AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D and Intel Arc Pro B370 occupy entirely different positions in the hardware landscape. The AMD part is a discrete, single-slot workstation accelerator built on the Navi 48 chip with RDNA 4.0 architecture, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) embedded in the Panther Lake platform with Xe3-LPG architecture. The data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are recorded in the database, and both cards hold an identical 50th percentile versus all GPUs, with average benchmark scores of zero. Given the absence of measured performance data, the selection between these two parts must be based on architectural and physical characteristics rather than empirical scores.

The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D delivers 24.82 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 32 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and a 150 W TDP. The Intel Arc Pro B370 provides 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, relies on system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, and consumes only 25 W. For workloads that demand high compute throughput and dedicated memory capacity, the AMD part is the clear choice. For low-power, portable devices where the GPU is integrated into the processor package, the Intel part is the only viable option, as the AMD card requires a PCIe 5.0 x16 slot, a 450 W suggested power supply, and a 1x 16-pin power connector.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D uses the Navi 48 chip fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The die measures 357 mm² and contains 53,900 million transistors, resulting in a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². The architecture is RDNA 4.0, and the card belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi IV Series) generation. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1080 MHz and a boost clock of 2020 MHz, with a game clock also listed at 1080 MHz. Memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. Transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown in the database. The architecture is Xe3-LPG, and the GPU belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. The base clock is 300 MHz and the boost clock reaches 2400 MHz. Memory is system shared, meaning the GPU accesses the host system's memory rather than having dedicated VRAM. The bus width and bandwidth are likewise system dependent.

Compute resources differ substantially. The AMD card has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and 48 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores. The AMD GPU achieves a pixel rate of 193.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 387.8 GTexel/s. The Intel GPU achieves 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. FP16 performance on the AMD card is 24.82 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, while the Intel card delivers 12.29 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, indicating that its FP16 throughput is double its FP32 throughput.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card is a single-slot discrete card measuring 241 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 19 mm in width, with a single DisplayPort 2.1a output. The Intel part is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and portable device dependent display outputs. The AMD card was released on 2025-12-10, while the Intel part was released on 2026-01-26. The AMD card's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, and the Intel part's predecessor is the HD Graphics-WM. Both are listed as Active in production status. Neither part has a recorded launch MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no head-to-head benchmark entries between the AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D and the Intel Arc Pro B370. There are no wins recorded for either side, and no comparative performance percentages exist. This absence of measured data means a direct numerical comparison of real-world performance is not possible from the recorded information. What can be compared are the theoretical peak rates and architectural specifications.

The AMD card holds a 4.04x advantage in FP32 compute, delivering 24.82 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS for the Intel part. In pixel throughput, the AMD card processes 193.9 GPixel/s compared to 48.00 GPixel/s, a 4.04x difference. Texture rate shows the same ratio, with 387.8 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s. The AMD card has 2.4x more shading units (3072 versus 1280), 4.8x more TMUs (192 versus 40), and 4.8x more ROPs (96 versus 20). Ray tracing cores number 48 on the AMD card versus 10 on the Intel part, a 4.8x difference.

Memory capacity cannot be directly compared because the Intel part uses system shared memory with no dedicated allocation recorded. The AMD card's 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 576.0 GB/s of dedicated bandwidth. The Intel part's bandwidth is listed as system dependent, so no fixed figure exists in the database. The AMD card's boost clock of 2020 MHz is lower than the Intel part's 2400 MHz boost clock, but the AMD card has a much higher base clock of 1080 MHz versus 300 MHz. The AMD card's power draw of 150 W is six times higher than the Intel part's 25 W TDP, which reflects the fundamental difference between a discrete card with dedicated memory and an integrated GPU sharing system resources.

The FP16 comparison is narrower due to the Intel part's 2:1 FP16 ratio. The AMD card delivers 24.82 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel card delivers 12.29 TFLOPS, a 2.02x advantage for AMD. This indicates the Intel architecture prioritizes FP16 throughput relative to its FP32 capability, though it still trails the AMD card in absolute FP16 performance.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute throughput?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D delivers 24.82 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is 4.04x higher than the Intel Arc Pro B370's 6.144 TFLOPS. The AMD card also leads in FP16 with 24.82 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS.

Q: How do the memory configurations differ?

A: The AMD card has 32 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth and bus width, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM of its own.

Q: What process nodes are used for each GPU?

A: The AMD Navi 48 chip is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Panther Lake chip uses a 3 nm process at Intel's foundry. The AMD chip contains 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, while the Intel chip's transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown.

Q: What are the power requirements for each part?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D has a 150 W TDP and requires a 450 W suggested power supply with a 1x 16-pin power connector. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP and uses no power connectors, as it is an integrated GPU.

Q: Can the Intel Arc Pro B370 be installed in a desktop PCIe slot?

A: No. The Intel part is listed as an IGP with a bus interface of IGP, meaning it is integrated into the processor package. The AMD card uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and is a single-slot discrete card measuring 241 mm in length.

Q: Which GPU supports newer display outputs?

A: The AMD card provides a single DisplayPort 2.1a output. The Intel part's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, which means the connectivity depends on the host device's implementation rather than a fixed set of ports on the GPU itself.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D wins in every category of raw compute capability recorded in the database. Its 24.82 TFLOPS FP32 performance is four times that of the Intel part, and its dedicated 32 GB memory pool with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provides consistent, predictable memory performance that is not dependent on system configuration. The 48 ray tracing cores, 96 ROPs, and 192 TMUs give it substantial geometry and pixel processing capacity. The 193.9 GPixel/s pixel rate and 387.8 GTexel/s texture rate are both 4.04x higher than the Intel part's figures. The card's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and single DisplayPort 2.1a output suit discrete workstation deployments where maximum bandwidth to the host and a high-specification display connection are required. The 150 W TDP, while higher than the Intel part, is modest for a card with this compute density, and the single-slot form factor allows installation in dense server or workstation configurations.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 wins in power efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP is one-sixth of the AMD card's 150 W TDP, making it suitable for portable or low-power devices where dedicated graphics cards cannot be physically accommodated. The 3 nm process node at Intel's foundry is smaller than the 4 nm TSMC node used for the AMD chip, and the 2400 MHz boost clock is higher than the AMD card's 2020 MHz boost. The 2:1 FP16 ratio means the Intel architecture can deliver 12.29 TFLOPS of FP16 performance, which is double its FP32 throughput, a useful characteristic for workloads that operate primarily in reduced precision. The system shared memory design eliminates the need for dedicated VRAM allocation and allows the GPU to access the full system memory pool, which can be advantageous in unified memory architectures where data does not need to be copied between separate memory spaces. The absence of power connectors and the IGP form factor mean no additional power cabling or slot space is required.

The database shows no benchmark wins for either part, so the use-case split must follow the physical and architectural characteristics. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D is positioned for compute-heavy tasks that benefit from dedicated memory bandwidth and high FP32 throughput, such as rendering, simulation, and AI inference workloads that fit within the 32 GB memory capacity. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is positioned for mobile or compact systems where the 25 W power envelope and integrated form factor are mandatory constraints, and where workloads are light enough to run within the FP16-optimized architecture. The AMD card's release on 2025-12-10 predates the Intel part's release on 2026-01-26, and both are currently listed as active in production. Neither card has a predecessor relationship with the other, as the AMD card succeeds the Radeon Pro Vega while the Intel part succeeds the HD Graphics-WM.