AMD Radeon 8050S vs AMD Radeon PRO V710 Comparison

# The Verdict

The AMD Radeon 8050S and AMD Radeon PRO V710 serve fundamentally different roles despite both carrying AMD branding. The data shows a clear split: the Radeon PRO V710 dominates in raw compute performance, while the Radeon 8050S offers a highly efficient integrated solution. The PRO V710's Geekbench OpenCL score of 116,460 is 43.5% higher than the 8050S's 65,818, making it the unequivocal choice for compute-heavy workloads where dedicated memory and higher throughput matter. The 8050S, by contrast, posts an average benchmark score of 62,108 compared to the PRO V710's 58,657, meaning the integrated part actually holds a slight edge in overall average across all tested scenarios. This apparent paradox—lower peak compute but higher average score—suggests the 8050S is more consistent across diverse tasks, while the PRO V710's massive OpenCL lead is offset by its weaker showing in other tests. For users requiring maximum raw compute, the PRO V710 is the data-backed pick. For those needing a versatile, low-power integrated solution, the 8050S wins on balance. The PRO V710 sits in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, while the 8050S ranks in the 89th, indicating both are high-performing parts, but their strengths diverge sharply.

# Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on different generations of RDNA architecture and different manufacturing processes. The Radeon 8050S uses RDNA 3.5 on a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0 on a 5 nm TSMC process. This node advantage gives the 8050S a smaller die at 308 mm² versus the PRO V710's 346 mm², despite the 8050S having far fewer transistors—the PRO V710 packs 28,100 million transistors with a density of 81.2M per mm², while the 8050S's transistor count is listed as unknown. The chip identities differ too: the 8050S is built on the Strix Halo chip, whereas the PRO V710 uses Navi 32 with the codename "Wheat Nas." The 8050S belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation, while the PRO V710 is part of the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series).

Core configuration reveals substantial differences. The PRO V710 has 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, 96 raster operation units, and 54 ray tracing cores. The 8050S has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 RT cores. This means the PRO V710 has roughly 69% more shading units, 69% more TMUs, 50% more ROPs, and 69% more RT cores. Clock speeds tell a different story: the 8050S has a base clock of 1295 MHz and boost of 2800 MHz, while the PRO V710 has a higher base of 1900 MHz but a lower boost of 2000 MHz. The memory subsystem is entirely different—the 8050S uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, while the PRO V710 has 28 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. Power consumption reflects this: the 8050S draws only 55 W as an integrated GPU (IGP), while the PRO V710 requires 158 W and a single 8-pin power connector with a suggested 450 W PSU. The bus interface also differs: PCIe 5.0 x16 for the 8050S versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for the PRO V710. The PRO V710 has no display outputs, while the 8050S's outputs are portable-device dependent.

# Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data points to distinct use-case advantages. The Radeon PRO V710 is the compute champion, delivering a Geekbench OpenCL score of 116,460 versus the 8050S's 65,818—a 43.5% advantage. This makes the PRO V710 the clear winner for OpenCL-heavy applications such as scientific computing, machine learning inference, or any workload that leverages parallel compute through OpenCL. Its 28 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample capacity and throughput for large datasets, whereas the 8050S relies on system-shared memory with bandwidth that is system-dependent, potentially bottlenecking memory-intensive tasks.

The Radeon 8050S, however, wins on efficiency and integration. Its 55 W TDP is less than one-third of the PRO V710's 158 W, making it suitable for portable devices where power budgets are tight. The 8050S also has a higher boost clock at 2800 MHz versus the PRO V710's 2000 MHz, which can benefit burst workloads. Its average benchmark score of 62,108 slightly edges out the PRO V710's 58,657, suggesting the 8050S performs more consistently across a broader range of tests. The 8050S's pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s are lower than the PRO V710's 192.0 GPixel/s and 432.0 GTexel/s, but the gap is narrower than the FP32 compute difference would suggest. The 8050S is also newer (released 2025-01-05 versus 2024-10-02) and remains in active production, while the PRO V710's production status is not specified.

# FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has significantly higher compute performance, with 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1) versus the Radeon 8050S's 11.47 TFLOPS in both. In Geekbench OpenCL, the PRO V710 scores 116,460, which is 43.5% higher than the 8050S's 65,818.

Q: How do their memory configurations compare?

A: They are fundamentally different. The Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon 8050S uses system-shared memory with a system-shared bus width and system-dependent bandwidth, meaning its performance depends on the host system's memory.

Q: Which GPU is more power-efficient?

A: The Radeon 8050S is far more power-efficient, with a 55 W TDP compared to the Radeon PRO V710's 158 W. The 8050S is an integrated GPU requiring no power connectors, while the PRO V710 needs a single 8-pin connector and a suggested 450 W PSU.

Q: What are the architectural differences between these two GPUs?

A: The Radeon 8050S uses RDNA 3.5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process with the Strix Halo chip, while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0 on a 5 nm TSMC process with the Navi 32 chip. The PRO V710 has more shading units (3,456 vs 2,048), TMUs (216 vs 128), ROPs (96 vs 64), and RT cores (54 vs 32).

Q: Which GPU has better overall benchmark scores?

A: Despite the PRO V710's massive OpenCL lead, the Radeon 8050S has a slightly higher average benchmark score of 62,108 compared to the PRO V710's 58,657. The 8050S also ranks in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, one point higher than the PRO V710's 88th percentile.

Q: Can both GPUs run modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. However, the Radeon PRO V710 has no display outputs, making it unsuitable for direct graphics output, while the 8050S's display outputs are portable-device dependent.

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only shared benchmark between the two GPUs is Geekbench OpenCL, and the results are stark. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 116,460, while the AMD Radeon 8050S scores 65,818, yielding a deltaPct of -43.5% for the 8050S. This means the PRO V710 outperforms the 8050S by nearly 77% in raw OpenCL compute—a decisive margin that underscores the PRO V710's positioning as a compute-oriented workstation part.

The PRO V710's FP32 throughput of 27.65 TFLOPS is 2.4 times higher than the 8050S's 11.47 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 432.0 GTexel/s exceeds the 8050S's 358.4 GTexel/s by about 20.5%, and its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s beats the 8050S's 179.2 GPixel/s by about 7.1%. Memory bandwidth is where the gap becomes enormous: 504.0 GB/s dedicated GDDR6 versus system-dependent shared memory, which could be a fraction of that figure depending on the host system.

Yet the 8050S wins on other metrics. Its boost clock of 2800 MHz is 40% higher than the PRO V710's 2000 MHz. Its average benchmark score of 62,108 beats the PRO V710's 58,657 by about 5.9%. In the nearest rival comparisons, the 8050S sits 0.3% above the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (61,896) and 2.5% below the Radeon Pro Vega 56 (63,693), while the PRO V710 sits 0.2% above the NVIDIA P102-100 (58,528) and 0.5% above the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392). These relative positions suggest the 8050S competes in a slightly higher average-performance tier despite its much lower peak compute.

The data paints a nuanced picture: the PRO V710 is a specialist that excels at compute but may underperform in other areas, dragging its average down. The 8050S is a generalist that delivers solid performance across the board without reaching the PRO V710's compute peaks.

# Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 8050S | AMD Radeon PRO V710 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 3.0 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |

| Die Size | 308 mm² | 346 mm² |

| Transistors | Unknown | 28,100 million |

| Transistor Density | N/A | 81.2M / mm² |

| Chip | Strix Halo | Navi 32 (Wheat Nas) |

| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | 1900 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2800 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 28 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 224 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 504.0 GB/s |

| Memory Clock | System Shared | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 3456 |

| TMUs | 128 | 216 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 32 | 54 |

| Pixel Rate | 179.2 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 358.4 GTexel/s | 432.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 11.47 TFLOPS | 27.65 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1) | 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 158 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Single-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | N/A | 450 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2024-10-02 |

| Production Status | Active | Not specified |

| Predecessor | Polaris Mobile | Radeon Pro Vega |