NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

The Verdict

The data available for these two server-class graphics cards is asymmetrical. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has a recorded benchmark score of 5996 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, placing it at the 34th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores, an average score of zero, and no rival entries in the database, making a direct performance comparison impossible from the recorded data.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is positioned for workloads that demand massive memory capacity, with 96 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. It carries the full NVIDIA feature stack, including 188 RT cores, 752 tensor cores, and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its nearest rivals in the database are all mobile or low-end desktop parts, with the GeForce GTX 770M scoring 6000, the Radeon RX 6400 scoring 6001, the FirePro W4100 scoring 5987, and the Quadro K4000M scoring 5986. The RTX PRO 6000 sits within 0.2% of these scores, which is an artifact of the limited benchmark data rather than an indication of comparable performance.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses a 6 nm TSMC process with a TrueGPU architecture, 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Its FP32 compute is rated at 24.58 TFLOPS, while FP16 reaches 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The absence of benchmark data means the database cannot validate its real-world performance, and no percentile or rival information exists to anchor its standing.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is built on the GB202 chip using a 5 nm TSMC process with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. Its transistor density is 122.9 million per square millimeter. The architecture is Blackwell 2.0, part of the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip on a 6 nm TSMC process with a TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation. The database lists its transistor count and die size as unknown, so a density comparison is not possible.

Memory configuration separates the two clearly. The NVIDIA card uses 96 GB of GDDR7 with a 512-bit interface and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan card uses 12 GB of GDDR6 with a 192-bit interface and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has a memory clock of 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective data rate, while the Lisuan card runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Compute resources also differ sharply. The RTX PRO 6000 has 24,064 shading units, 752 TMUs, 192 ROPs, 188 RT cores, and 752 tensor cores. The LX MAX has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no RT core or tensor core counts listed. FP32 throughput is 126.0 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA card versus 24.58 TFLOPS for the Lisuan card. FP16 on the NVIDIA card is 126.0 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the Lisuan card reaches 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

Clock behavior differs as well. The NVIDIA card has a base clock of 1590 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz. The Lisuan card lists no base or boost clock in the database. Pixel fill rate for the NVIDIA card is 502.5 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the Lisuan card. Texture fill rate is 1,968.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

Interface and output specifications also diverge. The RTX PRO 6000 uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and four DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Both are dual-slot cards with a single 16-pin power connector, but the NVIDIA card has a 600 W TDP and a suggested 1000 W power supply, while the Lisuan card has a 225 W TDP and a suggested 550 W power supply.

API support is largely similar, with both supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3. Physical dimensions differ slightly: the RTX PRO 6000 is 267 mm long, 111 mm tall, and 40 mm wide, while the LX MAX is 248 mm long, 118 mm tall, and 48 mm wide.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data gives the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server a clear advantage in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 figure of 126.0 TFLOPS is more than five times the 24.58 TFLOPS of the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. Memory bandwidth is similarly lopsided, with 1.79 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s, a factor of roughly four. The NVIDIA card also has significantly higher pixel and texture fill rates, at 502.5 GPixel/s and 1,968.0 GTexel/s compared to 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s.

For workloads that rely on memory capacity, the NVIDIA card holds a strong position with 96 GB versus 12 GB. This favors large model inference, rendering scenes with heavy texture data, or any task where fitting data in local memory matters. The 512-bit bus and GDDR7 memory type also indicate higher memory bandwidth efficiency per clock.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins on power efficiency as a listed specification. Its 225 W TDP is significantly lower than the 600 W TDP of the NVIDIA card, and the suggested power supply of 550 W versus 1000 W reflects a lower system power requirement. The Lisuan card also has a higher memory clock at 2250 MHz versus 1750 MHz, though the effective data rate is lower at 18 Gbps versus 28 Gbps. FP16 performance on the Lisuan card is 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, which indicates a different compute ratio strategy compared to the NVIDIA card's 1:1 ratio.

The Lisuan card's smaller physical footprint, 248 mm length versus 267 mm, and slightly taller and wider profile may fit different chassis layouts. Its PCIe 4.0 interface is a generation behind the NVIDIA card's PCIe 5.0, but for some server workloads the older bus standard is sufficient.

