AMD Radeon RX 7600S vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

The AMD Radeon RX 7600S and Intel Arc Pro B370 occupy different corners of the mobile graphics landscape. The RX 7600S is a dedicated discrete GPU from the Radeon RX 7000 series, built on the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture. The Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor from Intel’s Panther Lake platform, using Xe3-LPG architecture. Their specifications, performance data, and intended roles diverge sharply, and this analysis walks through what the recorded measurements and architectural details show.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two parts. The head-to-head section lists zero tests, and the win counts for both items are zero. This means there are no side-by-side scores from the same workload to compare directly. Instead, the available data consists of separate benchmark entries for the AMD Radeon RX 7600S only. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, with an average benchmark score of zero and an empty benchmarks list.

For the RX 7600S, the recorded scores span several test suites. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 1888. Geekbench OpenCL returns 68012, while Geekbench Vulkan returns 73868. Passmark tests show a wide spread: DirectX 10 scores 74, DirectX 11 scores 140, DirectX 12 scores 65, DirectX 9 scores 211, G2D scores 776, G3D scores 15408, and GPU compute scores 6520. The average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 16696, with a percentile rank of 60 among all GPUs.

Because the Arc Pro B370 has no scores, the comparison relies on what each part’s specifications and overall database position imply. The RX 7600S sits at the 60th percentile of all GPUs, while the Arc Pro B370 sits at the 50th percentile. That percentile gap suggests the RX 7600S occupies a higher performance tier in the overall distribution, but without direct benchmark numbers for the Intel part, the exact magnitude remains unquantified. The RX 7600S also has nearest rivals in the database: the NVIDIA T400 4 GB with an average score of 16792 and a delta of -0.6 percent, the NVIDIA T400 at 16508 with a delta of 1.1 percent, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 at 16504 with a delta of 1.2 percent, and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 at 16932 with a delta of -1.4 percent. These deltas indicate the RX 7600S performs within roughly a percentage point of these rivals, clustering tightly around the 16500 to 17000 average score range.

Where Each One Wins

The win distribution is asymmetric because of missing data. The RX 7600S has recorded wins in every benchmark category it was tested on, but the head-to-head win count is zero because no direct comparison exists. The Arc Pro B370 also has zero recorded wins, again due to the absence of head-to-head tests. This means the database cannot confirm any workload where one definitively beats the other.

Looking at the RX 7600S’s strengths from its scores, it shows particular capability in compute-heavy and modern API tests. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 73868 is higher than the OpenCL score of 68012, suggesting strong performance under Vulkan workloads. Passmark G3D at 15408 indicates solid rasterization performance, while GPU compute at 6520 reflects decent general compute throughput. The DirectX 12 score of 65 is notably lower than DirectX 9 at 211 and DirectX 11 at 140, which could indicate driver or architectural optimization differences across API generations.

For the Arc Pro B370, without any benchmarks, its wins cannot be established from measurements. Its architecture and specifications suggest it targets low-power integrated scenarios, but the data does not support any performance claims. The 50th percentile placement is the only performance-related metric available, and it implies a mid-pack position relative to all GPUs, though this percentile is not tied to any specific test score.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S has an average benchmark score of 16696. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has an average benchmark score of 0, as it has no recorded benchmark results.

Q: How do the two GPUs rank among all GPUs?

A: The RX 7600S ranks at the 60th percentile of all GPUs. The Arc Pro B370 ranks at the 50th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What is the highest recorded benchmark score for the RX 7600S?

A: The highest single test score for the RX 7600S is 73868 in Geekbench Vulkan. The next highest is 68012 in Geekbench OpenCL.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B370 have any benchmark results in the database?

A: No. The benchmarks list for the Arc Pro B370 is empty, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the RX 7600S based on average score?

A: The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Tesla M4 (16932, -1.4 percent), NVIDIA T400 4 GB (16792, -0.6 percent), NVIDIA T400 (16508, 1.1 percent), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 (16504, 1.2 percent).

Q: How does the RX 7600S compare to its nearest rival in terms of delta percentage?

A: The RX 7600S is 0.6 percent slower than the NVIDIA T400 4 GB, 1.1 percent faster than the NVIDIA T400, 1.2 percent faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, and 1.4 percent slower than the NVIDIA Tesla M4.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ substantially across nearly every specification field. The RX 7600S uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC, while the Arc Pro B370 uses a 3 nm process node from Intel. The AMD chip, Navi 33, packs 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². The Intel chip, Panther Lake, has unknown transistor count, die size, and density. Clock speeds show a large gap in base clocks: the RX 7600S runs at 1500 MHz base and 2200 MHz boost, with a game clock of 1865 MHz. The Arc Pro B370 has a 300 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost, with no game clock listed.

