AMD Radeon 8065S vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER Comparison

The Verdict

The database comparison between the AMD Radeon 8065S and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is defined by two entirely different design targets. The Radeon 8065S is a 55 W integrated graphics processor built on a 4 nm node, occupying a 308 mm² die with 2,560 shading units. The RTX 5080 SUPER is a 415 W dual-slot discrete card with a 378 mm² die, 10,752 shading units, and 24 GB of GDDR7 memory.

The recorded benchmark data shows the RTX 5080 SUPER delivering a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,075. This places it in the 19th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 at 3,163 (2.8% ahead), the Intel Arc Pro B60 at 3,182 (3.4% ahead), and the NVIDIA GeForce 820A at 2,983 (3.1% behind). The Radeon 8065S has no recorded benchmark scores and no rival data in the database.

The RTX 5080 SUPER is the only one of the two with measurable performance data. It sits slightly below the Quadro P1000 and Arc Pro B60 in the Steel Nomad test, but it is marginally faster than the GeForce 820A and GTX 860M. The Radeon 8065S cannot be placed on the same performance scale because the database contains zero benchmark entries for it. Any direct performance comparison between these two is therefore impossible from recorded data.

The practical verdict is straightforward. The RTX 5080 SUPER is a high-power, high-throughput discrete GPU with a 1.02 TB/s memory bus and 336 tensor cores, aimed at workloads that can use its FP32 throughput of 56.28 TFLOPS. The Radeon 8065S is a low-power integrated solution with system-shared memory and no dedicated VRAM, suited for portable devices where power draw is a constraint. Choose the RTX 5080 SUPER for raw compute and rendering tasks that demand a dedicated card. Choose the Radeon 8065S for a compact, integrated setup where the 55 W power envelope is the priority.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers and different architectural generations. The AMD Radeon 8065S uses the Gorgon Halo chip with RDNA 3.5 architecture, part of the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The die size is 308 mm², and the transistor count is not listed in the database.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER uses the GB203 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50-series. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The transistor density is recorded as 120.6 million per mm².

Clock behavior differs substantially. The Radeon 8065S has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz. The AMD part boosts higher, but the NVIDIA part has a much higher base clock.

Memory architecture is fundamentally different. The Radeon 8065S uses system-shared memory, meaning its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all dependent on the host system. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth. The AMD card has no dedicated memory controller configuration of its own.

Compute resources differ by a wide margin. The Radeon 8065S has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 40 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10,752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 84 RT cores, and 336 tensor cores. The NVIDIA card has roughly 4.2 times the shading units and 5.25 times the TMUs.

Feature support is similar at the API level. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 5080 SUPER adds tensor cores, which the Radeon 8065S does not have listed. Both use a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database lists no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two GPUs. There are no direct comparison scores, no win counts, and no delta percentages between the Radeon 8065S and the RTX 5080 SUPER. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero.

The only benchmark recorded for either product is the RTX 5080 SUPER's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,075. The Radeon 8065S has an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of zero, and no rivals listed. The percentile rank for the Radeon 8065S is 50, which is a neutral midpoint in the database distribution, but with no actual scores behind it.

The RTX 5080 SUPER's nearest rivals in the database show a tight cluster. The Quadro P1000 scores 3,163, which is 2.8% higher than the 5080 SUPER. The Arc Pro B60 scores 3,182, 3.4% higher. On the other side, the GeForce 820A scores 2,983, which is 3.1% lower, and the GTX 860M scores 2,967, which is 3.6% lower. The RTX 5080 SUPER sits between these two groups, slightly below the top two rivals and slightly above the bottom two.

The 19th percentile ranking indicates that 81% of all GPUs in the database score higher than the RTX 5080 SUPER in this particular test. This is a low percentile, but the nearest rivals are all within a few percentage points, suggesting a dense cluster of similar-performing cards in this score range.

Without any benchmark data for the Radeon 8065S, no comparison of wins or losses can be made. The RTX 5080 SUPER is the only product with measurable results in this pairing.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 8065S have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists an empty benchmark array for the Radeon 8065S, with an average benchmark score of zero and no nearest rivals. The RTX 5080 SUPER has one recorded score of 3,075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The Radeon 8065S uses system-shared memory, so its size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all system dependent. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The Radeon 8065S is rated at 55 W and is an integrated graphics processor with no power connectors. The RTX 5080 SUPER is rated at 415 W and requires a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10,752 shading units. The Radeon 8065S has 2,560 shading units. The NVIDIA card also has 336 tensor cores, while the AMD card has no tensor cores listed.

Q: Are there any direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two?

A: No. The database contains zero head-to-head benchmark entries for this pairing. The win counts are zero for both sides. Only the RTX 5080 SUPER has standalone benchmark data.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The Radeon 8065S is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The RTX 5080 SUPER uses a 5 nm process at the same foundry. The NVIDIA chip has 45,600 million transistors, while the AMD transistor count is unknown.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5080 SUPER wins in every category where recorded data exists. It has a dedicated 24 GB GDDR7 memory pool with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, which is a clear advantage over the system-shared memory of the Radeon 8065S. The 10,752 shading units and 336 TMUs provide a much larger compute throughput, reflected in its 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 rating versus 15.36 TFLOPS for the Radeon 8065S.

The RTX 5080 SUPER also wins on pixel and texture rates. It delivers 293.1 GPixel/s and 879.3 GTexel/s, compared to 192.0 GPixel/s and 480.0 GTexel/s for the Radeon 8065S. The NVIDIA card has 84 ray tracing cores and 336 tensor cores, while the AMD card has 40 RT cores and no tensor cores. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a higher base clock (2295 MHz vs 1295 MHz), although the AMD part boosts higher (3000 MHz vs 2617 MHz).

The Radeon 8065S wins on power efficiency and form factor. It draws 55 W compared to 415 W for the RTX 5080 SUPER. The AMD card is an integrated graphics processor with no slot width, no power connectors, and no separate dimensions. It is designed to be part of a portable device. The RTX 5080 SUPER is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, requiring a 16-pin power connector.

The Radeon 8065S also wins on clock ceiling, with a 3000 MHz boost clock versus 2617 MHz for the NVIDIA card. However, this advantage is paired with far fewer compute units. The AMD card uses a smaller die (308 mm² vs 378 mm²) and a denser process node (4 nm vs 5 nm).

For use cases, the RTX 5080 SUPER is the choice for any workload that needs dedicated VRAM, high texture throughput, or tensor core acceleration. The 1.02 TB/s bandwidth and 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 make it suited for rendering, compute, and AI-adjacent tasks. The Radeon 8065S is suited for compact systems where the 55 W power draw and integrated form factor are the defining constraints, and where system-shared memory is acceptable.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two GPUs in the database:

• Chip: Gorgon Halo (AMD) vs GB203 (NVIDIA)
• Architecture: RDNA 3.5 vs Blackwell 2.0
• Generation: Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) vs GeForce 50
• Process Node: 4 nm vs 5 nm
• Transistors: Unknown vs 45,600 million
• Die Size: 308 mm² vs 378 mm²
• Transistor Density: Not listed vs 120.6M / mm²
• Base Clock: 1295 MHz vs 2295 MHz
• Boost Clock: 3000 MHz vs 2617 MHz
• Memory Clock: System Shared vs 2000 MHz, 32 Gbps effective
• Memory Size: System Shared vs 24 GB
• Memory Type: System Shared vs GDDR7
• Memory Bus Width: System Shared vs 256 bit
• Memory Bandwidth: System Dependent vs 1.02 TB/s
• Shading Units: 2560 vs 10752
• TMUs: 160 vs 336
• ROPs: 64 vs 112
• RT Cores: 40 vs 84
• Tensor Cores: Not listed vs 336
• Pixel Rate: 192.0 GPixel/s vs 293.1 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: 480.0 GTexel/s vs 879.3 GTexel/s
• FP32 Performance: 15.36 TFLOPS vs 56.28 TFLOPS
• FP16 Performance: 15.36 TFLOPS (1:1) vs 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1)
• TDP: 55 W vs 415 W
• Slot Width: IGP vs Dual-slot
• Power Connectors: None vs 1x 16-pin
• Display Outputs: Portable Device Dependent vs 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
• Dimensions: Not listed vs 304 mm length, 137 mm height, 40 mm width
• Launch MSRP: Not listed vs 999 USD
• Benchmark Scores: None vs 3,075 (3DMark Steel Nomad DX12)
• Percentile vs All GPUs: 50 vs 19

Both cards share the same PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 support. Both are listed as Active production status with the same release date of December 31, 2025.