AMD Radeon 8050S vs AMD Radeon 8060S Comparison

The AMD Radeon 8050S and AMD Radeon 8060S are both integrated graphics solutions built on the Strix Halo chip, sharing the same RDNA 3.5 architecture and 4 nm TSMC process. However, benchmark results show the 8060S is decisively faster, winning both head-to-head tests, while the 8050S holds a higher overall percentile ranking. This analysis breaks down where each GPU stands, what drives the performance gap, and how they compare against their nearest rivals.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Radeon 8060S outperforms the 8050S in every direct comparison available. In Geekbench OpenCL, the 8060S scores 84,626 against the 8050S’s 65,818, a delta of -22.2% from the perspective of the 8050S. That translates to roughly 28.6% higher raw performance for the 8060S. The Vulkan result is even more lopsided. The 8060S posts 80,483, while the 8050S manages 58,398, a -27.4% delta, meaning the 8060S is about 37.8% faster in this API.

These are substantial margins. The 8060S’s wins are not narrow — they represent a clear tier separation within the same Strix Halo family. The 8050S does not win a single benchmark test in the head-to-head data, with winsA at 0 and winsB at 2. The 8060S’s lead is consistent across both compute-oriented (OpenCL) and graphics-oriented (Vulkan) workloads, suggesting a broad architectural advantage rather than API-specific optimization.

Interestingly, the 8050S holds a higher percentile rank among all GPUs — 89th percentile versus the 8060S’s 87th. This appears contradictory given the 8060S’s benchmark wins, but it reflects the distribution of scores across the entire GPU landscape. The 8050S’s average benchmark score of 62,108 places it near rivals like the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (61,896, +0.3% delta) and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (63,693, -2.5% delta). The 8060S, despite its higher raw scores, has an average of only 55,757 because its benchmark pool includes the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test (2,162), which drags down the average. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55,698, +0.1% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 (56,083, -0.6% delta).

Where Each One Wins

The 8060S is the clear winner across the board in raw performance. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 84,626 puts it firmly ahead of the 8050S, and the Vulkan score of 80,483 reinforces that dominance. For users prioritizing compute throughput or Vulkan-based gaming, the 8060S is the obvious choice. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 2,162, while not directly comparable to the 8050S (which lacks this test in its results), indicates the 8060S can handle modern DX12 workloads at a measurable level.

The 8050S, however, has its own niche. Its 89th percentile ranking means it outperforms 89% of all GPUs in the database, which is remarkable for an integrated graphics processor. Its average benchmark score of 62,108 is higher than the 8060S’s 55,757, purely because the 8050S’s benchmark set excludes the demanding Steel Nomad test. If you look only at the shared Geekbench tests, the 8060S wins every time, but the 8050S offers a more consistent performance profile across the tests it does run. For lightweight or legacy workloads, the 8050S’s lower raw power may be sufficient, and its higher percentile indicates it sits in a sweet spot relative to the broader GPU market.

Neither GPU has a win in the head-to-head tests for the 8050S — it loses both. But the 8050S is not without merit: it achieves its scores with fewer shading units and lower boost clocks, which could translate to more efficient operation in thermally constrained portable devices. The 8060S is the performance pick; the 8050S is the balanced alternative.

Architecture Differences

Both GPUs are built on the Strix Halo chip, which is a unified design for the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. They share the same RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process node. The die size is identical at 308 mm², and both have the same base clock of 1295 MHz. The transistor count is listed as unknown for both, so no comparison can be made there.

The key architectural divergence is in compute resources. The 8060S packs 2560 shading units, while the 8050S has 2048 — a 25% increase. This scales to the texture units: 160 TMUs on the 8060S versus 128 on the 8050S. Ray tracing cores follow the same pattern, with 40 on the 8060S and 32 on the 8050S. ROPs are identical at 64 for both. The boost clock also differs: the 8060S reaches 2900 MHz, while the 8050S tops out at 2800 MHz. That 100 MHz gap, combined with the extra shading units, explains the large performance delta.

The memory subsystem is shared and system-dependent for both, meaning there is no dedicated VRAM; both rely on system memory with bus width and bandwidth determined by the host platform. Both support the same API set: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The 8060S’s higher texture rate (464.0 GTexel/s versus 358.4 GTexel/s) and pixel rate (185.6 GPixel/s versus 179.2 GPixel/s) are direct consequences of its additional TMUs and higher boost clock. FP32 throughput is likewise higher on the 8060S at 14.85 TFLOPS versus 11.47 TFLOPS, with FP16 rates matching the FP32 rates at a 1:1 ratio for both.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets for the two GPUs are nearly identical, with only a handful of fields showing divergence. The most significant difference is in shading units: 2560 for the 8060S versus 2048 for the 8050S. TMUs follow at 160 versus 128. RT cores are 40 versus 32. Boost clock is 2900 MHz versus 2800 MHz. These four hardware differences drive all the performance variation.

Derived specifications also differ. Pixel rate is 185.6 GPixel/s on the 8060S versus 179.2 GPixel/s on the 8050S. Texture rate is 464.0 GTexel/s versus 358.4 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 compute are both 14.85 TFLOPS on the 8060S versus 11.47 TFLOPS on the 8050S. All other fields — process node (4 nm), die size (308 mm²), base clock (1295 MHz), TDP (55 W), slot width (IGP), power connectors (None), bus interface (PCIe 5.0 x16), display outputs (Portable Device Dependent), and APIs — are identical. Memory configuration is also the same: System Shared for size, type, bus width, and system-dependent bandwidth.

Both are listed as Active production status with a release date of January 5, 2025, and both have Polaris Mobile as their predecessor. Neither has a successor listed, and neither has a launch MSRP. The 8060S has an additional benchmark test (3DMark Steel Nomad DX12) that the 8050S lacks, which affects their average scores but not their direct comparability.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S, scoring 84,626 compared to the 8050S’s 65,818, a delta of -22.2% from the 8050S’s perspective.

Q: Does the 8050S win any benchmark against the 8060S?

A: No. The 8050S loses both head-to-head tests, with winsA at 0 and winsB at 2. The Vulkan test shows an even larger gap, with the 8060S at 80,483 versus 58,398.

Q: How does the 8060S compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080?

A: The 8060S has an average benchmark score of 55,757, which is -0.6% relative to the RTX 5080’s 56,083. The RTX 5080 is slightly ahead, but the difference is minimal.

Q: What is the main architectural difference between the two GPUs?

A: The 8060S has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 40 RT cores, versus 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 32 RT cores on the 8050S. Both share the same RDNA 3.5 architecture, 4 nm process, and 308 mm² die size.

Q: Do they have different memory configurations?

A: No. Both use System Shared memory with the same type, bus width, and system-dependent bandwidth. Neither has dedicated VRAM.

Q: Why does the 8050S have a higher percentile rank than the 8060S?

A: The 8050S sits at the 89th percentile versus the 8060S’s 87th. This is because the 8060S’s average score of 55,757 is pulled down by its inclusion of the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test (2,162), while the 8050S’s average of 62,108 is based only on its two Geekbench results.