AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains only one benchmark result for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER, and none for the AMD Radeon PRO W7400. This makes a direct benchmark-to-benchmark comparison impossible, but the available figures still reveal a clear performance hierarchy.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. That score places it at the 19th percentile among all GPUs in the database, meaning roughly 81% of recorded graphics cards score higher. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Arc Pro B60 with an average score of 3182, the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 with 3163, the NVIDIA GeForce 820A with 2983, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M with 2967.

The delta percentages show how close the field is around this result. The RTX 5080 SUPER trails the Intel Arc Pro B60 by 3.4%, trails the Quadro P1000 by 2.8%, leads the GeForce 820A by 3.1%, and leads the GTX 860M by 3.6%. These are narrow margins, all within roughly 4% of each other. For a card with the RTX 5080 SUPER's specifications, this benchmark outcome appears unexpectedly weak relative to its hardware configuration, a point that warrants attention in the verdict section.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has no benchmark entries in the database, so it cannot be compared on a measured basis. Its percentile rank is 50, which is a neutral midpoint value, but it is not derived from any recorded test score. The absence of data means no wins can be awarded to either card in the head-to-head benchmarks. The wins counter shows 0 for both items.

What the data does provide is a specification-based comparison. The RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the W7400 delivers 7.885 TFLOPS. That is a ratio of roughly 7.1 to 1 in raw shading throughput. Texture rate tells a similar story: 879.3 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s, a factor of about 7.1. Pixel rate differs by a smaller margin, 293.1 GPixel/s versus 70.40 GPixel/s, a factor of roughly 4.2. Memory bandwidth is the most lopsided specification: 1.02 TB/s versus 172.8 GB/s, a factor of about 5.9. The RTX 5080 SUPER also carries 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, against 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus for the W7400.

The RTX 5080 SUPER further leads in shader resources with 10752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, 112 ROPs, 84 ray tracing cores, and 336 tensor cores. The W7400 has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores, with no tensor cores listed. Clock speeds also favor the NVIDIA card: 2295 MHz base and 2617 MHz boost versus 330 MHz base and 1100 MHz boost for the AMD card. The memory clock is higher as well, 2000 MHz (32 Gbps effective) versus 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective).

The Verdict

The data indicates a decisive overall performance advantage for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER in every measurable hardware category. Its FP32 compute is roughly 7.1 times higher, its texture rate is roughly 7.1 times higher, its pixel rate is roughly 4.2 times higher, and its memory bandwidth is roughly 5.9 times higher. It also has three times the memory capacity, 24 GB versus 8 GB, and a substantially larger shader complex.

However, the single recorded benchmark score complicates that picture. A 3075 score at the 19th percentile, with nearest rivals within roughly 4% in either direction, does not reflect the hardware advantage described above. The RTX 5080 SUPER's specification sheet suggests a far higher standing in the database, yet the measured result places it among much older and weaker cards such as the Quadro P1000 and GTX 860M. This discrepancy is the central finding of the recorded data, and any user relying on the benchmark alone would conclude the card performs at a modest level.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400, by contrast, has no measured score at all. Its 55 W TDP, single-slot design, and lack of power connectors indicate a low-power professional card intended for compact or power-constrained systems. The RTX 5080 SUPER uses a 415 W TDP, a dual-slot cooler, and a 16-pin power connector, which places it in an entirely different power and physical class. The W7400 draws roughly 13% of the RTX 5080 SUPER's power budget while delivering roughly 14% of its FP32 performance, so the efficiency ratio is similar on paper, but the absolute capabilities are not.

For users prioritizing maximum compute, memory capacity, and bandwidth, the RTX 5080 SUPER is the clear selection. For users needing a low-power, single-slot card with four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs and no external power requirement, the W7400 is the only viable option in this comparison. The RTX 5080 SUPER also supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the W7400 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which matters for systems with newer platforms.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different manufacturers and different architectural generations. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish, and belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. It is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process node, contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, and achieves a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER uses the GB203 chip built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture and belongs to the GeForce 50 generation. It is also fabricated by TSMC, but on a 5 nm process node, and contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. Its transistor density is 120.6 million per square millimeter, nearly double that of the W7400.

The transistor count difference is substantial: the RTX 5080 SUPER packs roughly 3.4 times as many transistors as the W7400. The die size is roughly 1.85 times larger. The process node advantage belongs to NVIDIA, with 5 nm versus 6 nm, which contributes to the higher transistor density.

In terms of feature support, both cards expose the same API levels: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The key architectural difference lies in dedicated hardware. The RTX 5080 SUPER includes 336 tensor cores, which are absent from the W7400's specification list. Ray tracing hardware exists on both, but the RTX 5080 SUPER has 84 ray tracing cores versus 28 on the W7400. The W7400 has no tensor core entry at all, indicating a lack of dedicated AI acceleration hardware, while the RTX 5080 SUPER's tensor cores enable AI workloads that the AMD card cannot accelerate natively.

