AMD Radeon 8065S vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core specifications of the AMD Radeon 8065S and the Intel Arc Pro B370?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S uses the Gorgon Halo chip with RDNA 3.5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, featuring 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 40 RT cores. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture on a 3 nm Intel process, featuring 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores.

Q: How do the clock speeds compare between the two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The AMD part runs at a significantly higher base frequency.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) difference?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S has a TDP of 55 W, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W. The Intel part consumes less than half the power budget of the AMD part.

Q: Which GPU has higher compute throughput in FP32 operations?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S delivers 15.36 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is exactly 2.5 times the 6.144 TFLOPS of the Intel Arc Pro B370.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same API feature levels?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores available for these GPUs?

A: The database records no benchmark entries for either GPU. Both have an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50 against all GPUs, with no nearest rivals specified.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon 8065S and Intel Arc Pro B370 represent fundamentally different design approaches within the integrated GPU segment. The AMD part uses the Gorgon Halo chip built on RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm TSMC process. The Intel part uses the Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm Intel process. The AMD chip has a die size of 308 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded in the database.

The compute resource allocation differs substantially. The AMD Radeon 8065S carries 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The Intel Arc Pro B370 carries exactly half the shading units at 1280, along with 40 TMUs and 20 ROPs. Ray tracing hardware follows the same ratio: the AMD part has 40 RT cores versus 10 on the Intel part.

Clock behavior diverges sharply. The AMD Radeon 8065S operates with a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The AMD boost clock exceeds the Intel boost clock by 600 MHz, and the AMD base clock is more than four times the Intel base clock.

Memory architecture is identical in concept: both use system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, and neither has dedicated VRAM. Both are integrated graphics processors with an IGP slot width and no power connectors. The bus interface differs, with the AMD part using PCIe 5.0 x16 while the Intel part is listed simply as IGP.

FP16 throughput reveals a different compute balance. The AMD Radeon 8065S achieves 15.36 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 1:1 ratio to FP32. The Intel Arc Pro B370 achieves 12.29 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, indicating that the Intel architecture processes FP16 at twice the rate of FP32.

Production status for both parts is Active. The AMD Radeon 8065S has a release date of 2025-12-31 and lists Polaris Mobile as its predecessor. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a release date of 2026-01-26 and lists HD Graphics-WM as its predecessor. Neither part has a successor recorded.

The Verdict

The recorded data positions the AMD Radeon 8065S as the higher-performance part across every compute metric. FP32 throughput of 15.36 TFLOPS is 2.5 times the Intel Arc Pro B370's 6.144 TFLOPS. Pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is exactly four times the Intel part's 48.00 GPixel/s. Texture rate of 480.0 GTexel/s is exactly five times the Intel part's 96.00 GTexel/s. The AMD part also doubles the Intel part in shading units, TMUs, ROPs, and RT cores.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 counters with power efficiency. At 25 W TDP, it draws less than half the 55 W TDP of the AMD part while still delivering 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The Intel part also uses a more advanced 3 nm Intel process node compared to the 4 nm TSMC node of the AMD part.

The release timeline slightly favors the AMD part, with a 2025-12-31 date versus 2026-01-26 for Intel. Both parts are active production items with no benchmark scores, no average scores above zero, and no nearest rivals in the database.

Users who prioritize maximum integrated graphics throughput should select the AMD Radeon 8065S based on its 2.5x FP32 advantage, 4x pixel rate advantage, and 5x texture rate advantage. Users who prioritize lower power draw should select the Intel Arc Pro B370 based on its 25 W TDP. The database contains no performance measurements to validate real-world behavior, so these selections rest entirely on specification data.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 8065S | Intel Arc Pro B370 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Gorgon Halo | Panther Lake |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Xe3-LPG |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 308 mm² | unknown |

| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 3000 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 1280 |

| TMUs | 160 | 40 |

| ROPs | 64 | 20 |

| RT Cores | 40 | 10 |

| Pixel Rate | 192.0 GPixel/s | 48.00 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 480.0 GTexel/s | 96.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 15.36 TFLOPS | 6.144 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 15.36 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 25 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | IGP |

| Release Date | 2025-12-31 | 2026-01-26 |

| Predecessor | Polaris Mobile | HD Graphics-WM |

Both parts share identical API support (DirectX 12 Ultimate 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4), identical memory architecture (system shared with system dependent bandwidth), identical slot width (IGP), identical power connector configuration (none), and identical display output configuration (portable device dependent). Neither part has a launch MSRP recorded.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Radeon 8065S versus the Intel Arc Pro B370. Neither GPU has individual benchmark scores, average benchmark scores above zero, or nearest rival comparisons. The win counts for both parts stand at zero.

The absence of measured performance data means the specification sheet provides the only quantitative comparison. The AMD Radeon 8065S leads in every throughput metric. FP32 compute of 15.36 TFLOPS gives it a 150% advantage over the Intel part's 6.144 TFLOPS. Pixel throughput of 192.0 GPixel/s represents a 300% advantage over 48.00 GPixel/s. Texture throughput of 480.0 GTexel/s represents a 400% advantage over 96.00 GTexel/s.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 shows a narrower gap in FP16 compute. Its 12.29 TFLOPS trails the AMD part's 15.36 TFLOPS by roughly 25%, a much smaller deficit than the FP32 gap. This reflects the Intel architecture's 2:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, which effectively doubles its FP16 throughput relative to its FP32 capability.

Clock speed differences reinforce the AMD advantage. The 3000 MHz boost clock of the AMD part exceeds the 2400 MHz boost clock of the Intel part by 25%. The base clock gap is far larger: 1295 MHz versus 300 MHz, a difference of 995 MHz.

The Intel part's 25 W TDP provides a clear efficiency marker. The AMD part draws 55 W, which is 30 W higher. On a per-watt basis, the AMD part delivers roughly 0.279 TFLOPS per watt of FP32, while the Intel part delivers roughly 0.246 TFLOPS per watt. These derived figures indicate the AMD part maintains a modest FP32 efficiency edge despite its higher absolute power draw.

The AMD part's 308 mm² die size on 4 nm TSMC process compares against an unknown Intel die size on 3 nm Intel process. The smaller process node may help the Intel part achieve its lower TDP, though the database does not record die dimensions to confirm this.

Both GPUs use system shared memory, so bandwidth figures are system dependent and cannot be compared directly. Both support the same API feature set, including DirectX 12 Ultimate with the 12_2 feature level, which covers modern rendering features equally on both parts.

The release dates place the AMD part at 2025-12-31 and the Intel part at 2026-01-26, a gap of less than one month. Both are active products with no recorded successors. The predecessor entries show AMD replacing Polaris Mobile and Intel replacing HD Graphics-WM, indicating both companies positioned these as integrated solutions for portable devices.

Without benchmark measurements, the specification deltas define the competitive landscape. The AMD Radeon 8065S dominates raw throughput categories with 2.5x to 5x advantages. The Intel Arc Pro B370 counters with a 54.5% lower TDP and a smaller process node. The database will require actual benchmark entries to determine real-world performance parity or divergence.