Memory configurations are entirely different. The RX 7600S has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128 bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, with system shared type, bus width, and system dependent bandwidth. Memory clock for the RX 7600S is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective; the Arc Pro B370’s memory clock is listed as system shared.

Compute resources differ markedly. The RX 7600S has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. Pixel rate for the RX 7600S is 140.8 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s for the Arc Pro B370. Texture rate is 246.4 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 15.77 TFLOPS for the RX 7600S and 6.144 TFLOPS for the Arc Pro B370. FP16 compute is 31.54 TFLOPS for the RX 7600S and 12.29 TFLOPS for the Arc Pro B370, both at a 2:1 ratio.

Power and interface also differ. The RX 7600S has a TDP of 75 W, while the Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W. Both use IGP slot width and no power connectors. The RX 7600S uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface; the Arc Pro B370 uses an IGP bus interface. Release dates are far apart: the RX 7600S launched on 2023-01-03, and the Arc Pro B370 launched on 2026-01-26.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is fundamental. The RX 7600S is built on RDNA 3.0, AMD’s third-generation Radeon architecture, with a codename of Hotpink Bonefish and a generation label of Navi Mobile (RX 7000M). The Arc Pro B370 uses Xe3-LPG, Intel’s low-power graphics architecture, with a generation label of Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake). The AMD part is a discrete GPU with its own dedicated GDDR6 memory and a 128 bit memory bus. The Intel part is an integrated GPU that shares system memory, with no dedicated video memory or bus width.

Cache and feature details are not fully specified in the database for either part. The RX 7600S has 28 ray tracing cores, and the Arc Pro B370 has 10 ray tracing cores. Neither part lists tensor cores. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RX 7600S’s predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile, while the Arc Pro B370’s predecessor is HD Graphics-WM. Both are currently in active production.

The process node difference is significant: 6 nm TSMC for AMD versus 3 nm Intel for the Arc Pro B370. Transistor density for the RX 7600S is 65.2 million per mm², but the Intel part’s density is unknown. The RX 7600S has a much larger die at 204 mm², whereas the Intel die size is unknown. Clock behavior also differs: the RX 7600S has a higher base clock (1500 MHz vs 300 MHz) but a lower boost clock (2200 MHz vs 2400 MHz). The RX 7600S also has a game clock of 1865 MHz, which the Arc Pro B370 lacks entirely.

The Verdict

The data points to the AMD Radeon RX 7600S as the higher-performance part, based on its recorded benchmarks and superior specification sheet. Its 15.77 TFLOPS FP32 compute is more than double the Arc Pro B370’s 6.144 TFLOPS. Its 256.0 GB/s dedicated memory bandwidth vastly exceeds the Intel part’s system dependent bandwidth. The RX 7600S also has higher pixel rate, texture rate, and more shading units, TMUs, ROPs, and ray tracing cores. Its 60th percentile ranking versus the Arc Pro B370’s 50th percentile reinforces this ordering.

The Intel Arc Pro B370, by contrast, is a low-power integrated solution. Its 25 W TDP is one-third of the RX 7600S’s 75 W, making it suitable for thin-and-light systems where power efficiency takes priority over raw performance. Its 3 nm process node from Intel suggests a modern manufacturing process, but without transistor or die size data, the efficiency comparison cannot be quantified. The absence of any benchmark scores for the Arc Pro B370 means its real-world performance is unverified in the database.

For a user prioritizing gaming or compute performance, the RX 7600S is the clear choice from the available data. Its Vulkan score of 73868 and OpenCL score of 68012 indicate strong API performance, and its average score of 16696 places it near well-known discrete GPUs like the NVIDIA T400 series within a percentage point. For a user prioritizing low power consumption and integrated simplicity, the Arc Pro B370 may fit, but the database provides no performance evidence to support that choice. The verdict from the recorded data is unambiguous: the RX 7600S delivers far higher compute throughput, memory bandwidth, and benchmark scores, while the Arc Pro B370 offers a lower power envelope and a newer process node. Without head-to-head tests, the performance gap cannot be measured directly, but the specification and percentile differences point decisively toward the AMD part for any workload requiring graphics or compute capability.