Memory architecture also differs fundamentally. The W7400 uses GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, while the RTX 5080 SUPER uses GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus. The newer memory type and wider bus combine to deliver 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth, roughly 5.9 times the W7400's 172.8 GB/s. The RTX 5080 SUPER also runs its memory at 2000 MHz (32 Gbps effective) compared to 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective) on the W7400.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher raw compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 delivers 7.885 TFLOPS, a ratio of roughly 7.1 to 1 in favor of the NVIDIA card.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, while the W7400 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: What power connector does each card require?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER uses a single 16-pin power connector and has a 415 W TDP. The W7400 has no power connectors and a 55 W TDP.

Q: Does the AMD card have tensor cores?

A: No tensor cores are listed for the AMD Radeon PRO W7400. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER includes 336 tensor cores.

Q: What is the RTX 5080 SUPER's recorded benchmark score?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, placing it at the 19th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Q: What display outputs does each card offer?

A: The W7400 offers 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The RTX 5080 SUPER offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER wins in every performance category with recorded data. Its FP32 throughput of 56.28 TFLOPS dwarfs the W7400's 7.885 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s is roughly 7.1 times the W7400's 123.2 GTexel/s. Its pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s is roughly 4.2 times the W7400's 70.40 GPixel/s. Memory bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s is roughly 5.9 times the W7400's 172.8 GB/s. The RTX 5080 SUPER also has 24 GB of memory versus 8 GB, 10752 shading units versus 1792, 84 ray tracing cores versus 28, and 336 tensor cores versus none. It supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the W7400 uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Its boost clock of 2617 MHz is more than double the W7400's 1100 MHz boost.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 wins in power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 55 W TDP is roughly 13% of the RTX 5080 SUPER's 415 W TDP. It requires no power connectors, while the RTX 5080 SUPER requires a 16-pin connector. It is a single-slot card measuring 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width, compared to the RTX 5080 SUPER's dual-slot design at 304 mm, 137 mm, and 40 mm. The W7400 is roughly 55% shorter and roughly half the height and width of the RTX 5080 SUPER. It also offers four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs versus the RTX 5080 SUPER's combination of one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. For systems with tight space constraints, no spare power cables, or low power budgets, the W7400 is the only card that fits. The RTX 5080 SUPER is listed with no suggested PSU figure, while the W7400 lists a 250 W suggested PSU, reinforcing the lower system power requirement.

In the benchmark arena, the RTX 5080 SUPER's single recorded score of 3075 places it within 3.6% of its nearest rivals in either direction, which means it does not dominate its immediate peer group in measured performance. The W7400 has no benchmark scores, so there is no measured basis for claiming a win in any test.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification field. The process node differs: 6 nm for the W7400 versus 5 nm for the RTX 5080 SUPER. Transistor counts differ substantially: 13,300 million versus 45,600 million. Die size differs: 204 mm² versus 378 mm². Transistor density differs: 65.2 million per mm² versus 120.6 million per mm².

Clock speeds differ across the board. The W7400 runs at 330 MHz base and 1100 MHz boost, while the RTX 5080 SUPER runs at 2295 MHz base and 2617 MHz boost. Memory clocks differ: 1350 MHz with 10.8 Gbps effective for the W7400 versus 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective for the RTX 5080 SUPER.

Memory configuration differs completely: 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth for the W7400, versus 24 GB GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth for the RTX 5080 SUPER.

Compute resources differ: the W7400 has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 84 ray tracing cores, and 336 tensor cores. The W7400 has no tensor cores listed.

Rates differ: pixel rate is 70.40 GPixel/s for the W7400 versus 293.1 GPixel/s for the RTX 5080 SUPER. Texture rate is 123.2 GTexel/s versus 879.3 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 performance are both 7.885 TFLOPS for the W7400 and 56.28 TFLOPS for the RTX 5080 SUPER, with both cards offering 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratios.

Power and physical specifications differ: the W7400 has a 55 W TDP, is single-slot, has no power connectors, and lists a 250 W suggested PSU. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a 415 W TDP, is dual-slot, uses a 16-pin power connector, and lists no suggested PSU. The W7400 measures 168 mm by 69 mm by 20 mm, while the RTX 5080 SUPER measures 304 mm by 137 mm by 40 mm.

Bus interfaces differ: PCIe 4.0 x8 for the W7400 versus PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RTX 5080 SUPER. Display outputs differ: 4x DisplayPort 2.1 for the W7400 versus 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b for the RTX 5080 SUPER. API support is identical: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 on both cards. Release dates differ, with the W7400 released earlier than the RTX 5080 SUPER. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a launch MSRP of 999 USD. The W7400 has no launch MSRP listed. Both cards are marked as Active in production status. The W7400's predecessor is listed as the Radeon Pro Vega, while the RTX 5080 SUPER has no predecessor listed, and neither card has a successor listed.