AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 and Intel Arc Pro B370 occupy different corners of the professional graphics landscape. The W7500 is a discrete, single-slot add-in card built on the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, while the Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on Panther Lake with Xe3-LPG architecture. The recorded data shows a clear separation in raw compute capability, memory configuration, and thermal envelope, which translates into distinct use-case strengths.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 wins in every measured benchmark category that the database records for both parts, though the Intel Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark entries of its own. The W7500 posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58213 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 68634. These figures place it in the 59th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 16415. The absence of any benchmark scores for the Arc Pro B370 means the database cannot directly compare their performance on identical tests, but the architectural and specification data provides a basis for analysis.

The W7500’s advantage lies in its dedicated memory subsystem. It carries 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. For workloads that rely on sustained memory throughput, such as high-resolution texture streaming or large dataset manipulation, the W7500’s fixed bandwidth is a decisive factor. The W7500 also has a higher pixel rate at 108.8 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 190.4 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s. These numbers indicate the W7500 can fill framebuffers and apply textures at roughly double the rate of the Intel part.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 wins in power efficiency and integration. Its TDP is 25 W, compared to 70 W for the W7500. It also uses no power connectors and is an IGP, meaning it requires no additional card slot or external power. The W7500 also uses no power connectors, but its suggested PSU is 250 W, whereas the Arc Pro B370 lists no suggested PSU requirement. For portable devices or compact systems where power draw and physical space are constrained, the Arc Pro B370 presents a lower-draw option. Its base clock of 300 MHz with a boost of 2400 MHz shows a wide dynamic range, allowing it to idle at very low frequencies and ramp up when needed.

The W7500 also leads in shading resources. It has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 28 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. In FP32 compute, the W7500 delivers 12.19 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS for the Arc Pro B370. FP16 performance follows the same pattern at 24.37 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1). The W7500’s raw compute throughput is exactly double that of the Intel part in both precisions.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is the appropriate choice for workloads requiring dedicated graphics memory, high fill rates, and substantial FP32 compute. Its 8 GB GDDR6 pool, 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 12.19 TFLOPS FP32 performance suit professional rendering, video processing, and GPU-accelerated compute tasks that demand consistent memory bandwidth. The W7500’s 59th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16415, places it near the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (avg score 16408, delta 0%) and slightly ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (avg score 16361, delta 0.3%) and AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (avg score 16351, delta 0.4%). It also trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 (avg score 16504, delta -0.5%) by a narrow margin.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 is suited for systems where an integrated solution is mandatory, such as portable devices or thin clients. Its 25 W TDP and IGP form factor eliminate the need for a discrete card. However, the database contains no benchmark scores for this part, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0. Its percentile ranking is 50, which falls below the W7500’s 59. For professional workloads that require predictable, dedicated memory and higher throughput, the W7500 is the only option with recorded performance data.

The launch MSRP of the W7500 is 429 USD. The Arc Pro B370 has no launch MSRP listed. The W7500 was released on 2023-08-02, while the Arc Pro B370 has a release date of 2026-01-26. The W7500’s predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, and the Arc Pro B370’s predecessor is the HD Graphics-WM. Both parts are currently marked as active in production.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 and the Intel Arc Pro B370. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and both win counts are zero. This absence of direct comparison data means the analysis must rely on the W7500’s standalone benchmark scores and the architectural specifications of both parts.

The W7500’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 58213 and Vulkan score of 68634 represent the only recorded performance metrics for either card. These scores contribute to its average benchmark score of 16415. The Arc Pro B370 has no individual benchmark entries, so its average score is 0. The percentile ranking for the W7500 is 59, versus 50 for the Arc Pro B370. This 9-point percentile gap, while not a direct performance differential, indicates that the W7500 sits higher in the overall GPU distribution.

In terms of nearest rivals, the W7500’s average score of 16415 is essentially tied with the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at 16408 (delta 0%). It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16361) and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (16351). It is 0.5% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 (16504). These deltas are all within one percentage point, indicating that the W7500 sits in a tightly clustered performance band. The Arc Pro B370 has no nearest rivals listed in the database.

The W7500’s pixel rate of 108.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 190.4 GTexel/s directly reflect its 64 ROPs and 112 TMUs. The Arc Pro B370’s 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s correspond to its 20 ROPs and 40 TMUs. The W7500’s rates are 2.27 times higher for pixels and 1.98 times higher for textures. In FP32, the W7500’s 12.19 TFLOPS is exactly 1.98 times the Arc Pro B370’s 6.144 TFLOPS. This near-2x ratio across texture rate and FP32 compute suggests a consistent architectural scaling difference between the two parts.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 delivers 12.19 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS. The W7500 has exactly double the FP32 throughput.

Q: What memory configuration does each card use?

A: The W7500 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, with system dependent bandwidth and no dedicated memory size or bus width.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The W7500 has a TDP of 70 W and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W and lists no suggested PSU requirement. Both use no power connectors.

Q: What are their form factors?

A: The W7500 is a single-slot card measuring 216 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The Arc Pro B370 is an IGP with no listed dimensions.

Q: Which card has more ray tracing cores?

A: The W7500 has 28 ray tracing cores, while the Arc Pro B370 has 10 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the release timeline for each?

A: The W7500 was released on 2023-08-02, and the Arc Pro B370 has a release date of 2026-01-26.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is built on the Navi 33 chip using RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation (Navi III Series). The process node is 6 nm at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture and belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. Its process node is 3 nm at Intel, but transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

The W7500 has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs. Ray tracing cores number 28 for the W7500 and 10 for the Arc Pro B370. Neither part lists tensor cores. The W7500’s clock speeds are 1500 MHz base and 1700 MHz boost, with memory at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The Arc Pro B370 has a 300 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost, with memory speed listed as system shared.

Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The W7500 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the Arc Pro B370 uses an IGP bus interface. Display outputs differ as well: the W7500 has 4x DisplayPort 2.1, and the Arc Pro B370 lists portable device dependent outputs. The W7500’s memory clock is explicitly stated, while the Arc Pro B370’s memory clock is system shared, meaning it depends on the host system’s RAM.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ on several specification fields. The W7500 has a 6 nm process node at TSMC, while the Arc Pro B370 uses a 3 nm process at Intel. Transistor count is 13,300 million for the W7500, and unknown for the Arc Pro B370. Die size is 204 mm² for the W7500, and unknown for the Arc Pro B370. Transistor density is 65.2M per mm² for the W7500, with no value listed for the Arc Pro B370.

Memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all differ. The W7500 has 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 has system shared memory, system shared type, system shared bus width, and system dependent bandwidth. Shading units are 1792 versus 1280, TMUs are 112 versus 40, ROPs are 64 versus 20, and ray tracing cores are 28 versus 10. FP32 is 12.19 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 24.37 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1).

TDP is 70 W for the W7500 and 25 W for the Arc Pro B370. Slot width is single-slot for the W7500 and IGP for the Arc Pro B370. The suggested PSU is 250 W for the W7500, with no value for the Arc Pro B370. Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 versus IGP. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 2.1 versus portable device dependent. Dimensions exist only for the W7500: 216 mm length, 115 mm height, 20 mm width. The Arc Pro B370 has no listed dimensions. Release dates are 2023-08-02 for the W7500 and 2026-01-26 for the Arc Pro B370. The launch MSRP of 429 USD applies only to the W7500, with no MSRP for the Arc Pro B370.