AMD Radeon 8065S vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon 8065S and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. Both entries have empty benchmark arrays, zero average benchmark scores, and identical percentile rankings at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. Consequently, there are no measured wins for either part in this comparison. The absence of benchmark data means any performance conclusions must be derived from the architectural specifications, clock rates, and memory characteristics documented in the database rather than from empirical test results. Both products sit at the same percentile position, indicating no recorded data separates them in aggregate performance ranking. The wins tally is zero for both sides, and no nearest rival information exists to contextualize either GPU against other products. This comparison therefore rests entirely on the static specification fields, which reveal substantial differences in compute throughput, memory configuration, and power envelope.

Where Each One Wins

Without benchmark measurements, the advantage splits must be inferred from the recorded specifications. The AMD Radeon 8065S shows strengths in raw clock speed, with a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded base or boost clock values. The AMD part also leads in texture throughput, delivering 480.0 GTexel/s against the LX MAX's 384.0 GTexel/s, a 25 percent advantage in that specific metric. Both GPUs match at 192.0 GPixel/s pixel fill rate, meaning rasterization output is identical on paper. The AMD Radeon 8065S uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses a 6 nm node from the same foundry, giving the AMD part a density advantage per square millimeter. The AMD GPU integrates as an IGP with PCIe 5.0 x16 connectivity, whereas the LX MAX is a dual-slot discrete card with PCIe 4.0 x16. The AMD part draws 55 W, making it suitable for integrated deployments, while the LX MAX consumes 225 W and requires a 16-pin power connector plus a 550 W suggested power supply. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins decisively in compute-heavy workloads: its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS exceeds the AMD Radeon 8065S's 15.36 TFLOPS by roughly 60 percent. The LX MAX also provides FP16 performance of 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 rate, while the AMD part delivers 15.36 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, a 3.2 times advantage for the Lisuan part. Memory capacity and bandwidth strongly favor the LX MAX: 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, compared to the AMD part's system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The LX MAX also has more shading units (6144 versus 2560), more TMUs (192 versus 160), and more ROPs (96 versus 64). The AMD Radeon 8065S includes 40 ray tracing cores, while the LX MAX records no ray tracing core count. The AMD part supports Vulkan 1.4, whereas the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. The LX MAX offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the AMD part's display outputs are portable device dependent.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon 8065S uses the Gorgon Halo chip built on RDNA 3.5 architecture, belonging to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip built on TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation. Process nodes differ: the AMD part is fabricated on a 4 nm TSMC process, while the LX MAX uses a 6 nm TSMC process. Die size is recorded for the AMD part at 308 mm², while the LX MAX die size is unknown. Transistor counts are unknown for both parts. The AMD Radeon 8065S has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 40 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. Memory architecture differs fundamentally: the AMD part uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, while the LX MAX uses 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD part's memory clock is listed as system shared, whereas the LX MAX's memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate. Power delivery differs significantly: the AMD part is an IGP with no power connectors and a 55 W TDP, while the LX MAX is a dual-slot card requiring one 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested power supply, drawing 225 W. The AMD part uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs: the AMD part is portable device dependent, while the LX MAX has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. API support shows the AMD part with Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX has Vulkan 1.3; both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. Physical dimensions are recorded only for the LX MAX: 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width. The AMD Radeon 8065S has no dimensions listed. Release dates differ: the AMD part is dated 2025-12-31, while the LX MAX is dated 2026-03-16. The AMD part lists Polaris Mobile as its predecessor, while the LX MAX has no predecessor recorded. Both parts are marked as Active production status.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), while the AMD Radeon 8065S delivers 15.36 TFLOPS FP32 and 15.36 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1). The LX MAX leads by about 60 percent in FP32 and by roughly 3.2 times in FP16.

Q: How do memory configurations compare?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: Which part has higher clock speeds?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S has a recorded base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no base or boost clock values recorded in the database.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S is an IGP with a 55 W TDP and no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a 225 W TDP, requires one 16-pin power connector, and has a 550 W suggested power supply.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The AMD Radeon 8065S supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: Which GPU has more texture and pixel processing units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 192 TMUs and 96 ROPs, while the AMD Radeon 8065S has 160 TMUs and 64 ROPs. However, both parts achieve the same 192.0 GPixel/s pixel fill rate, while the AMD part achieves 480.0 GTexel/s texture rate versus 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX MAX.

The Verdict

The data indicates two GPUs aimed at different deployment scenarios. The AMD Radeon 8065S, with its 55 W TDP, integrated form factor, and PCIe 5.0 interface, suits compact or power-constrained systems where the host memory is shared. Its higher boost clock of 3000 MHz and texture rate of 480.0 GTexel/s suggest strong responsiveness for texture-heavy workloads. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX, with 225 W TDP, dual-slot design, 16-pin power connector, and 12 GB dedicated GDDR6 memory, targets scenarios requiring sustained compute throughput and dedicated memory bandwidth. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 output position it ahead in numerical workloads, while its 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 192-bit bus provide memory capacity that the system-shared AMD part cannot match. The AMD part counters with a 4 nm process node versus the LX MAX's 6 nm node, a smaller die at 308 mm², and support for Vulkan 1.4. The AMD Radeon 8065S also includes 40 ray tracing cores, a feature absent from the LX MAX specification. Users needing integrated graphics with high boost clocks and ray tracing capability would select the AMD part. Users needing dedicated memory, high FP32 and FP16 throughput, and a discrete card form factor would select the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. The identical pixel fill rate of 192.0 GPixel/s means rasterization output parity, but the LX MAX's larger shading unit count (6144 versus 2560) and higher FP32 output indicate greater compute headroom. The AMD part's smaller process node and lower power draw favor efficiency, while the LX MAX's higher TDP reflects its larger memory subsystem and compute resources. Both parts hold the same 50th percentile ranking in the database, with no benchmark scores to differentiate them empirically.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Radeon 8065S | Lisuan Tech LX MAX |

|-------|------------------|--------------------|

| Chip | Gorgon Halo | 7G106 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |

| Die Size | 308 mm² | Unknown |

| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | None recorded |

| Boost Clock | 3000 MHz | None recorded |

| Memory Clock | System Shared | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 160 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | None recorded |

| Pixel Rate | 192.0 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 480.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 15.36 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 15.36 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None recorded | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | None recorded | 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm |

| Release Date | 2025-12-31 | 2026-03-16 |

| Predecessor | Polaris Mobile | None recorded |