AMD Radeon 8050S vs AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The direct benchmark comparison between the AMD Radeon 8050S and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is limited to a single shared test, but the result is decisive. In the Geekbench OpenCL compute benchmark, the RX 9070 GRE posts a score of 109,309, while the Radeon 8050S reaches 65,818. That represents a 39.8% lead for the RX 9070 GRE, a substantial margin that places the two GPUs in clearly different performance tiers. The delta is computed relative to the 8050S, meaning the 8050S trails by 39.8% in this workload.

Looking at the broader average benchmark scores, the picture becomes more nuanced. The 8050S carries an average benchmark score of 62,108 across its tested workloads, which places it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. The RX 9070 GRE, by contrast, has an average score of 57,367, putting it in the 87th percentile. This is a curious inversion: the RX 9070 GRE wins the head-to-head OpenCL test by a wide margin, yet its average score across all benchmarks is actually 4,741 points lower than the 8050S's average. The 8050S also outperforms its nearest rivals in the aggregate: it sits 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, and it beats the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56, AMD Radeon RX 7600M, and AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP by 2.5%, 2.6%, and 2.7% respectively.

The RX 9070 GRE's nearest rivals tell a different story. It trails the Intel Arc A580 by 0.7%, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM by 1.2%, the Intel Arc A570M by 1.5%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT by 1.8% in average score. These are tight margins, all within 2 percentage points, suggesting the RX 9070 GRE's average performance is clustered with a group of mid-range cards. The 8050S, by contrast, sits in a slightly higher aggregate position relative to its own rivals, with all deltas between -2.7% and +0.3%.

The single head-to-head result is unambiguous about raw compute throughput: the RX 9070 GRE delivers nearly 40% more OpenCL performance. But the average score data indicates the 8050S is no slouch in overall benchmark standing, ranking two percentile points higher despite losing the direct comparison. This tension between the specific OpenCL result and the aggregate scores is worth keeping in mind when evaluating these two GPUs for different workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on the same 4 nm TSMC process node, but they diverge sharply in almost every other architectural aspect. The Radeon 8050S uses the Strix Halo chip with RDNA 3.5 architecture, belonging to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. The Radeon RX 9070 GRE uses the Navi 48 chip with RDNA 4.0 architecture, part of the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation. RDNA 4.0 is a newer iteration, and the data suggests it brings substantial compute improvements per shading unit.

Die size and transistor counts reveal the physical differences. The 8050S has a die size of 308 mm², while the RX 9070 GRE's die is larger at 357 mm². The RX 9070 GRE packs 53,900 million transistors, whereas the 8050S's transistor count is listed as unknown. The RX 9070 GRE's transistor density is given as 151.0M per mm², a figure not available for the 8050S. The RX 9070 GRE's predecessor is listed as Navi III, while the 8050S's predecessor is Polaris Mobile, indicating the two come from different lineage paths within AMD's mobile and desktop lineups.

Compute resources differ significantly. The RX 9070 GRE has 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and 48 ray tracing cores. The 8050S has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. In every category, the RX 9070 GRE has 50% more units: 1,024 more shading units, 64 more TMUs, 32 more ROPs, and 16 more ray tracing cores. This scaling is reflected in the theoretical throughput figures: the RX 9070 GRE reaches 34.28 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1), while the 8050S achieves 11.47 TFLOPS in both. That is a nearly threefold difference in raw compute peak, far larger than the 50% unit count difference, indicating the RDNA 4.0 architecture delivers significantly higher per-unit efficiency.

Clock speeds tell a complementary story. The RX 9070 GRE has a base clock of 1420 MHz and a boost clock of 2790 MHz, with a game clock of 2220 MHz. The 8050S has a lower base clock of 1295 MHz but a slightly higher boost clock of 2800 MHz. The RX 9070 GRE's higher base clock and game clock suggest it can sustain higher frequencies under load, though the boost clocks are nearly identical. Pixel and texture rates follow the unit counts: the RX 9070 GRE produces 267.8 GPixel/s and 535.7 GTexel/s, versus 179.2 GPixel/s and 358.4 GTexel/s for the 8050S.

Memory architecture is a fundamental differentiator. The 8050S uses system shared memory, with size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent. The RX 9070 GRE has dedicated 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock for the RX 9070 GRE is 2250 MHz, with 18 Gbps effective data rate. This dedicated memory configuration gives the RX 9070 GRE a major advantage in bandwidth-sensitive workloads, while the 8050S's performance will vary depending on the host system's memory.

