AMD Radeon RX 7600S vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The data presents an unusual pairing: the AMD Radeon RX 7600S is a fully benchmarked mobile GPU with ten recorded test scores, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The RX 7600S therefore wins every measurable category by default, but the LX MAX counters with structural advantages that the benchmarks do not capture.

The RX 7600S occupies the mobile segment with a 75 W TDP and an IGP slot width, meaning it is designed for integration into laptops with no separate power connector. Its benchmark suite spans DirectX 9 through DirectX 12, OpenCL, Vulkan, and compute workloads, producing an average benchmark score of 16696 and a percentile rank of 60 among all GPUs. The LX MAX, by contrast, is a dual-slot desktop card with a 225 W TDP, a 1x 16-pin power connector, a 550 W suggested PSU, and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Its percentile rank of 50 places it below the RX 7600S in the overall distribution, but this rank is derived from zero recorded scores, so it reflects the database's lack of data rather than measured performance.

The use-case split is clear from the specifications. The RX 7600S wins in power efficiency, portability, and API coverage: it supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX is limited to Vulkan 1.3. The LX MAX wins in raw throughput potential, memory capacity, and memory bandwidth: 12 GB versus 8 GB, 432.0 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s, and a 192-bit bus versus 128-bit. The LX MAX also has a much higher peak FP32 rate at 24.58 TFLOPS versus 15.77 TFLOPS, along with higher pixel and texture rates.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different design lineages. The RX 7600S uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, and belongs to the Navi Mobile generation (RX 7000M). It is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip with TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation, also fabricated by TSMC on 6 nm, but its transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown.

Core counts differ substantially. The RX 7600S has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 28 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no ray tracing cores are listed. This means the LX MAX is a much wider design in terms of parallel compute resources, yet it lacks the dedicated ray tracing hardware that the RX 7600S includes.

Memory architecture also diverges. The RX 7600S uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). Clock speeds for the LX MAX core are not recorded; the RX 7600S has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2200 MHz, and a game clock of 1865 MHz.

Power delivery and physical design are equally distinct. The RX 7600S is a 75 W part with no power connectors and an IGP form factor, making it suitable for thin-and-light systems. The LX MAX is a 225 W dual-slot card measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, requiring a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU. Both use PCIe 4.0 x16 as the bus interface.

API support is nearly identical with one exception. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7600S supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs are portable-device dependent for the RX 7600S, whereas the LX MAX has a fixed set of four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for this pair, and the LX MAX has zero recorded benchmark scores. The comparison therefore relies entirely on the RX 7600S's measured results and the LX MAX's theoretical specifications.

The RX 7600S posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1888. In Geekbench, it scores 68012 in OpenCL and 73868 in Vulkan. PassMark results include a G3D score of 15408, a G2D score of 776, a GPU compute score of 6520, and legacy DirectX scores of 211 for DirectX 9, 140 for DirectX 11, 74 for DirectX 10, and 65 for DirectX 12. The average benchmark score stands at 16696, with a percentile rank of 60 across all GPUs.

The nearest rivals for the RX 7600S provide context for these numbers. The NVIDIA T400 4 GB has an average score of 16792, which is 0.6% higher than the RX 7600S. The NVIDIA T400 has an average score of 16508, putting it 1.1% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 has an average score of 16504, also 1.1% lower. The NVIDIA Tesla M4 has an average score of 16932, which is 1.4% higher. These margins are narrow, indicating that the RX 7600S sits in a tightly contested performance band despite its mobile positioning.

The LX MAX has no score to compare directly. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is 55.9% higher than the RX 7600S's 15.77 TFLOPS, which suggests a large theoretical advantage in raw compute. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s exceeds the RX 7600S's 140.8 GPixel/s by 36.4%, and its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s exceeds 246.4 GTexel/s by 55.8%. Memory bandwidth is 68.8% higher at 432.0 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s. These are specification-derived deltas, not measured deltas, so they indicate potential rather than confirmed performance.

The Verdict

The RX 7600S is the only one of the two with recorded performance data, and it delivers a solid mid-range result. Its average benchmark score of 16696 places it at the 60th percentile of all GPUs, with rival scores from the NVIDIA T400 family and the RTX 5090 D V2 clustering within 1.4% on either side. For a 75 W mobile part, this is a competitive showing in the database's measurements.

The LX MAX, however, is a different class of hardware in purely physical terms. It draws three times the power at 225 W, uses a 12 GB memory pool on a 192-bit bus, and offers peak compute rates that exceed the RX 7600S by more than half in FP32, pixel throughput, and texture throughput. Its lack of benchmark scores means the database cannot confirm whether this theoretical advantage translates into real-world results. The 50th percentile rank assigned to it is an artifact of missing data, not a measured outcome.

Users who need a mobile solution with ray tracing support, Vulkan 1.4 compatibility, and low power consumption should select the RX 7600S. Users who need maximum memory capacity, high bandwidth, and a desktop form factor with multiple DisplayPort outputs should consider the LX MAX, provided they accept that its performance is unverified in the database. The RX 7600S is the safer choice for anyone who wants measured, confirmed performance; the LX MAX is the higher-risk, higher-ceiling option whose true standing will remain unknown until benchmark data is recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher benchmark score?

A: Only the AMD Radeon RX 7600S has recorded benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score is 16696, with a percentile rank of 60 among all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores and an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S has a 75 W TDP, an IGP slot width, and no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a 225 W TDP, a dual-slot design, a 1x 16-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Does either GPU support ray tracing?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S includes 28 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no ray tracing cores listed in its specifications.

Q: What API versions do the two GPUs support?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: How do the RX 7600S's nearest rivals compare?

A: The NVIDIA T400 4 GB is 0.6% higher in average score, the NVIDIA Tesla M4 is 1.4% higher, the NVIDIA T400 is 1.1% lower, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is 1.2% lower than the RX 7600S.

Q: What display outputs does each GPU provide?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S has display outputs that are portable device dependent. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.