AMD Radeon 880M vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data does not include any direct head-to-head benchmark runs between the AMD Radeon 880M and the Intel Arc Pro B370. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither part has a recorded win count against the other in the database. This means any comparative performance assessment must rely on the individual benchmark scores and architectural parameters that are present in the database.

For the AMD Radeon 880M, the database contains a full set of benchmark results. Its average benchmark score is 8436, placing it at the 43rd percentile among all GPUs tracked. The strongest results come from Geekbench Vulkan at 40006 points and Geekbench OpenCL at 31285 points. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 535 points. Passmark results are more modest: G3D at 7615, GPU Compute at 3719, G2D at 969, DirectX 9 at 97, DirectX 11 at 73, DirectX 12 at 32, and DirectX 10 at 31. These benchmarks reveal a part that performs best in modern API workloads and compute-oriented tests, while legacy DirectX performance trails significantly.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, its percentile is 50, and the nearest rivals array is empty. Consequently, there is no empirical measurement in the database to compare its actual rendering performance against the Radeon 880M. The only quantitative performance indicators available are theoretical specifications: the Arc Pro B370 delivers a peak FP32 throughput of 6.144 TFLOPS, a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. By comparison, the Radeon 880M outputs 4.454 TFLOPS FP32, 46.40 GPixel/s, and 139.2 GTexel/s. On paper, the Intel part holds a 38% advantage in FP32 throughput and a 3.4% advantage in pixel rate, while the AMD part leads in texture rate by 45%.

The database does show nearest rivals for the Radeon 880M, which provides context for its measured standing. The Radeon 880M sits within 0.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and the AMD Radeon HD 8870M, and it is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX. It also runs 1.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 M375X. These deltas are small, indicating the Radeon 880M occupies a tightly clustered performance band among these older discrete mobile GPUs. Without any benchmark entries for the Arc Pro B370, no such comparison can be constructed for the Intel part from database measurements.

Architecture Differences

The two integrated graphics processors come from fundamentally different architectural generations and process technologies. The AMD Radeon 880M uses the Strix Point chip built on RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip built on Xe3-LPG architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel. These process nodes represent distinct manufacturing approaches, with the Intel part using a newer, smaller node geometry.

The Radeon 880M integrates 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 145.9 million transistors per square millimeter. The Arc Pro B370 has unknown transistor count and die size in the database, so no density figure can be stated. The Radeon 880M belongs to the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point Mobile, while the Arc Pro B370 belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM generation for Panther Lake. The Radeon 880M's predecessor is Navi II IGP, and the Arc Pro B370's predecessor is HD Graphics-WM. Both parts are listed as Active in production status.

Shader configuration differs substantially. The Radeon 880M uses 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units, with 12 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B370 uses 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster output units, with 10 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 66.7% more shading units and 25% more ROPs, but the AMD part has 20% more TMUs and 20% more ray tracing cores. Neither part lists tensor cores in the database.

Clock behavior also diverges. The Radeon 880M has a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. The Arc Pro B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The Radeon 880M therefore runs 33.3% higher at base and 20.8% higher at boost. Memory for both is System Shared in size, type, and bus width, with bandwidth listed as System Dependent. Both parts use the IGP slot width and have no power connectors.

The API support is identical: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface differs, with the Radeon 880M using PCIe 4.0 x8 and the Arc Pro B370 using IGP. Display outputs for both are Portable Device Dependent.

The Verdict

The database provides a clear measurement for the AMD Radeon 880M and no measurements for the Intel Arc Pro B370. Any decision between these two parts must therefore rest on the recorded data alone. The Radeon 880M has a verified average benchmark score of 8436, placing it at the 43rd percentile. The Arc Pro B370 has no recorded score, and its percentile of 50 appears without supporting benchmark data, making it non-comparable on an empirical basis.