The NVIDIA card has a recorded benchmark score and a percentile ranking, while the Lisuan card has neither. From a database perspective, the NVIDIA card is validated by at least one measurement, whereas the Lisuan card's performance profile remains unverified.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher raw FP32 compute?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server delivers 126.0 TFLOPS FP32, compared to 24.58 TFLOPS for the Lisuan Tech LX MAX, a factor of roughly five.

Q: How much memory does each card have and what type?

A: The NVIDIA card has 96 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan card has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores for the Lisuan Tech LX MAX?

A: The database lists no benchmark entries for the LX MAX. Its average benchmark score is zero, and no nearest rivals are recorded.

Q: What is the NVIDIA card's percentile ranking?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server sits at the 34th percentile among all GPUs in the database, based on its single recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5996.

Q: Do both cards support the same API versions?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: Which card has higher power requirements?

A: The NVIDIA card has a 600 W TDP and a suggested 1000 W power supply. The Lisuan card has a 225 W TDP and a suggested 550 W power supply.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. The wins counter for each card is zero, and the headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty. This means there is no single test where both cards were measured under identical conditions.

The only benchmark score in the database belongs to the NVIDIA card. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5996. That score places it at the 34th percentile across all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M with an average score of 6000 and a delta of -0.1%, the AMD Radeon RX 6400 with an average score of 6001 and a delta of -0.1%, the AMD FirePro W4100 with an average score of 5987 and a delta of 0.2%, and the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M with an average score of 5986 and a delta of 0.2%. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the Steel Nomad score alone does not separate the RTX PRO 6000 from these much smaller GPUs in this particular test.

For the Lisuan Tech LX MAX, the benchmark array is empty, the average score is zero, and the nearest rivals list is empty. No percentile is recorded, meaning the database cannot place it on any performance ranking. This is a significant gap in the available data. Any attempt to compare the two cards on measured performance must account for the fact that only one of them has any recorded measurements.

The FP32 and memory bandwidth figures provide a theoretical comparison. The NVIDIA card's 126.0 TFLOPS FP32 is 101.42 TFLOPS higher than the Lisuan card's 24.58 TFLOPS. Memory bandwidth is 1.358 TB/s higher on the NVIDIA card. Pixel fill rate is 310.5 GPixel/s higher, and texture fill rate is 1,584.0 GTexel/s higher. These are large margins, but they are specification sheet numbers, not benchmark results.

The Lisuan card does have one specification advantage in the memory clock domain: its 2250 MHz memory clock is higher than the NVIDIA card's 1750 MHz. However, the effective data rate of 18 Gbps is lower than the 28 Gbps of the NVIDIA card, and the bus width is 192 bits versus 512 bits. The combination of bus width and data rate determines bandwidth, and the NVIDIA card's 1.79 TB/s dominates the Lisuan card's 432.0 GB/s.

The database's percentile data for the NVIDIA card shows it at 34, which is below the median. This suggests that the Steel Nomad test, which is a DX12 workload, does not favor this card's architecture. The Lisuan card has no percentile, so its standing on the same ranking is unknown. The absence of any recorded test for the LX MAX means the database offers no evidence for its performance in any workload.

In terms of production status, both cards are listed as Active. The NVIDIA card was released on 2025-03-17, while the Lisuan card has a release date of 2026-03-16. The NVIDIA card has a predecessor listed as Server Hopper and a successor as Server Rubin. The Lisuan card has no predecessor or successor entries.

The dual-slot form factor and single 16-pin power connector are shared attributes. The NVIDIA card's suggested PSU is 1000 W, while the Lisuan card's is 550 W. The NVIDIA card is longer at 267 mm versus 248 mm, but narrower in height at 111 mm versus 118 mm and thinner at 40 mm versus 48 mm.

The data shows that the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is the only card in this comparison with any recorded benchmark result, and it also carries substantially higher compute and memory specifications. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX remains an unmeasured entity in the database, with its architectural details documented but no performance validation available.