NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a single recorded benchmark for the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell: the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where it scores 16,408 points. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so no direct head-to-head comparison can be made from measured data. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell sits at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, indicating it outperforms the majority of recorded graphics cards in this specific test.

Against its nearest rivals, the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell delivers a narrow victory. It scores 0.3% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16,361 points) and 0.4% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (16,351 points). The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 essentially matches it, with a score of 16,415 and a delta of 0%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 edges ahead by 0.6%, scoring 16,504 points. These margins are small, all within a single percentage point, meaning the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell's performance in this test is closely clustered with several other cards.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX, with no benchmark entries, has an average benchmark score of zero and sits at the 50th percentile by default. The data cannot confirm any performance advantage or disadvantage for this card. What the recorded specifications show is a substantial gap in raw compute resources. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell delivers 126.0 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. That is a 5.1x difference in theoretical single-precision throughput. Similarly, the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell reaches 1,968.0 GTexel/s in texture fill rate versus 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX MAX, a 5.1x gap. Pixel rates differ as well: 502.5 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, a 2.6x advantage for the NVIDIA card.

Memory bandwidth also diverges sharply. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell uses 96 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, yielding 1.79 TB/s. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s. The bandwidth difference is 4.1x. These are theoretical figures, but they indicate the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is designed for workloads that demand large memory pools and high throughput, while the LX MAX targets a lower tier of performance.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to a clear hierarchy. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has a measured 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16,408, placing it in the 59th percentile. The LX MAX has no recorded scores, so its actual performance in the same test remains unquantified. Any choice between these two cards must rely on specification differences rather than direct benchmark results.

For users who need maximum FP32 compute, the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell delivers 126.0 TFLOPS, which is 5.1x the LX MAX's 24.58 TFLOPS. For memory-intensive tasks such as large model inference or high-resolution rendering, the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell's 96 GB GDDR7 with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth provides far more headroom than the LX MAX's 12 GB GDDR6 with 432.0 GB/s. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell also supports PCIe 5.0 x16, doubling the bus bandwidth of the LX MAX's PCIe 4.0 x16.

The LX MAX, however, has its own advantages. It requires a 550 W suggested PSU versus 1000 W for the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, and its 225 W TDP is significantly lower than the 600 W TDP of the NVIDIA card. The LX MAX is also physically smaller: 248 mm in length versus 304 mm, and 118 mm in height versus 137 mm. Its 48 mm width is larger than the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell's 40 mm, but the overall footprint is more compact.

Neither card has a recorded launch MSRP for the LX MAX, while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell lists at 8,565 USD. The data does not support a "better" choice universally; it supports a choice based on workload requirements, power budget, and physical space constraints.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell wins decisively in raw compute and memory capacity. Its 96 GB GDDR7 frame buffer is eight times the LX MAX's 12 GB GDDR6, which matters for datasets that exceed 12 GB. Its 1.79 TB/s bandwidth is 4.1x higher, reducing bottlenecks in texture streaming and large buffer transfers. The FP32 throughput of 126.0 TFLOPS is 5.1x the LX MAX's 24.58 TFLOPS, making it the stronger choice for simulation, scientific computing, or any FP32-heavy workload.

The LX MAX wins on power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 225 W TDP is 375 W lower than the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell's 600 W, and its 550 W suggested PSU is 450 W lower. The card measures 248 mm by 118 mm, which fits in smaller chassis where the 304 mm by 137 mm RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell might not. The LX MAX also uses a 6 nm process node versus 5 nm for the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, though both are fabricated by TSMC.

In terms of feature support, the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell includes 188 RT cores and 752 tensor cores, while the LX MAX lists no RT or tensor core counts. The LX MAX does support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell adds Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs differ: the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has 4x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the LX MAX has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, meaning the NVIDIA card supports higher display bandwidth.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher benchmark score?

A: Only the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has a recorded benchmark score: 16,408 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has 96 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, while the LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus.

Q: What is the FP32 performance difference?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell delivers 126.0 TFLOPS, which is 5.1x the LX MAX's 24.58 TFLOPS.

Q: What power supply is recommended for each?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has a suggested PSU of 1000 W and a 600 W TDP. The LX MAX has a suggested PSU of 550 W and a 225 W TDP.

Q: Do both cards support ray tracing?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell includes 188 RT cores. The LX MAX lists no RT core count in the database.

Q: What display outputs are available?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has 4x DisplayPort 2.1b. The LX MAX has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Architecture Differences

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell uses the GB202 chip based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 122.9 million per square millimeter. The LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip based on the TrueGPU architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell features 24,064 shading units, 752 TMUs, 192 ROPs, 188 RT cores, and 752 tensor cores. The LX MAX features 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no RT or tensor core counts listed. The shading unit count is 3.9x higher on the NVIDIA card. The TMU count is 3.9x higher, and the ROP count is 2x higher.

Clock behavior differs. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has a base clock of 1590 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz. The LX MAX has no recorded base or boost clocks. Memory clocks also differ: the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), while the LX MAX runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The higher effective speed on the NVIDIA card, combined with a wider bus, produces the 1.79 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s bandwidth gap.

FP16 performance also differs in ratio. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell achieves 126.0 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio to FP32. The LX MAX achieves 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, meaning its FP16 throughput is double its FP32 throughput. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell still delivers 2.6x more FP16 compute in absolute terms.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two cards:

• Chip: GB202 (NVIDIA) versus 7G106 (Lisuan Tech)
• Architecture: Blackwell 2.0 versus TrueGPU
• Generation: Blackwell PRO W (x000) versus 7G100
• Process node: 5 nm versus 6 nm (both TSMC)
• Transistors: 92,200 million versus unknown
• Die size: 750 mm² versus unknown
• Base clock: 1590 MHz versus not listed
• Boost clock: 2617 MHz versus not listed
• Memory size: 96 GB versus 12 GB
• Memory type: GDDR7 versus GDDR6
• Memory bus width: 512 bit versus 192 bit
• Memory bandwidth: 1.79 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s
• Memory clock: 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective)
• Shading units: 24,064 versus 6,144
• TMUs: 752 versus 192
• ROPs: 192 versus 96
• RT cores: 188 versus not listed
• Tensor cores: 752 versus not listed
• Pixel rate: 502.5 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 1,968.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s
• FP32: 126.0 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS
• FP16: 126.0 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: 600 W versus 225 W
• Suggested PSU: 1000 W versus 550 W
• Bus interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16
• Display outputs: 4x DisplayPort 2.1b versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
• Vulkan version: 1.4 versus 1.3
• Length: 304 mm versus 248 mm
• Height: 137 mm versus 118 mm
• Width: 40 mm versus 48 mm
• Release date: 2025-03-17 versus 2026-03-16
• Launch MSRP: 8,565 USD versus not listed
• Benchmark scores: 16,408 (3DMark Steel Nomad) versus none recorded
• Nearest rivals: four recorded versus none recorded

Both cards share a dual-slot form factor, a single 16-pin power connector, and support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. Both are marked as Active in production status.