Power and physical specifications diverge as well. The 8050S has a TDP of 55 W and is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors, fitting into a single slot. The RX 9070 GRE has a TDP of 220 W, is dual-slot, and requires two 8-pin power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. The 8050S's display outputs are portable device dependent, while the RX 9070 GRE offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a. Both support PCIe 5.0 x16, DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 9070 GRE wins decisively in raw compute and memory bandwidth. Its 39.8% lead in Geekbench OpenCL is the clearest indicator of its superior throughput for compute-heavy tasks. The 34.28 TFLOPS FP32 figure versus 11.47 TFLOPS for the 8050S points to a large advantage in any workload that scales with shading unit count and clock speed. The 432.0 GB/s dedicated memory bandwidth, compared to the 8050S's system-shared memory, gives the RX 9070 GRE a significant edge in texture-heavy rendering and large dataset processing. The 50% more ray tracing cores (48 versus 32) also suggests better ray-traced performance, though no direct ray tracing benchmark is available in the data.

The 8050S wins in aggregate benchmark standing and efficiency. Its average benchmark score of 62,108 places it in the 89th percentile, two points higher than the RX 9070 GRE's 87th percentile. The 8050S also outperforms all four of its nearest rivals in average score, while the RX 9070 GRE trails all four of its nearest rivals. This suggests the 8050S is better optimized across a range of workloads in the benchmark database, even if it loses the single shared test. The 55 W TDP versus 220 W means the 8050S delivers its performance at a quarter of the power draw, making it far more suitable for thermally constrained or battery-powered systems. Its IGP form factor with no power connectors also means it can be deployed in compact devices where a dual-slot card with two 8-pin connectors would not fit.

For gaming and graphics workloads, the RX 9070 GRE's dedicated 12 GB GDDR6 memory and higher pixel rate (267.8 GPixel/s versus 179.2 GPixel/s) make it the stronger choice for high-resolution rendering. The 8050S, relying on system shared memory, will be bottlenecked by the host system's memory bandwidth and capacity. For compute tasks that fit within the shared memory pool, the 8050S's 89th percentile standing suggests it performs admirably relative to its class, but the RX 9070 GRE's raw numbers are simply higher across the board.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on use case. The RX 9070 GRE is the pick for anyone needing maximum raw performance in a discrete GPU form factor. Its 39.8% OpenCL lead, 34.28 TFLOPS FP32, 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 12 GB dedicated VRAM make it the superior choice for demanding graphics, rendering, and compute workloads. The 220 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate it is meant for desktop or large chassis systems where power and cooling are not constraints. Its launch MSRP is 549 USD, a single data point that does not factor into performance analysis but is available for reference.

The 8050S is the pick for integrated, power-efficient systems. Its 55 W TDP, IGP form factor, and system shared memory make it suitable for laptops and compact devices. Despite losing the head-to-head OpenCL test, its 89th percentile average score and positive delta against all nearest rivals show it is a well-rounded performer in its class. The 8050S also benefits from a newer release date of 2025-01-05 versus the RX 9070 GRE's 2025-05-07, though both are listed as Active in production status.

Benchmark results indicate the RX 9070 GRE is the stronger GPU in absolute terms, but the 8050S offers competitive aggregate performance at a fraction of the power. Users with flexibility in chassis size and power budget should choose the RX 9070 GRE. Users prioritizing portability and efficiency should choose the 8050S. The 87th versus 89th percentile gap is small, but the architecture and memory differences are large enough to make the choice scenario-dependent.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S has an average benchmark score of 62,108, while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has an average score of 57,367.

Q: What is the performance difference in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The RX 9070 GRE scores 109,309 versus 65,818 for the 8050S, a 39.8% lead for the RX 9070 GRE.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The RX 9070 GRE has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 8050S uses system shared memory, with size and bandwidth dependent on the host system.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for the two GPUs?

A: The 8050S has a TDP of 55 W, while the RX 9070 GRE has a TDP of 220 W.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The RX 9070 GRE has 3,072 shading units, compared to 2,048 for the 8050S, a difference of 1,024 units.

Q: What process node are both GPUs built on?

A: Both the 8050S and the RX 9070 GRE are built on a 4 nm TSMC process node.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 8050S | AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 4.0 |

| Chip | Strix Halo | Navi 48 |

| Die Size | 308 mm² | 357 mm² |

| Transistors | Unknown | 53,900 million |

| Transistor Density | N/A | 151.0M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | 1420 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2800 MHz | 2790 MHz |

| Game Clock | N/A | 2220 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 3072 |

| TMUs | 128 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 48 |

| FP32 Performance | 11.47 TFLOPS | 34.28 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1) | 34.28 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| Pixel Rate | 179.2 GPixel/s | 267.8 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 358.4 GTexel/s | 535.7 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 55 W | 220 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | N/A | 550 W |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2025-05-07 |

| Predecessor | Polaris Mobile | Navi III |

| Launch MSRP | N/A | 549 USD |