 USD. Intel released on January 26, 2026, with no MSRP recorded. Both are active production parts.

Benchmark standing: AMD holds the 83rd percentile with an average score of 42723. Intel holds the 50th percentile with an average score of zero and no recorded benchmarks.