AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 7600M and Lisuan Tech LX MAX occupy very different positions in the recorded database. The RX 7600M has a measured Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775, placing it in the 89th percentile among all GPUs. The LX MAX has no recorded benchmark score, its average benchmark score is 0, and it sits at the 50th percentile. The head-to-head benchmark list is empty, so direct comparisons rely on the specification data and the RX 7600M's rival set.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only benchmark score available for the RX 7600M is Geekbench OpenCL at 63,775. This result places it just 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (average score 63,830) and 0.1% behind the NVIDIA CMP 30HX (average score 63,842). It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (average score 63,693) and 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 (average score 64,212). These deltas are small, indicating the RX 7600M performs in a tight cluster with those four rivals.

The LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score is 0, and there are no nearest rivals listed. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, meaning no direct test comparison exists between the two products in the database. Consequently, every performance comparison must be inferred from the architectural specifications, not from measured results.

The data shows a significant gap in validated performance data. The RX 7600M delivers a concrete OpenCL score with percentile context, while the LX MAX provides none. The 89th percentile ranking for the RX 7600M indicates it outperforms most recorded GPUs, whereas the 50th percentile for the LX MAX is a default position with no supporting benchmark evidence.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates that the RX 7600M is the only one of the two with a verified benchmark result. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775 places it in the 89th percentile, which is a strong showing relative to the full database. The LX MAX has no benchmark scores, no rivals, and a 50th percentile that reflects absence of data rather than measured performance.

For users who require validated performance numbers, the RX 7600M is the clear choice. It has a measured score, a percentile ranking, and a set of comparable rivals with narrow deltas. The LX MAX offers no such evidence. Its specifications are substantial, but without a benchmark score, the database cannot confirm how those specifications translate into real-world performance.

The LX MAX does present a different hardware profile. It has 12 GB of memory versus 8 GB, a 192-bit bus versus 128-bit, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 256.0 GB/s. It also has more shading units (6,144 versus 1,792), more texture mapping units (192 versus 112), and more render output units (96 versus 64). Its FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS versus 17.27 TFLOPS. However, none of these specifications are verified by benchmark results in the database.

The RX 7600M is the safer pick from the data, because it has a demonstrated score. The LX MAX is a specification-heavy product with no measured performance, so its actual standing remains unquantified.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7600M uses the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture and the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation (RX 7000M) and is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². Its predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile.

The LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip with TrueGPU architecture and belongs to the 7G100 generation. It is also built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown. The manufacturer is listed as Unknown, and no codename or predecessor is given.

The RX 7600M has 28 ray tracing cores, while the LX MAX has no listed ray tracing cores. The RX 7600M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX MAX supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but only Vulkan 1.3. Both use GDDR6 memory, and both use a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

The clock structures differ. The RX 7600M has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2410 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a memory clock of 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective. The LX MAX has no listed base, boost, or game clocks, but its memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. This means the LX MAX memory runs faster, but the GPU core clocks are unrecorded.

The power delivery differs substantially. The RX 7600M has a TDP of 90 W, is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W, uses a dual-slot design, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and lists a suggested PSU of 550 W. The RX 7600M display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, while the LX MAX has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher recorded benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has a recorded Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores, with an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: How does the RX 7600M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7600M is 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (average score 63,830), 0.1% behind the NVIDIA CMP 30HX (average score 63,842), 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (average score 63,693), and 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 (average score 64,212).

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The RX 7600M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the power requirement for each GPU?

A: The RX 7600M has a TDP of 90 W, is an IGP with no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W, uses a dual-slot design with a single 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The LX MAX has 6,144 shading units, while the RX 7600M has 1,792 shading units.

Q: What architecture does each GPU use?

A: The RX 7600M uses RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip. The LX MAX uses TrueGPU architecture with the 7G106 chip.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600M wins in validated performance. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775 is recorded, and it ranks in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. It has a set of four nearest rivals with score deltas ranging from -0.7% to +0.1%, which indicates consistent performance around the 63,700 to 64,200 range. The RX 7600M also has a lower power envelope at 90 W compared to 225 W, making it suitable for portable devices with no power connectors and an IGP form factor.

The LX MAX wins in raw specification counts. It has 12 GB of memory versus 8 GB, a 192-bit bus versus 128-bit, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 256.0 GB/s. It has 6,144 shading units versus 1,792, 192 texture mapping units versus 112, and 96 render output units versus 64. Its FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS versus 17.27 TFLOPS, and its FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS versus 34.55 TFLOPS. Its pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 154.2 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 269.9 GTexel/s. The memory clock is also higher at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective versus 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective.

The LX MAX also wins on physical form factor and connectivity. It is a dual-slot card with dimensions of 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width, and it provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The RX 7600M is an IGP with portable device dependent outputs, meaning its display connectivity is not standardized.

However, the LX MAX has no benchmark scores to confirm that its higher specifications translate into superior performance. The database shows no recorded result for it, so its wins are purely theoretical. The RX 7600M wins in every category where measured data exists.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every recorded specification field. The RX 7600M is manufactured by AMD, while the LX MAX manufacturer is listed as Unknown. The RX 7600M chip is Navi 33, the LX MAX chip is 7G106. The RX 7600M architecture is RDNA 3.0, the LX MAX architecture is TrueGPU. The RX 7600M codename is Hotpink Bonefish, the LX MAX has no codename. The RX 7600M generation is Navi Mobile (RX 7000M), the LX MAX generation is 7G100.

Both use a 6 nm process at TSMC. The RX 7600M has 13,300 million transistors and a 204 mm² die with 65.2 million transistors per mm². The LX MAX transistor count and die size are unknown, and transistor density is not listed.

Clock speeds differ: the RX 7600M has base 1500 MHz, boost 2410 MHz, game 2070 MHz, and memory 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective. The LX MAX has no base, boost, or game clocks, but memory is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory differs: 8 GB versus 12 GB, 128-bit versus 192-bit bus, 256.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Shading units are 1,792 versus 6,144. TMUs are 112 versus 192. ROPs are 64 versus 96. The RX 7600M has 28 ray tracing cores; the LX MAX has none listed.

Pixel rate is 154.2 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 269.9 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 17.27 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 is 34.55 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS, both at 2:1 ratio.

TDP is 90 W versus 225 W. Slot width is IGP versus dual-slot. Power connectors are none versus 1x 16-pin. Suggested PSU is not listed for the RX 7600M, while the LX MAX lists 550 W. Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 for both.

Display outputs are portable device dependent for the RX 7600M, versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for the LX MAX. DirectX support is 12 Ultimate (12_2) for both. OpenGL is 4.6 for both. Vulkan is 1.4 for the RX 7600M and 1.3 for the LX MAX.

The RX 7600M dimensions are not listed, while the LX MAX measures 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm. The RX 7600M release date is January 3, 2023, and the LX MAX release date is March 16, 2026. Both are listed as Active in production status. Neither has a successor listed. The RX 7600M predecessor is Polaris Mobile; the LX MAX predecessor is not listed. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded.