AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs Intel Arc Graphics 32EU Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains only one benchmark result for this pairing. The Intel Arc Graphics 32EU has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 733, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This absence of data for the AMD part means a direct numeric comparison cannot be established from the recorded measurements. The Intel solution sits at the 3rd percentile of all GPUs in the database, which places it below the vast majority of recorded graphics hardware. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 holds a 50th percentile ranking, indicating it sits at the median of all recorded GPUs, though this is based on the database's overall positioning rather than a specific workload score.

The Intel Arc Graphics 32EU's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its 733 score. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU and Intel Arc Graphics 64EU both record identical average scores of 733, resulting in a 0 percent delta. The AMD Radeon HD 6470M trails at 723, which is 1.4 percent behind the Intel part. On the other side, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M scores 751, putting it 2.4 percent ahead of the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU. These comparisons indicate that the Intel integrated solution performs in a narrow band alongside older discrete mobile GPUs and other low-end Intel Arc variants.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear separation between these two products. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 is a dedicated discrete graphics card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, a 128-bit memory bus, and 172.8 GB/s of bandwidth. Its 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units far exceed the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU's 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. The AMD card delivers 7.885 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel integrated part delivers 998.4 GFLOPS. This is a substantial gap in raw compute throughput, with the AMD card offering roughly eight times the FP32 throughput of the Intel solution.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 also includes 28 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU lists no ray tracing cores in its specifications. The AMD card's pixel rate of 70.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 123.2 GTexel/s dwarf the Intel part's 15.60 GPixel/s and 31.20 GTexel/s. For any workload that depends on rasterization throughput, texture filtering, or memory bandwidth, the AMD discrete card holds a decisive advantage based on the specification data.

The Intel Arc Graphics 32EU is an integrated graphics processor within the Arrow Lake-S chip, using system shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent. It has a higher boost clock at 1950 MHz compared to the AMD card's 1100 MHz boost, and it draws 65 W versus the AMD card's 55 W TDP. However, the higher clock does not compensate for the far smaller execution resource pool. The Intel part's FP16 throughput of 1.997 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio indicates it processes FP16 at twice the rate of FP32, whereas the AMD card maintains a 1:1 ratio at 7.885 TFLOPS for both formats.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 is the only choice for tasks requiring discrete memory, high bandwidth, or dedicated ray tracing hardware. The Intel part's 3rd percentile ranking and its rivalry with GPUs from over a decade ago, such as the GeForce GT 415M, confirm it targets basic display output and light workloads. The AMD card's 50th percentile placement and active production status position it as a mid-range professional solution.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 delivers 7.885 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, compared to 998.4 GFLOPS for the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU.

Q: How does the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 32EU scores 733 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. It matches the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU and Intel Arc Graphics 64EU with a 0 percent delta, sits 1.4 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 6470M, and trails the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M by 2.4 percent.

Q: What memory configurations do these two GPUs use?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 32EU uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Which GPU has a larger number of shading units?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has 1792 shading units, while the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU has 256 shading units.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU uses a 3 nm process at TSMC.

Specification Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 is built on the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, as part of the Radeon Pro Navi generation. It uses a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The Intel Arc Graphics 32EU uses the Arrow Lake-S chip with Xe-LPG architecture as part of the Arc Graphics-M generation. It uses a 3 nm process at TSMC with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 73.3M per mm².

The AMD card has base and boost clocks of 330 MHz and 1100 MHz respectively, with memory clocked at 1350 MHz for 10.8 Gbps effective. The Intel part has a 300 MHz base clock and a 1950 MHz boost clock, with system shared memory. The AMD card offers 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel part relies on system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

The AMD card has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. The AMD card's pixel rate is 70.40 GPixel/s and texture rate is 123.2 GTexel/s, versus 15.60 GPixel/s and 31.20 GTexel/s for the Intel part.

The AMD card has a 55 W TDP, is single-slot, requires no power connectors, and suggests a 250 W PSU. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface and provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The Intel part has a 65 W TDP, is an IGP with a Ring Bus interface, and its display outputs are motherboard dependent. The AMD card measures 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The Intel part has no recorded dimensions.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 was released on 2025-08-02 and is in active production. The Intel Arc Graphics 32EU was released on 2024-10-23 and is also in active production. The AMD card's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, while the Intel part's predecessor is the HD Graphics-M.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture, which is AMD's third-generation Radeon DNA design. The Intel Arc Graphics 32EU uses the Xe-LPG architecture, Intel's low-power graphics architecture for integrated solutions. The AMD chip is codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, while the Intel chip is based on Arrow Lake-S.

The AMD architecture implements 28 dedicated ray tracing cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced workloads. The Intel part lists no ray tracing cores, indicating it lacks this dedicated hardware. The AMD card's FP16 throughput matches its FP32 throughput at a 1:1 ratio, both at 7.885 TFLOPS. The Intel part processes FP16 at 1.997 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, meaning its FP16 rate is twice its FP32 rate.

The AMD card uses discrete GDDR6 memory with a dedicated 128-bit memory bus, while the Intel part shares system memory with a bus width and bandwidth described as system dependent. This architectural difference is fundamental: the AMD card has reserved, high-bandwidth memory, whereas the Intel integrated GPU must compete with the CPU and other system components for memory access.

The AMD card uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface for host communication, while the Intel part uses a Ring Bus interface, reflecting its integration into the Arrow Lake-S processor. The AMD card is a single-slot discrete card with 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs and no power connectors, while the Intel part is an IGP with motherboard dependent display outputs.

The AMD architecture is fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC process with 13,300 million transistors across a 204 mm² die. The Intel architecture uses a more advanced 3 nm TSMC process with 17,800 million transistors across a larger 243 mm² die. Despite the smaller transistor count, the AMD die achieves higher absolute performance in every measured throughput category, which reflects the execution resource allocation rather than process technology alone.

Both architectures support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both are in active production. The AMD card's 55 W TDP is lower than the Intel part's 65 W TDP, and the AMD card suggests a 250 W system PSU, while the Intel part has no suggested PSU because it draws power through the host platform.