AMD Radeon 760M vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Radeon 760M has a recorded set of benchmark results, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This means the head-to-head comparison is one-sided, but the available data still provides a useful frame for understanding where the Radeon 760M stands on its own.

The Radeon 760M delivers an average benchmark score of 6019 across all recorded tests. Its percentile ranking among all GPUs is 35, meaning it sits above roughly a third of the database's tracked graphics processors. The closest rival in terms of average score is the AMD Radeon RX 6400, which posts an average of 6001, a delta of just 0.3%. That puts the 760M essentially on par with a discrete entry-level card from the same manufacturer. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M also scores 6000 on average, again a 0.3% delta, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server scores 5996, a 0.4% delta. The only rival with a higher average score in this group is the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 at 6049, which beats the 760M by 0.5%.

Looking at individual test results, the 760M shows its strongest showing in synthetic graphics workloads. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 30336, which is notably higher than its OpenCL result of 20255. That gap indicates the RDNA 3.0 architecture handles Vulkan workloads particularly well relative to OpenCL. In PassMark's G3D test, the 760M scores 5310, and in GPU compute it scores 2840. The DirectX 9 test yields a score of 65, while DirectX 11 scores 52, DirectX 12 scores 25, and DirectX 10 scores 19. The PassMark G2D result is 890, which covers 2D rendering performance rather than 3D.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test gives a score of 400. That is a low absolute number, but it aligns with the 760M's position as an integrated graphics processor aimed at thin-and-light systems. The data indicates the 760M is not designed for high-end DX12 gaming, but its Vulkan and OpenCL results show it can handle compute-heavy tasks reasonably well for an IGP.

Because the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no benchmark entries, there is no recorded win or loss for either part. The database shows zero wins for both items in head-to-head tests. The LX MAX's percentile of 50 is listed, but with an average score of 0 and no individual test results, that percentile cannot be cross-referenced against any measured performance. The Radeon 760M's 35th percentile is supported by actual scores, making it the only quantitative performance reference in this comparison.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon 760M?

A: The Radeon 760M has an average benchmark score of 6019 across all recorded tests, with a percentile ranking of 35 among all GPUs.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The LX MAX has an empty benchmark list, an average score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed in the database.

Q: How does the Radeon 760M compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Radeon 760M is within 0.5% of four nearby GPUs. It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, and 0.5% behind the NVIDIA Quadro P2000.

Q: Which API workloads show the strongest results for the Radeon 760M?

A: The Geekbench Vulkan score is 30336, which is significantly higher than the OpenCL score of 20255. PassMark G3D reaches 5310, while GPU compute hits 2840.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Lisuan Tech LX MAX?

A: The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s and memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the process node difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Radeon 760M is built on TSMC's 4 nm node, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses TSMC's 6 nm node.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated graphics processor built on the Phoenix chip, using the RDNA 3.0 architecture. It belongs to the Navi III IGP generation and is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 142.6 million per mm². The 760M has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. It also includes 8 ray tracing cores, which is notable for an IGP. The base clock is 800 MHz, with a boost clock of 2599 MHz. Memory is system shared, meaning it uses the host system's RAM rather than dedicated VRAM. The bus width and memory bandwidth are listed as system dependent. The pixel rate is 41.58 GPixel/s, texture rate is 83.17 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 5.323 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is the same at 5.323 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a discrete GPU built on the 7G106 chip, using the TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but the transistor count and die size are unknown. The LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It does not list ray tracing cores or tensor cores. The memory configuration is significantly different: 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s, texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, meaning the LX MAX doubles its FP32 throughput in half-precision workloads.

The Radeon 760M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX MAX also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but Vulkan is version 1.3, one revision lower. The 760M is an IGP with a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the LX MAX uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The 760M has no power connectors and a TDP of 15 W, whereas the LX MAX uses a single 16-pin connector, has a TDP of 225 W, and requires a suggested PSU of 550 W. The LX MAX is a dual-slot card measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The 760M's display outputs are motherboard dependent.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear split between two very different products. The AMD Radeon 760M is a low-power integrated solution with a 15 W TDP, designed for compact systems where dedicated graphics are not an option. Its benchmark results, including an average score of 6019 and a 35th percentile ranking, place it in the lower-middle range of the GPU hierarchy, close to the AMD Radeon RX 6400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M. The 760M's strength lies in Vulkan performance, where it scores 30336, and its 8 ray tracing cores provide hardware RT support that many IGPs lack. Its FP32 throughput of 5.323 TFLOPS is modest but appropriate for its power envelope.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no benchmark data, so any direct performance comparison is impossible. What the database does show is a high-spec discrete card: 6144 shading units, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 12 GB of GDDR6 with 432 GB/s bandwidth, and a 225 W TDP. Those specifications suggest a part aimed at high-throughput compute or gaming workloads, but without recorded scores, the LX MAX cannot be validated against the 760M or any other GPU. Its 50th percentile listing is not backed by measured results, so it carries no analytical weight.

For users who need a functional integrated GPU with verified numbers, the Radeon 760M is the only option with actual performance data. For users considering the LX MAX, the database currently offers no evidence of its real-world performance. The LX MAX's specifications indicate it should outperform the 760M by a wide margin in raw compute, given its FP32 figure is roughly 4.6 times higher and its texture rate is over 4.6 times higher. But the absence of benchmarks means that conclusion rests on specification sheets, not measured results. The 760M remains the safer choice if verified performance is a priority, while the LX MAX remains an unknown quantity until its benchmark entries are populated.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every major specification category.

Process and Die: The Radeon 760M uses a 4 nm TSMC node with 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The LX MAX uses a 6 nm TSMC node, but transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

Memory: The 760M uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Compute Units: The 760M has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs.

Ray Tracing: The 760M includes 8 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX does not list any ray tracing cores.

Clock Speeds: The 760M has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2599 MHz. The LX MAX has no base or boost clock listed.

Performance Rates: The 760M delivers a pixel rate of 41.58 GPixel/s, texture rate of 83.17 GTexel/s, FP32 of 5.323 TFLOPS, and FP16 of 5.323 TFLOPS (1:1). The LX MAX delivers a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s, FP32 of 24.58 TFLOPS, and FP16 of 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power and Cooling: The 760M has a TDP of 15 W, is an IGP with no power connectors, and has a slot width of IGP. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, requires a 550 W suggested PSU, and is a dual-slot card.

Dimensions: The 760M has no listed dimensions. The LX MAX measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

Bus Interface: The 760M uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Display Outputs: The 760M's outputs are motherboard dependent. The LX MAX has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

API Support: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The 760M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Release Date: The 760M was released on 2024-01-30. The LX MAX has a release date of 2026-03-16.