AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 and the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither part has a nonzero average benchmark score. Both GPUs sit at the 50th percentile versus all GPUs in the database, meaning neither has a measured performance edge over the other in the current dataset.

What the data does show is a substantial theoretical compute gap based on the recorded specifications. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 delivers 7.885 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile delivers 1,382.4 GFLOPS, which is 1.3824 TFLOPS. The Radeon PRO W7400 therefore provides roughly 5.7 times the FP32 compute of the Intel part. In FP16 workloads, the Radeon PRO W7400 also delivers 7.885 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile delivers 2.765 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The AMD part holds a 2.85x FP16 advantage.

Pixel throughput follows the same pattern. The Radeon PRO W7400 reaches 70.40 GPixel/s, while the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile reaches 14.40 GPixel/s. That is a 4.89x difference in favor of AMD. Texture fill rates show a 2.85x gap: the Radeon PRO W7400 outputs 123.2 GTexel/s versus 43.20 GTexel/s for the Intel mobile graphics.

Because the head-to-head benchmark array is empty, these figures represent the only quantitative comparison available. The absence of direct test scores means the database cannot confirm real-world application performance differences, but the specification-level deltas are consistent across every recorded throughput metric.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 records 7.885 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile records 1,382.4 GFLOPS. The AMD part is about 5.7 times higher.

Q: What memory configurations do these GPUs use?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile uses System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: No. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1).

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has a 55 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile has a 28 W TDP and no suggested PSU is recorded.

Q: Which GPU has ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 includes 28 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile has no recorded RT core count.

Q: What is the release timeline for these two products?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile was released on December 13, 2023. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 was released on August 2, 2025. Both are currently marked as Active in production status.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses the Navi 33 chip built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation and is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, producing a transistor density of 65.2M per mm².

The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile uses the Meteor Lake chip built on the Xe-LPG architecture. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Meteor Lake) generation and is fabricated by Intel on a 10 nm process. The database does not record transistor count, die size, or transistor density for this part.

The Radeon PRO W7400 is a discrete add-in board with a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a Ring Bus interface. The AMD card uses a single-slot form factor measuring 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The Intel part has no recorded dimensions because it is integrated into a mobile processor package.

The Radeon PRO W7400 has a dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory subsystem with a 128-bit bus and 172.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile relies on System Shared memory with a System Shared bus width and System Dependent bandwidth. This is a fundamental architectural difference: the AMD part has its own memory pool, while the Intel part shares system memory.

Display output differs as well. The Radeon PRO W7400 provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, making it suited for multi-display workstation setups. The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile lists display outputs as Portable Device Dependent, meaning the number and type of outputs depend on the host laptop design.

The AMD architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and includes 28 dedicated ray tracing cores. The Intel architecture supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and has no recorded ray tracing core count. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

The Radeon PRO W7400 has a 55 W TDP, requires no power connectors, and lists a 250 W suggested PSU. The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile has a 28 W TDP with no power connector data and no suggested PSU, consistent with its integrated design drawing power from the host platform.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two GPUs in the database:

