AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs Intel Arc Graphics 24EU Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 and the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU. The database contains no shared test scores for these two parts, so the comparison must be built from each product's own measured performance and its position relative to other GPUs.

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU has a single recorded benchmark result: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 733. That score places the integrated graphics solution in the 3rd percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the database are Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and Intel Arc Graphics 64EU, both with an identical average score of 733, representing a 0% difference. The AMD Radeon HD 6470M trails slightly at 723, which is 1.4% below the Arc 24EU, while the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M sits at 751, putting the Arc 24EU 2.4% behind that part.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400, by contrast, has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. Its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, which places it squarely in the middle of the performance distribution, but the absence of measured scores means the head-to-head comparison cannot rely on direct test data. The wins counters for both products are 0, reflecting the lack of overlapping benchmarks.

What the data does show is the scale of the gap in raw specifications. The Radeon PRO W7400 delivers 7.885 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Arc 24EU manages 768.0 GFLOPS. That is a difference of more than an order of magnitude, with the AMD part offering roughly 10 times the single-precision throughput. Pixel throughput follows a similar pattern: 70.40 GPixel/s for the Radeon PRO W7400 versus 12.00 GPixel/s for the Arc 24EU. Texture rate is 123.2 GTexel/s versus 24.00 GTexel/s, a more than five-fold advantage for the discrete card.

Memory bandwidth is another major divider. The Radeon PRO W7400 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 172.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc 24EU relies on system shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent, which in practice ties performance to the host platform's memory configuration. The AMD card has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, while the Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 6 ROPs. The Radeon also includes 28 ray tracing cores; the Arc 24EU lists no ray tracing cores in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two products come from different design philosophies and process technologies. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 is built on the Navi 33 chip using the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, specifically the Navi III Series. The manufacturing process is 6 nm at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors packed into a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter.

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU uses the Arrow Lake-S chip with the Xe-LPG architecture and belongs to the Arc Graphics generation for Arrow Lake. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 73.3 million transistors per square millimeter. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor (IGP), while the AMD part is a discrete, single-slot card.

The physical form factor reflects this distinction. The Radeon PRO W7400 measures 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width, uses a single-slot design, and requires no power connectors. The Arc 24EU has no recorded dimensions because it is an IGP, integrated into the host processor, with its power delivery and cooling handled by the system. The AMD card's suggested power supply is 250 W, while the Intel part has no such figure in the database.

The memory architectures are fundamentally different. The Radeon PRO W7400 has dedicated GDDR6 memory with a fixed bus width and bandwidth, while the Arc 24EU uses system shared memory, meaning its performance depends on the host system's memory subsystem. Clock behavior also differs: the AMD card lists a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1100 MHz, with memory at 1350 MHz or 10.8 Gbps effective. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost of 2000 MHz, but its memory clock is tied to the system.

The bus interface separates the two as well. The Radeon PRO W7400 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, a standard expansion slot interface. The Arc 24EU uses a Ring Bus, reflecting its position on the processor die rather than as a separate card. Display outputs also differ: the AMD card provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1, while the Intel IGP's outputs are motherboard dependent.

Both products support the same API feature levels: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel part additionally lists FP16 at 1.536 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the AMD part lists FP16 at 7.885 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, meaning the Radeon treats FP16 and FP32 at the same throughput.

FAQ

Q: Which product has the higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 delivers 7.885 TFLOPS of FP32, while the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU delivers 768.0 GFLOPS, giving the AMD card roughly ten times the single-precision throughput.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU have dedicated memory?

A: No, the Arc 24EU uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth, whereas the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 172.8 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 is built on a 6 nm TSMC process, while the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU uses a 3 nm TSMC process, giving the Intel part a density of 73.3M transistors per mm² versus 65.2M for the AMD part.

Q: How does the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Arc 24EU scores 733 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, matching the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and 64EU exactly with a 0% delta, while the AMD Radeon HD 6470M scores 723 (1.4% lower) and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M scores 751 (2.4% higher).

Q: Which product has ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 includes 28 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU lists no ray tracing cores in the database.

Q: What are the physical form factors?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 is a single-slot discrete card measuring 168 mm by 69 mm by 20 mm with no power connectors, while the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is an IGP with no listed dimensions and motherboard-dependent display outputs.

The Verdict

The data makes the segmentation clear. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 is a discrete workstation card aimed at rendering and compute tasks, with dedicated memory, a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, and a full complement of fixed-function units including ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is an integrated solution for Arrow Lake processors, sharing system memory and relying on the host platform for bandwidth and display connectivity.

For raw performance, the Radeon PRO W7400 holds a massive advantage in every measured throughput metric. Its FP32 output of 7.885 TFLOPS dwarfs the Arc 24EU's 768.0 GFLOPS. Pixel rate is 70.40 GPixel/s versus 12.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 123.2 GTexel/s versus 24.00 GTexel/s. Memory bandwidth is 172.8 GB/s versus system dependent, which in most configurations will be far lower for the IGP.

The Intel part does have advantages in process technology. Its 3 nm node is more advanced than the AMD card's 6 nm node, and it packs more transistors per square millimeter (73.3M versus 65.2M). The Arc 24EU also boosts to a higher clock speed of 2000 MHz versus 1100 MHz for the Radeon, but that higher clock cannot compensate for the vast difference in shading units, TMUs, and ROPs.

The benchmark data shows the Arc 24EU sitting in the 3rd percentile of all GPUs, surrounded by older discrete mobile parts like the GeForce GT 415M and the Radeon HD 6470M. The Radeon PRO W7400 sits at the 50th percentile, indicating a median position in the overall GPU distribution, though its lack of recorded benchmark scores means its exact standing cannot be quantified from the database.

For users who need a discrete card with dedicated VRAM, multiple DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, and workstation-class compute capabilities, the Radeon PRO W7400 is the clear choice from the data. For systems that require integrated graphics with no expansion card, the Arc 24EU serves as an entry-level IGP, matching the performance of other Arc variants with 32EU and 64EU configurations in the recorded test.

The Radeon PRO W7400 also has a longer product history context, with its predecessor listed as the Radeon Pro Vega, while the Arc 24EU succeeds HD Graphics. Both products remain in active production status. The AMD card was released on August 2, 2025, while the Intel part launched on October 23, 2024. Neither product has a recorded launch MSRP in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon PRO W7400 | Intel Arc Graphics 24EU |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe-LPG |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 3 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 17,800 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 243 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 73.3M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 330 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | System Shared |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Bus Width | 128 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 172.8 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 192 |

| TMUs | 112 | 12 |

| ROPs | 64 | 6 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 70.40 GPixel/s | 12.00 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 24.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 7.885 TFLOPS | 768.0 GFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1) | 1.536 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 65 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | None | None |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | Not listed |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | Ring Bus |

| Display Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | Motherboard Dependent |

| Dimensions | 168 mm x 69 mm x 20 mm | Not listed |

| Release Date | 2025-08-02 | 2024-10-23 |

| Predecessor | Radeon Pro Vega | HD Graphics |