AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no benchmark entries for either the AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D or the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. Consequently, there are no measured performance scores, no frame rate comparisons, and no synthetic test results to rank one card against the other. The database lists zero wins for each product, and the average benchmark score for both is zero. The percentile versus all GPUs is identical for both at 50, placing each in the middle of the distribution, but this figure is not derived from any recorded benchmark run.

What can be compared directly is theoretical compute output. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D delivers 24.82 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. The difference is 0.24 TFLOPS, or roughly 1% in favor of the AMD part. That margin is within measurement noise for most workloads, but it does mean the AMD card holds a slight mathematical edge in single-precision floating-point throughput. In FP16, the situation reverses notably. The AMD card produces 24.82 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning it does not gain any extra throughput from reduced precision. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX produces 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, effectively doubling its FP16 output. That is 98% higher than the AMD card's FP16 figure, a substantial theoretical advantage for workloads that use half-precision arithmetic.

Pixel and texture throughput are nearly identical. The AMD card reaches 193.9 GPixel/s and 387.8 GTexel/s, while the Lisuan card reaches 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The AMD card leads by 1% in both categories, consistent with its FP32 margin. These differences are too small to be perceptible in real-world rendering, but they do show that the two cards are engineered to similar rasterization ceilings.

Memory bandwidth tells a different story. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D has 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 432.0 GB/s. That is a 33% advantage for the AMD card. The larger memory bus (256 bit versus 192 bit) and the same 2250 MHz memory clock (18 Gbps effective) explain the gap. For bandwidth-sensitive tasks such as high-resolution texturing, large dataset loads, or compute kernels that stream data, the AMD card has a clear theoretical lead.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D uses the Navi 48 chip built on RDNA 4.0, part of the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi IV Series) generation. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die. That yields a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip with the TrueGPU architecture, from the 7G100 generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, but its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

The process node difference is significant: 4 nm versus 6 nm. The smaller node allows the AMD chip to pack more transistors into a smaller area, which typically improves power efficiency and switching speed. The AMD card's 150 W TDP against the Lisuan card's 225 W TDP reflects this efficiency, though the two cards have identical shading unit counts per watt in different ways (more on this below).

Core configuration differs sharply. The AMD card has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The Lisuan card has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Lisuan card has exactly double the shading units of the AMD card, yet it produces nearly the same FP32 throughput. This indicates that the AMD architecture achieves higher per-shader efficiency, or that the TrueGPU architecture dedicates many of its shaders to other functions. The AMD card also includes 48 dedicated ray tracing cores, while the Lisuan card does not list any RT cores. This gives the AMD part a structural advantage for hardware-accelerated ray tracing workloads. Neither card lists tensor cores, so AI acceleration relies on standard shader or RT hardware.

Memory capacity and bus width differ as well. The AMD card has 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256 bit bus, while the Lisuan card has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus. Both use 2250 MHz memory with 18 Gbps effective transfer, but the AMD card's wider bus produces substantially higher bandwidth. The AMD card also supports PCIe 5.0 x16, whereas the Lisuan card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, doubling the theoretical link bandwidth for host communication.

API support is close but not identical. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The AMD card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs also differ: the AMD card has a single DisplayPort 2.1a connector, while the Lisuan card has four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. The AMD card supports the newer DisplayPort standard, while the Lisuan card offers more simultaneous display connections.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 6144 shading units, exactly double the 3072 shading units of the AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D. Despite this, the AMD card produces slightly higher FP32 throughput (24.82 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS).

Q: How do the memory bandwidth figures compare?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D delivers 576.0 GB/s over a 256 bit bus, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 432.0 GB/s over a 192 bit bus. The AMD card leads by 33%.

Q: Does either card support hardware ray tracing?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D includes 48 dedicated ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX does not list any ray tracing cores in the database.