• Process Node: AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses 6 nm (TSMC); Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile uses 10 nm (Intel).
• Transistors: AMD records 13,300 million; Intel records none.
• Die Size: AMD records 204 mm²; Intel records none.
• Base Clock: AMD records 330 MHz; Intel records 300 MHz.
• Boost Clock: AMD records 1100 MHz; Intel records 1800 MHz.
• Memory Clock: AMD records 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective); Intel records System Shared.
• Memory Size: AMD records 8 GB GDDR6; Intel records System Shared.
• Memory Bus Width: AMD records 128 bit; Intel records System Shared.
• Memory Bandwidth: AMD records 172.8 GB/s; Intel records System Dependent.
• Shading Units: AMD records 1792; Intel records 384.
• TMUs: AMD records 112; Intel records 24.
• ROPs: AMD records 64; Intel records 8.
• RT Cores: AMD records 28; Intel records none.
• Pixel Rate: AMD records 70.40 GPixel/s; Intel records 14.40 GPixel/s.
• Texture Rate: AMD records 123.2 GTexel/s; Intel records 43.20 GTexel/s.
• FP32: AMD records 7.885 TFLOPS; Intel records 1,382.4 GFLOPS.
• FP16: AMD records 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1); Intel records 2.765 TFLOPS (2:1).
• TDP: AMD records 55 W; Intel records 28 W.
• Slot Width: AMD records Single-slot; Intel records IGP.
• Bus Interface: AMD records PCIe 4.0 x8; Intel records Ring Bus.
• Display Outputs: AMD records 4x DisplayPort 2.1; Intel records Portable Device Dependent.
• DirectX Support: AMD records 12 Ultimate (12_2); Intel records 12 (12_1).
• Dimensions: AMD records 168 mm, 69 mm, 20 mm; Intel records no dimensions.
• Release Date: AMD records August 2, 2025; Intel records December 13, 2023.
• Predecessor: AMD records Radeon Pro Vega; Intel records HD Graphics-M.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows two GPUs with different intended roles. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 is a discrete workstation card with a dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory pool, 1792 shading units, 28 ray tracing cores, and a 55 W TDP. The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile is an integrated mobile GPU with 384 shading units, no dedicated memory, no recorded RT cores, and a 28 W TDP.

Every recorded throughput metric favors the AMD part. FP32 compute is 5.7x higher, FP16 compute is 2.85x higher, pixel rate is 4.89x higher, and texture rate is 2.85x higher. The AMD card also supports a higher DirectX feature level (12 Ultimate versus 12_1) and offers four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs for multi-monitor workstation use.

The Intel part has two recorded advantages. It has a higher boost clock at 1800 MHz versus 1100 MHz, though this does not overcome the large shading unit deficit. It also has a lower TDP at 28 W versus 55 W, which suits mobile platforms where power is constrained.

The database contains no benchmark scores or nearest rival data for either GPU, so the verdict rests entirely on specification comparison. The Radeon PRO W7400 is the stronger compute device on every metric the database records. The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile is the lower-power integrated alternative for systems that cannot accommodate a dedicated card.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 wins in all raw compute categories. It leads in FP32 throughput with 7.885 TFLOPS versus 1,382.4 GFLOPS, making it the choice for floating-point intensive workloads. It leads in FP16 with equal 1:1 throughput, while the Intel part uses a 2:1 ratio that halves effective FP16 performance relative to its FP32 rate. The AMD card also wins in pixel fill (70.40 GPixel/s versus 14.40 GPixel/s), texture fill (123.2 GTexel/s versus 43.20 GTexel/s), and ray tracing capability with 28 dedicated RT cores.

The Radeon PRO W7400 additionally wins in memory configuration. Its 8 GB GDDR6 pool with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth provides predictable, dedicated bandwidth, whereas the Intel part depends on System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth. The AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, enabling the full 12_2 feature set, and its 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs suit fixed multi-display workstation deployments.

The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile wins in power efficiency and form factor. Its 28 W TDP is less than half the AMD card's 55 W TDP. As an IGP with a Ring Bus interface, it requires no power connectors, no slot space, and no suggested PSU. It integrates directly into a Meteor Lake mobile processor, so it fits into portable devices without expansion slots. The Intel part also has a higher boost clock (1800 MHz versus 1100 MHz), which narrows the gap in lightly threaded tasks that cannot use the full shading unit array.

The Intel part was released earlier, on December 13, 2023, versus August 2, 2025 for the AMD card, so it has been in the market longer. Both GPUs remain Active in production status. For applications that need maximum recorded throughput, dedicated memory, and ray tracing, the Radeon PRO W7400 is the clear selection. For low-power integrated mobile graphics, the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile is the only one of the two that fits that form factor.