AMD Radeon 890M vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Radeon 890M has a substantial set of recorded benchmark scores, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmarks in the database. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible for most tests. The Radeon 890M's average benchmark score is 9210, placing it in the 45th percentile of all GPUs. The Arc Pro B370 sits at the 50th percentile, but with an average score of 0 due to missing data.

Looking at the Radeon 890M's individual results provides context for what the Arc Pro B370 must surpass. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the 890M scores 590. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 37254, and its Vulkan score is 40808. PassMark tests show scores of 33 in DirectX 10, 73 in DirectX 11, 37 in DirectX 12, and 97 in DirectX 9. The PassMark G2D score is 979, G3D is 8076, and GPU compute is 4157.

The nearest rivals to the Radeon 890M include the AMD Radeon Vega 8 with an average score of 9221 and a delta of -0.1 percent, meaning the 890M trails by a negligible margin. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 averages 9273, putting the 890M 0.7 percent behind. The GTX 465 averages 9294, a 0.9 percent gap, and the GTX 850M averages 9302, a 1 percent deficit. These are all essentially statistical ties.

The Arc Pro B370's lack of benchmark data means the database cannot assign it any wins. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and the win count for both parts is zero. Any assessment of relative performance must rely on architectural specifications and the known behavior of the Radeon 890M against its peers.

Architecture Differences

The Radeon 890M uses the Strix Point chip built on RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It contains 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 145.9 million per mm². The Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture, built on a 3 nm process by Intel. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

The Radeon 890M operates with a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. The Arc Pro B370 has a lower base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. Both use system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, so memory performance is tied to the host platform.

Shading unit counts differ significantly. The Radeon 890M has 1024 shading units, while the Arc Pro B370 has 1280. However, the Intel part has fewer texture mapping units at 40 versus 64, and fewer raster operations pipelines at 20 versus 32. The Radeon 890M also has more ray tracing cores at 16 compared to 10 on the Arc Pro B370.

Pixel and texture rates reflect these differences. The Radeon 890M delivers 92.80 GPixel/s and 185.6 GTexel/s. The Arc Pro B370 produces 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. In floating point performance, the Radeon 890M achieves 5.939 TFLOPS for FP32 and the same 5.939 TFLOPS for FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The Arc Pro B370 reaches 6.144 TFLOPS for FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS for FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, meaning it has higher peak FP32 throughput and substantially higher FP16 throughput.

Power consumption differs, with the Radeon 890M rated at 15 W TDP and the Arc Pro B370 at 25 W TDP. Both are integrated graphics processors with no power connectors and portable-device-dependent display outputs. The Radeon 890M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the Arc Pro B370 lists its bus interface simply as IGP.

API support is identical: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Radeon 890M launched on 2024-07-14, while the Arc Pro B370 launched on 2026-01-26. The Radeon 890M's predecessor is Navi II IGP, and the Arc Pro B370's predecessor is HD Graphics-WM.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon 890M wins in any scenario where recorded performance matters, simply because it has data and the Arc Pro B370 does not. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 590 and PassMark G3D score of 8076 provide concrete reference points. The 890M also demonstrates balanced results across API generations, with DirectX 9 and 11 scores of 97 and 73 respectively, while DirectX 10 and 12 scores sit lower at 33 and 37.

The Arc Pro B370 wins on raw compute specifications. Its FP32 throughput of 6.144 TFLOPS exceeds the Radeon 890M's 5.939 TFLOPS by roughly 3.4 percent. Its FP16 output of 12.29 TFLOPS is more than double the Radeon 890M's 5.939 TFLOPS, which matters for workloads that use reduced precision. The Intel part also has 25 percent more shading units, which can help in shader-heavy tasks if the rest of the pipeline does not bottleneck.

The Radeon 890M counters with higher pixel rate and texture rate. Its 92.80 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s gives it a clear advantage in fill-rate-bound scenarios, and its 185.6 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s doubles texture throughput. More ray tracing cores, 16 versus 10, suggest better RT workload handling.

The 3 nm process on the Arc Pro B370 versus the 4 nm process on the Radeon 890M indicates a newer manufacturing node, though the unknown transistor count prevents density analysis. The Radeon 890M's lower 15 W TDP versus 25 W TDP suggests it fits into tighter power envelopes, which matters for thin-and-light laptops.

The database shows the Radeon 890M sits in the 45th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals are all within 1 percent of its average score. This indicates the 890M performs at a level comparable to discrete GPUs from several generations ago. The Arc Pro B370's 50th percentile placement is based on no measured data, so it should be treated as unverified.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the AMD Radeon 890M is the only part with measurable performance. It delivers a 9210 average benchmark score across ten tests, with strong compute results in Geekbench OpenCL at 37254 and Vulkan at 40808. Its PassMark G3D score of 8076 places it in the same performance class as the GTX 960 and GTX 465, both of which are within 1 percent of its average.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 cannot be recommended on measured performance because it has no benchmark scores. Its architectural specifications suggest potential in FP16 workloads and higher shading unit counts, but without data, those specifications remain theoretical. The 50th percentile ranking is assigned without supporting measurements.

Users who need verified performance today should choose the Radeon 890M. It has a complete benchmark profile, a known performance class relative to discrete GPUs, and lower power consumption at 15 W. Users who prioritize raw FP32 throughput on paper might consider the Arc Pro B370, but they would be making that choice without any empirical evidence.

The Radeon 890M's 16 ray tracing cores and higher pixel and texture rates make it the better choice for graphics-intensive applications based on the available data. The Arc Pro B370's 1280 shading units and 2:1 FP16 ratio are interesting specifications, but they do not translate into recorded wins.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher FP32 performance?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, while the AMD Radeon 890M has 5.939 TFLOPS. The Intel part is ahead by roughly 3.4 percent on this specification.

Q: How does the Radeon 890M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Radeon 890M has an average benchmark score of 9210. The AMD Radeon Vega 8 scores 9221, putting the 890M 0.1 percent behind. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 scores 9273, a 0.7 percent gap. The GTX 465 scores 9294, a 0.9 percent deficit, and the GTX 850M scores 9302, a 1 percent difference.

Q: What ray tracing capabilities do these GPUs have?

A: The AMD Radeon 890M has 16 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 has 10. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing requirements.

Q: What are the power consumption figures?

A: The AMD Radeon 890M has a TDP of 15 W, and the Intel Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W. Neither requires external power connectors.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, compared to 1024 on the AMD Radeon 890M. However, the Radeon 890M has more texture mapping units, 64 versus 40, and more raster operations pipelines, 32 versus 20.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 890M | Intel Arc Pro B370 |

|----------------|-----------------|---------------------|

| Chip | Strix Point | Panther Lake |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Xe3-LPG |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 34,000 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | unknown |

| Base Clock | 400 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Shading Units | 1024 | 1280 |

| TMUs | 64 | 40 |

| ROPs | 32 | 20 |

| RT Cores | 16 | 10 |

| Pixel Rate | 92.80 GPixel/s | 48.00 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 185.6 GTexel/s | 96.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 5.939 TFLOPS | 6.144 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 5.939 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 15 W | 25 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | IGP |

| Release Date | 2024-07-14 | 2026-01-26 |

| Predecessor | Navi II IGP | HD Graphics-WM |

| Percentile | 45 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 9210 | 0 |