AMD Radeon 880M vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Radeon 880M has a complete set of recorded benchmark scores, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark results in the database. This makes a direct numeric comparison impossible for most tests. The 880M’s average benchmark score is 8436, which places it at the 43rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in overall average score are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX at 8427 (0.1% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 at 8458 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon HD 8870M at 8462 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Radeon R9 M375X at 8325 (1.3% lower). The LX MAX carries a 50th percentile rating in the database, but with an average benchmark score of zero and no individual test entries, there is no measured data to compare against the 880M’s recorded results.

The 880M’s strongest recorded result is in Geekbench Vulkan with a score of 40006. Its Geekbench OpenCL result is 31285. In Passmark tests, the 880M scores 97 in DirectX 9, 73 in DirectX 11, 32 in DirectX 12, and 31 in DirectX 10. The Passmark G3D score is 7615, the G2D score is 969, and the GPU compute score is 3719. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result is 535. These figures establish a baseline for integrated graphics performance, but the LX MAX’s absence of recorded scores leaves its performance envelope entirely unquantified in the database.

Because the LX MAX has no benchmark entries, the head-to-head section relies on the 880M’s data alone. The 880M’s average score of 8436 sits just above the GTX 675MX’s 8427, a 0.1% advantage. Against the MX330, the 880M trails by 0.3%, a margin of 22 points. The gap against the HD 8870M is also 0.3%, with the 880M behind by 26 points. Against the R9 M375X, the 880M leads by 1.3%, or 111 points. These margins are narrow, indicating that the 880M operates in a tightly packed performance band around these older discrete GPUs.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 880M wins in the category of measured data availability. Every benchmark category in the database has a recorded score for the 880M, from DirectX 9 through DirectX 12, plus compute and synthetic workloads. The LX MAX has no recorded wins in any benchmark because no scores exist for it. The database lists the LX MAX with zero wins and the 880M with zero wins in head-to-head benchmarks, which reflects the absence of paired test results rather than a tie in actual performance.

In terms of intended use, the 880M is an integrated graphics processor with a 15 W TDP, making it suitable for portable devices where power draw is constrained. Its display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, reinforcing its integration into notebooks or handheld systems. The LX MAX is a dual-slot discrete card with a 225 W TDP, a 550 W suggested PSU, and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, positioning it for desktop systems with dedicated power delivery. The LX MAX offers 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the 880M uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. For workloads that require large local memory pools, the LX MAX’s dedicated 12 GB frame buffer is a structural advantage, though no benchmark data confirms its realized performance.

The 880M wins on efficiency metrics from its specification sheet, with a 15 W TDP compared to the LX MAX’s 225 W. The 880M also uses a 4 nm process node versus the LX MAX’s 6 nm node. The 880M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. The 880M has no power connectors, while the LX MAX requires one 16-pin connector. These are specification-level wins, not performance wins, since the LX MAX lacks measured results.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon 880M is built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, part of the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point mobile chips. It uses a 4 nm process at TSMC with 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 145.9M per mm². The LX MAX uses the TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, so no density figure can be calculated.

The 880M features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, 16 raster output pipelines, and 12 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX features 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output pipelines, with no ray tracing cores listed. The LX MAX’s shading unit count is exactly eight times the 880M’s, and its TMU count is four times higher. The ROP count is six times higher on the LX MAX. The 880M lists no tensor cores, and the LX MAX also lists no tensor cores.

Clock behavior differs substantially. The 880M has a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. The LX MAX has no base or boost clock listed in the database. Memory clocks are also distinct: the 880M uses system shared memory, while the LX MAX runs GDDR6 at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The 880M’s memory bandwidth is system dependent, whereas the LX MAX has a fixed 432.0 GB/s.

The pixel rate for the 880M is 46.40 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 139.2 GTexel/s. The LX MAX’s pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s. The LX MAX’s pixel rate is 4.14 times the 880M’s, and its texture rate is 2.76 times higher. Floating point throughput shows the largest gap: the 880M delivers 4.454 TFLOPS FP32 and 4.454 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. The LX MAX’s FP32 figure is 5.52 times the 880M’s, and its FP16 figure is 11.04 times higher.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The 880M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. The 880M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The LX MAX’s interface provides double the lane count of the 880M.

Specification Differences

The two devices differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The 880M is manufactured by AMD with the Strix Point chip, while the LX MAX has an unknown manufacturer and uses the 7G106 chip. The 880M belongs to the RDNA 3.5 architecture and Navi III IGP generation; the LX MAX belongs to the TrueGPU architecture and 7G100 generation.

Process node: the 880M uses 4 nm, the LX MAX uses 6 nm, both at TSMC. Transistors: the 880M has 34,000 million, the LX MAX is unknown. Die size: the 880M is 233 mm², the LX MAX is unknown. Transistor density: 145.9M per mm² for the 880M, null for the LX MAX.

Clocks: the 880M has a 400 MHz base and 2900 MHz boost, while the LX MAX has no base or boost clock recorded. Memory: the 880M uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, while the LX MAX has 12 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 2250 MHz memory clock.

Compute units: the 880M has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 12 RT cores. The LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and no RT cores. Pixel rate: 46.40 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 139.2 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32: 4.454 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16: 4.454 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS.

Power: the 880M has a 15 W TDP, no power connectors, and an IGP slot width. The LX MAX has a 225 W TDP, one 16-pin power connector, a 550 W suggested PSU, and a dual-slot form factor. Dimensions: the 880M has none listed, while the LX MAX measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

Bus interface: PCIe 4.0 x8 for the 880M, PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX MAX. Display outputs: portable device dependent for the 880M, four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs for the LX MAX. Vulkan support: 1.4 for the 880M, 1.3 for the LX MAX. Release dates: the 880M released on 2024-07-14, the LX MAX on 2026-03-16. The 880M’s predecessor is Navi II IGP; the LX MAX has no predecessor listed. The 880M’s production status is Active, and the LX MAX’s production status is also Active.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is 5.52 times the AMD Radeon 880M’s 4.454 TFLOPS.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How do their power requirements differ?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M has a 15 W TDP and no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a 225 W TDP, requires one 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Do both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both the AMD Radeon 880M and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. They differ in Vulkan support, with the 880M at version 1.4 and the LX MAX at version 1.3.

Q: What benchmark data exists for the Lisuan Tech LX MAX?

A: The database contains no benchmark scores for the LX MAX. Its average benchmark score is recorded as zero, and it has no individual test entries. The AMD Radeon 880M has ten recorded benchmark scores with an average of 8436.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 880M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 880M’s average score of 8436 is 0.1% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX’s 8427, 0.3% below the NVIDIA GeForce MX330’s 8458, 0.3% below the AMD Radeon HD 8870M’s 8462, and 1.3% above the AMD Radeon R9 M375X’s 8325.