AMD Radeon 860M vs Intel Arc 140V Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clear disparity in benchmark coverage between these two integrated graphics processors. The AMD Radeon 860M has two recorded benchmark scores, while the Intel Arc 140V Mobile has no benchmark entries in the database. This absence of comparative data means a direct side-by-side score comparison cannot be constructed from measurements.

The AMD Radeon 860M delivers a geekbench_opencl score of 22759 and a geekbench_vulkan score of 30043. The average benchmark score for the AMD part is 26401. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile, however, has an average benchmark score of 0, which reflects the lack of recorded measurements rather than an actual performance level.

The percentile data reinforces the split. The AMD Radeon 860M sits at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, placing it above the median. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile sits at the 50th percentile, a position that is consistent with the absence of benchmark data pulling its standing to the midpoint.

The nearest rivals for the AMD Radeon 860M provide context for its average score. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 averages 26421, which is a 0.1% difference from the AMD part. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 averages 26331, putting the AMD part 0.3% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary averages 26553, a 0.6% gap. The NVIDIA RTX A4000 averages 26683, leaving the AMD part 1.1% behind. These deltas show the Radeon 860M clustering tightly with a range of discrete and professional GPUs, all within roughly one percent of its average score.

No head-to-head benchmark entries exist for the pair, so the measured wins for each part stand at zero. The analysis must rely on architectural specifications and the partial benchmark record to characterize expected behavior.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers and use different underlying designs. The AMD Radeon 860M uses the RDNA 3.5 architecture on the Krackan Point chip, belonging to the Navi III IGP generation (Strix Point Mobile). The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses the Xe2-LPG architecture on the Lunar Lake chip, belonging to the Arc Graphics-M generation (Lunar Lake).

The manufacturing process differs. The AMD part is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel part is built on a 3 nm process, also at TSMC. The die size for the Intel chip is recorded at 172 mm², while the AMD die size is unknown in the database.

Shader resources differ substantially. The AMD Radeon 860M has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation pipelines. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile doubles those counts: 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation pipelines. Both parts have 8 ray tracing cores, but the AMD implementation uses RDNA 3.5 ray tracing hardware while the Intel implementation uses Xe2-LPG ray tracing hardware. Neither part lists tensor cores.

Clock behavior diverges. The AMD Radeon 860M has a 600 MHz base clock and a 3000 MHz boost clock. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a 300 MHz base clock and a 1950 MHz boost clock. The AMD part boosts considerably higher, which partially offsets the Intel part's larger shader count.

Theoretical throughput numbers reflect the architectural balance. The AMD Radeon 860M reaches 3.072 TFLOPS for FP32 and 3.072 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile reaches 3.994 TFLOPS for FP32 and 7.987 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The Intel part leads in both raw FP32 and FP16 throughput, and its FP16 advantage is particularly pronounced due to the 2:1 ratio.

Rasterization rates follow the resource counts. The AMD Radeon 860M achieves 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile achieves 62.40 GPixel/s and 124.8 GTexel/s. The Intel part leads in both fill rates.

Power configuration separates the two clearly. The AMD Radeon 860M carries a 15 W TDP and uses no power connectors. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile carries a 37 W TDP. Both are integrated graphics processors with system-shared memory. The AMD part uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the Intel part's bus interface is recorded simply as IGP. Display outputs for both are portable device dependent.

API support is identical on paper. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Release timing differs. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile was released on 2024-09-23. The AMD Radeon 860M followed on 2025-02-28. The AMD part lists its predecessor as Navi II IGP, while the Intel part lists its predecessor as HD Graphics-M. Both are currently marked as Active in production status.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher FP32 throughput?

A: The Intel Arc 140V Mobile records 3.994 TFLOPS for FP32, compared to 3.072 TFLOPS for the AMD Radeon 860M.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 860M have any benchmark advantage over the Intel Arc 140V Mobile?

A: The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries and no benchmark scores for the Intel Arc 140V Mobile. The AMD Radeon 860M has recorded scores of 22759 in geekbench_opencl and 30043 in geekbench_vulkan.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 860M compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: Its average score of 26401 is within 0.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, and 1.1% behind the NVIDIA RTX A4000.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M has a 15 W TDP, while the Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a 37 W TDP.