Q: What is the FP16 performance difference?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX produces 49.15 TFLOPS in FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, which is 98% higher than the AMD card's 24.82 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

Q: Which card is more power efficient?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D has a 150 W TDP, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a 225 W TDP. The AMD card also uses a 4 nm process compared to the Lisuan card's 6 nm process.

Q: How many display outputs does each card have?

A: The AMD card has one DisplayPort 2.1a output. The Lisuan card has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D | Lisuan Tech LX MAX |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 48 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Radeon Pro Navi (Navi IV Series) | 7G100 |

| Process node | 4 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 53,900 million | Unknown |

| Die size | 357 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor density | 151.0M / mm² | null |

| Memory size | 32 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 3072 | 6144 |

| RT cores | 48 | null |

| FP32 performance | 24.82 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 performance | 24.82 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Pixel rate | 193.9 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 387.8 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 150 W | 225 W |

| Slot width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Dimensions | 241 mm L, 111 mm H, 19 mm W | 248 mm L, 118 mm H, 48 mm W |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 1x DisplayPort 2.1a | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Release date | 2025-12-10 | 2026-03-16 |

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX are theoretically matched in several core metrics but diverge sharply in memory capacity, bandwidth, and FP16 throughput. The AMD card wins on FP32 compute by 1%, pixel rate by 1%, texture rate by 1%, memory bandwidth by 33%, memory capacity (32 GB versus 12 GB), and power efficiency (150 W versus 225 W). It also has hardware ray tracing cores, a newer process node, a faster PCIe interface, and a newer DisplayPort standard. The Lisuan card wins decisively on FP16 compute, delivering 49.15 TFLOPS against the AMD card's 24.82 TFLOPS. It also offers double the shading units (6144 versus 3072) and four display outputs against one.

For users whose workloads depend on single-precision compute, memory bandwidth, large memory allocations, or ray tracing, the AMD card is the clear choice based on the recorded specifications. For users who need half-precision throughput, such as certain machine learning inference or training loops, the Lisuan card's FP16 advantage is substantial. The Lisuan card's dual-slot design and 225 W TDP also signal a higher power draw, which may factor into system design decisions. The AMD card's single-slot form factor and lower TDP make it easier to integrate into dense systems.

The release dates are separated by roughly three months, with the AMD card launching on 2025-12-10 and the Lisuan card on 2026-03-16. Both cards are listed as Active in production status. Neither card has a recorded launch MSRP in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D wins in scenarios that stress memory bandwidth and capacity. Its 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 32 GB of GDDR6 memory provide a 33% bandwidth advantage and a 20 GB capacity advantage over the Lisuan card. Large dataset processing, high-resolution texture streaming, and compute kernels that iterate over big buffers will benefit from this margin. Its 48 ray tracing cores give it a structural advantage in hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which the Lisuan card lacks entirely. Its 4 nm process and 150 W TDP make it the more efficient option, and its single-slot design fits into tighter chassis configurations. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface doubles the link speed compared to the Lisuan card's PCIe 4.0 x16, reducing data transfer bottlenecks for frequently swapped workloads.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in half-precision compute. Its 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 throughput is 98% above the AMD card, which makes it the stronger theoretical choice for FP16-heavy tasks such as certain AI inference pipelines, half-precision training, and mixed-precision rendering paths. Its 6144 shading units provide a large pool of execution resources, even if the FP32 output is nearly identical to the AMD card. Its four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor configurations directly, whereas the AMD card requires a hub or adapter for more than one display. The Lisuan card's 12 GB of memory, while smaller, may be sufficient for workloads that do not need large resident datasets.

Both cards share identical TMU and ROP counts (192 and 96, respectively), so texture filtering and pixel output capacity are theoretically equal. The AMD card's slight leads in pixel rate (193.9 versus 192.0 GPixel/s) and texture rate (387.8 versus 384.0 GTexel/s) are under 1% and unlikely to produce measurable differences in rasterized scenes. The choice between them depends almost entirely on whether the workload favors half-precision throughput (Lisuan) or memory bandwidth, ray tracing, and power efficiency (AMD).