From a purely theoretical standpoint, the Arc Pro B370 offers higher peak FP32 throughput at 6.144 TFLOPS versus 4.454 TFLOPS, and a slightly higher pixel rate at 48.00 GPixel/s versus 46.40 GPixel/s. These figures suggest the Intel part could deliver stronger raw compute throughput in workloads that scale with shader count, given its 1280 shading units versus 768. However, the Radeon 880M counters with a higher texture rate of 139.2 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s, driven by its 48 TMUs and higher boost clock of 2900 MHz versus 2400 MHz.

The power envelope differs as well, with the Radeon 880M rated at 15 W TDP and the Arc Pro B370 rated at 25 W TDP. The Radeon 880M achieves its measured performance at a lower power limit, which is relevant for integrated parts in portable devices. The Arc Pro B370 has a larger shader array and higher FP32 ceiling, but it also draws more power and has no recorded benchmark output to validate its real-world standing.

For users relying on database measurements, the Radeon 880M is the only part with verified scores across multiple benchmark suites. The Arc Pro B370 remains unmeasured, so the data cannot confirm its performance claims. The Radeon 880M's nearest rivals, all within 1.3% of its average score, show it competes with a specific set of older discrete mobile GPUs. The Arc Pro B370 has no such context in the database. Given the absence of benchmark data for the Intel part, the recorded evidence favors the AMD Radeon 880M as the empirically supported option.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ across several recorded specification fields.

• Architecture: AMD Radeon 880M uses RDNA 3.5; Intel Arc Pro B370 uses Xe3-LPG
• Process node: AMD Radeon 880M uses 4 nm; Intel Arc Pro B370 uses 3 nm
• Transistors: AMD Radeon 880M has 34,000 million; Intel Arc Pro B370 is unknown
• Die size: AMD Radeon 880M is 233 mm²; Intel Arc Pro B370 is unknown
• Base clock: AMD Radeon 880M is 400 MHz; Intel Arc Pro B370 is 300 MHz
• Boost clock: AMD Radeon 880M is 2900 MHz; Intel Arc Pro B370 is 2400 MHz
• Shading units: AMD Radeon 880M has 768; Intel Arc Pro B370 has 1280
• TMUs: AMD Radeon 880M has 48; Intel Arc Pro B370 has 40
• ROPs: AMD Radeon 880M has 16; Intel Arc Pro B370 has 20
• Ray tracing cores: AMD Radeon 880M has 12; Intel Arc Pro B370 has 10
• Pixel rate: AMD Radeon 880M is 46.40 GPixel/s; Intel Arc Pro B370 is 48.00 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: AMD Radeon 880M is 139.2 GTexel/s; Intel Arc Pro B370 is 96.00 GTexel/s
• FP32 throughput: AMD Radeon 880M is 4.454 TFLOPS; Intel Arc Pro B370 is 6.144 TFLOPS
• FP16 throughput: AMD Radeon 880M is 4.454 TFLOPS (1:1); Intel Arc Pro B370 is 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: AMD Radeon 880M is 15 W; Intel Arc Pro B370 is 25 W
• Bus interface: AMD Radeon 880M uses PCIe 4.0 x8; Intel Arc Pro B370 uses IGP
• Release date: AMD Radeon 880M is 2024-07-14; Intel Arc Pro B370 is 2026-01-26

Fields that are identical include memory configuration (System Shared for both), slot width (IGP for both), power connectors (None for both), display outputs (Portable Device Dependent for both), and API support (DirectX 12 Ultimate 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4 for both). Neither part has a recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M has an average benchmark score of 8436. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores, with an average benchmark score listed as 0.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 880M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Radeon 880M is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX, 0.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX330, 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon HD 8870M, and 1.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 M375X.

Q: What are the FP32 throughput figures for both GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M delivers 4.454 TFLOPS FP32. The Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, which is 38% higher.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, while the AMD Radeon 880M has 768 shading units.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two parts?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M is rated at 15 W TDP, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 is rated at 25 W TDP.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same API versions?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.