Q: Which part has more shading units?

A: The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has 1024 shading units, double the 512 shading units found in the AMD Radeon 860M.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ across nearly every recorded specification. The manufacturing node changes from 4 nm for AMD to 3 nm for Intel. Die size is unknown for AMD and 172 mm² for Intel.

Shader resources change from 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs on the AMD part to 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs on the Intel part. Both share 8 ray tracing cores.

Clock speeds differ. The AMD Radeon 860M runs at 600 MHz base and 3000 MHz boost. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile runs at 300 MHz base and 1950 MHz boost.

Throughput rates differ. The AMD part records 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 3.072 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. The Intel part records 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 and 7.987 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s for AMD and 62.40 GPixel/s for Intel. Texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s for AMD and 124.8 GTexel/s for Intel.

TDP differs significantly. The AMD part is rated at 15 W, the Intel part at 37 W. Power connectors are listed as none for the AMD part and not specified for the Intel part. Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 for AMD and IGP for Intel.

Release dates differ. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile launched on 2024-09-23. The AMD Radeon 860M launched on 2025-02-28.

Benchmark records differ. The AMD part has two benchmark scores and a 72nd percentile ranking. The Intel part has no benchmark scores and a 50th percentile ranking.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates that the AMD Radeon 860M is the better-documented part, with benchmark scores placing it at the 72nd percentile and within one percent of several discrete GPUs. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has no benchmark measurements in the database, so its actual performance cannot be verified from the available records.

The AMD Radeon 860M delivers a geekbench_vulkan score of 30043 and a geekbench_opencl score of 22759. Its average score of 26401 sits near the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, both within fractions of a percent. This positions the AMD part as a known quantity in the database.

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile offers higher theoretical specifications: double the shading units, double the TMUs, double the ROPs, higher FP32 throughput, and higher pixel and texture rates. It also carries a higher 37 W TDP, which is more than double the AMD part's 15 W rating. The Intel part's FP16 throughput of 7.987 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio is the largest single specification advantage.

The AMD Radeon 860M counters with a much higher boost clock of 3000 MHz versus 1950 MHz, and it uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. Its lower 15 W TDP suggests a more power-constrained design profile.

For users relying on database-verified performance, the AMD Radeon 860M is the only part with measured results. For users prioritizing raw specification counts, the Intel Arc 140V Mobile has the numerical edge in shader resources and throughput. The absence of Intel benchmark data prevents a measured verdict on its real-world standing.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 860M wins in the benchmark record. It has two recorded scores, an average of 26401, and a 72nd percentile placement. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has no recorded scores and a 50th percentile placement. Any comparison of measured performance favors the AMD part by default, since the Intel part has no data.

The AMD Radeon 860M also wins on clock speed. Its 3000 MHz boost clock is substantially higher than the Intel part's 1950 MHz boost. Its 600 MHz base clock is double the Intel part's 300 MHz base clock.

The AMD Radeon 860M wins on power efficiency. Its 15 W TDP is well below the Intel part's 37 W TDP. Lower power draw can be relevant in thermally constrained portable devices, though the database does not include battery life or thermal measurements.

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile wins on shader resources. Its 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs all double the AMD part's counts. The Intel part's 8 ray tracing cores match the AMD part's 8 ray tracing cores.

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile wins on throughput. Its 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 exceeds the AMD part's 3.072 TFLOPS. Its 7.987 TFLOPS FP16 more than doubles the AMD part's 3.072 TFLOPS. Its 62.40 GPixel/s pixel rate and 124.8 GTexel/s texture rate both exceed the AMD part's 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s.

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile wins on process node and die size information. It uses a 3 nm process versus 4 nm for AMD, and its 172 mm² die size is recorded while the AMD die size is unknown.

The two parts tie on API support, with both listing DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both use system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. Both are integrated graphics processors with portable device dependent display outputs.

The AMD part has the more recent release date of 2025-02-28, while the Intel part shipped earlier on 2024-09-23. Both parts list a predecessor, with AMD succeeding Navi II IGP and Intel succeeding HD Graphics-M. Neither part has a successor recorded in the database.