AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a single benchmark entry for the AMD Radeon RX 7600M, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark entries at all. Direct head-to-head comparison is therefore limited to the available OpenCL measurement for the AMD part. The RX 7600M scores 63775 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it at the 89th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Arc Pro B370 has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile, which reflects the absence of recorded performance data rather than an actual performance parity.

The RX 7600M's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its single score. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP averages 63830, a 0.1% lead over the RX 7600M. The NVIDIA CMP 30HX averages 63842, also 0.1% ahead. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 averages 63693, which is 0.1% behind the RX 7600M. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 averages 64212, putting it 0.7% ahead. These deltas are remarkably tight, indicating that the RX 7600M performs within a narrow band around 63775 in synthetic OpenCL workloads.

Because the Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark scores in the database, no quantitative comparison between the two products is possible. The wins counter shows 0 for both sides. Any analysis of relative performance must rely on architectural specifications and feature sets rather than measured outcomes. This is an unusual situation for a head-to-head review, as the data does not support a direct numerical verdict.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M delivers a clear advantage in raw compute throughput based on its recorded specifications. Its FP32 performance reaches 17.27 TFLOPS, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 provides 6.144 TFLOPS, a difference of roughly 2.8 times in favor of AMD. FP16 performance follows the same pattern: the RX 7600M achieves 34.55 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) versus 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) for the Arc Pro B370. Texture rate also favors AMD substantially, with 269.9 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s. Pixel rate separates them further: 154.2 GPixel/s for the RX 7600M compared to 48.00 GPixel/s for the Arc Pro B370.

Memory configuration gives the RX 7600M another category of advantage. It uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 relies on system shared memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. Dedicated VRAM generally provides more predictable bandwidth for graphics workloads, while shared memory depends on the host platform's memory subsystem. The RX 7600M also has a higher shader count with 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs. Ray tracing cores number 28 on the AMD part versus 10 on the Intel part.

The Arc Pro B370 wins in efficiency and integration. Its TDP is 25 W compared to 90 W for the RX 7600M, meaning it consumes less than a third of the power budget. The Intel part uses a 3 nm process from Intel's own foundry, while the RX 7600M uses TSMC's 6 nm node. The Arc Pro B370's base clock is 300 MHz with a boost of 2400 MHz, while the RX 7600M runs at 1500 MHz base and 2410 MHz boost. The lower base clock on the Intel part suggests aggressive power management for thermally constrained environments. Both are integrated graphics processors (IGP) with no power connectors and portable device dependent display outputs.

The RX 7600M also holds a transistor density advantage: 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die yields 65.2M transistors per mm². The Arc Pro B370's transistor count and die size are unknown in the database. The AMD part uses a 128-bit memory bus versus system shared for Intel, which affects memory-bound workloads. For applications that cannot use dedicated VRAM or that run on platforms with weak memory bandwidth, the Arc Pro B370's performance will hinge on the host system rather than its own capabilities.

The Verdict

The data supports a split recommendation based on workload and power constraints. For compute-intensive applications where raw throughput matters, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M is the stronger choice. Its FP32 output of 17.27 TFLOPS, texture rate of 269.9 GTexel/s, and pixel rate of 154.2 GPixel/s indicate a GPU designed for sustained rendering and parallel computation. The 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth provides dedicated memory resources that do not compete with the CPU for system RAM.

For power-sensitive designs, the Intel Arc Pro B370 offers a dramatically lower 25 W TDP, making it suitable for thin-and-light systems where thermals and battery life take priority. Its 3 nm process node, manufactured by Intel, represents a more advanced fabrication technology than the 6 nm TSMC node used by AMD. The Arc Pro B370's system shared memory approach can be an advantage in unified memory architectures where the CPU and GPU access the same pool, reducing data copying overhead. However, the lack of benchmark data for the Intel part means its actual performance remains unverified in this database.

The RX 7600M's 89th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms that its single OpenCL score of 63775 places it in the upper tier of recorded hardware. The Arc Pro B370's 50th percentile ranking is a placeholder due to missing measurements. Anyone choosing between these two GPUs should consider the RX 7600M for applications that demand high compute throughput and dedicated graphics memory. The Arc Pro B370 is the only defensible pick when power consumption below 25 W is a hard requirement, given that the RX 7600M's 90 W TDP is substantially higher.

FAQ

Q: What is the benchmark score for the AMD Radeon RX 7600M?

A: The RX 7600M scores 63775 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it at the 89th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B370 have any benchmark scores?

A: No, the database contains no benchmark entries for the Arc Pro B370. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed.

Q: How much faster is the RX 7600M in FP32 compute?

A: The RX 7600M delivers 17.27 TFLOPS FP32, while the Arc Pro B370 provides 6.144 TFLOPS, making the AMD part approximately 2.8 times faster in raw single-precision compute.

Q: What memory does each GPU use?

A: The RX 7600M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: What are the power consumption figures?

A: The RX 7600M has a TDP of 90 W, while the Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W. Both are integrated graphics processors with no power connectors.

Q: Which process nodes do the two GPUs use?

A: The RX 7600M uses a 6 nm TSMC process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The Arc Pro B370 uses a 3 nm Intel process, but its transistor count and die size are unknown.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M and Intel Arc Pro B370 diverge at nearly every architectural level. AMD builds the RX 7600M on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) generation and succeeds the Polaris Mobile architecture. Intel's Arc Pro B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture with the Panther Lake chip, belonging to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation and succeeding HD Graphics-WM. Both are active production parts with no recorded successors.

The process technology differs substantially. AMD uses TSMC's 6 nm node with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². Intel fabricates the Arc Pro B370 on its own 3 nm process, though the transistor count and die size are not recorded. The 3 nm node represents a newer fabrication generation, though the unknown die dimensions prevent density calculations.

Compute resources show a clear hierarchy. The RX 7600M has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, plus 28 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs, plus 10 ray tracing cores. This gives AMD a 1.4x advantage in shader count, 2.8x in TMUs, and 3.2x in ROPs. The RX 7600M also has 28 ray tracing cores versus 10 for the Intel part, suggesting stronger ray tracing throughput potential.

Clock behavior differs notably. The RX 7600M runs at 1500 MHz base, 2070 MHz game clock, and 2410 MHz boost. The Arc Pro B370 has a 300 MHz base clock and 2400 MHz boost, with no game clock listed. The Intel part's low base clock indicates a power-optimized idle state, while its boost clock approaches the AMD part's maximum. Memory clocks also differ: the RX 7600M uses 2000 MHz memory with 16 Gbps effective data rate, while the Arc Pro B370's memory clock is system shared.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is equal. Both are IGP form factors with no power connectors and portable device dependent display outputs. The RX 7600M uses PCIe 4.0 x16 as its bus interface, while the Arc Pro B370 uses an IGP bus interface, reflecting its integrated design. The RX 7600M's dedicated memory subsystem and wider bus give it an advantage in memory bandwidth, while the Arc Pro B370's shared memory approach ties its performance to the host platform's memory configuration.