NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison scenario: the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a full set of benchmark scores across ten different tests, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores at all. Consequently, the head-to-head comparison relies entirely on the NVIDIA card's measured performance and the Lisuan's theoretical specifications.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell delivers its strongest absolute result in Geekbench Vulkan, scoring 113865 points. This indicates strong graphics API performance for modern workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 106087 confirms that compute-oriented tasks also perform well on this architecture. In the Passmark suite, the G3D score of 20049 represents the card's overall graphics capability, while the G2D score of 1303 covers 2D desktop operations. Compute performance in Passmark registers at 8396.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, which stresses modern DirectX 12 rendering, shows a score of 2374.5. The legacy DirectX tests in Passmark reveal an interesting pattern: DirectX 9 scores 241, DirectX 10 scores 122, DirectX 11 scores 174, and DirectX 12 scores 80. The DirectX 9 result being the highest among these legacy tests suggests the architecture retains strong compatibility with older rendering paths.

The NVIDIA card's average benchmark score sits at 25269, placing it in the 70th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Comparing against its nearest recorded rivals, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell trails the AMD Radeon RX 6700M by 1.4 percent, the AMD Radeon Pro W5700 by 1.8 percent, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile by 1.8 percent. It leads the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile by 2.0 percent. These deltas are small, indicating the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell sits in a tightly contested performance band around the 25000 average score mark.

For the Lisuan Tech LX MAX, the absence of benchmark data means no direct score comparisons can be made. The database shows an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile placement, which reflects the lack of recorded measurements rather than actual performance. The comparison therefore shifts to architectural specifications and theoretical throughput figures.

Where Each One Wins

Based on recorded measurements, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell wins in every benchmark category where data exists. It has ten recorded test scores spanning compute, graphics, and legacy API workloads. The card's average score of 25269 places it above the database median, and its 70th percentile ranking confirms it outperforms roughly seven out of ten GPUs in the database.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in raw specification counts and theoretical throughput. Its FP32 compute reaches 24.58 TFLOPS, which is 44 percent higher than the NVIDIA card's 17.03 TFLOPS. In FP16 workloads, the Lisuan delivers 49.15 TFLOPS compared to the NVIDIA's 17.03 TFLOPS, a 189 percent advantage, though the NVIDIA card processes FP16 at a 1:1 ratio while the Lisuan uses a 2:1 ratio. The Lisuan also holds advantages in pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s versus 93.94 GPixel/s) and texture rate (384.0 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s).

Memory bandwidth favors the Lisuan significantly. Its 432.0 GB/s bandwidth exceeds the NVIDIA card's 288.0 GB/s by exactly 50 percent. The Lisuan uses a 192-bit bus with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the NVIDIA card uses a 128-bit bus with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory. The NVIDIA card compensates with a larger memory pool and newer memory technology, but the Lisuan's wider bus provides superior raw bandwidth.

The shader configuration also favors the Lisuan in raw counts. It has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The NVIDIA card has 4352 shading units, 136 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. These counts translate to the Lisuan's higher theoretical fill rates and compute throughput.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different architectural lineages. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses the GB206 chip built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The die measures 181 mm² and contains 21,900 million transistors, yielding a transistor density of 121.0 million per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip on a TrueGPU architecture, also fabricated by TSMC but on a 6 nm process. Its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

The NVIDIA card includes dedicated ray tracing cores (34 of them) and tensor cores (136 of them), which are absent from the Lisuan's recorded specifications. The NVIDIA card's Blackwell architecture supports the full modern API stack: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Lisuan also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but its Vulkan support stops at version 1.3.

Clock behavior differs markedly. The NVIDIA card has a base clock of 982 MHz and a boost clock of 1957 MHz. The Lisuan has no recorded base or boost clocks. The memory clocks differ: the NVIDIA card runs memory at 1125 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, while the Lisuan runs memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. Both achieve the same effective data rate, but the Lisuan's wider memory bus delivers more bandwidth.

Physical and power characteristics diverge substantially. The NVIDIA card consumes 70 W with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The Lisuan consumes 225 W, requires a 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W PSU. Both cards use dual-slot designs. The NVIDIA card measures 167 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The Lisuan measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, making it considerably larger in every dimension.

The bus interfaces differ: the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x8, while the Lisuan uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs also differ, with the NVIDIA card providing four mini-DisplayPort 2.1b connectors and the Lisuan providing four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors.

The NVIDIA card has a recorded release date of August 2025 and lists its predecessor as Workstation Ada. The Lisuan has a release date of March 2026 and no recorded predecessor. Both cards are marked as Active in production status.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more benchmark data?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has ten recorded benchmark scores across 3DMark, Geekbench OpenCL, Geekbench Vulkan, and multiple Passmark tests. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: How does the NVIDIA card compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell trails the AMD Radeon RX 6700M by 1.4 percent, the AMD Radeon Pro W5700 by 1.8 percent, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile by 1.8 percent in average benchmark score. It leads the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile by 2.0 percent.

Q: What memory configurations do the two cards use?

A: The NVIDIA card has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has higher theoretical compute throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has higher theoretical compute: 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 versus the NVIDIA card's 17.03 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The NVIDIA card has a 70 W TDP with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The Lisuan has a 225 W TDP, requires a 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W PSU.

Q: Which card has ray tracing and tensor cores?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 34 ray tracing cores and 136 tensor cores. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded ray tracing or tensor core counts.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Lisuan Tech LX MAX |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | TrueGPU |

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Memory size | 16 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |

| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 4352 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 136 | 192 |

| ROPs | 48 | 96 |

| Ray tracing cores | 34 | Not recorded |

| Tensor cores | 136 | Not recorded |

| FP32 performance | 17.03 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 performance | 17.03 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Pixel rate | 93.94 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 266.2 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 70 W | 225 W |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 167 mm | 248 mm |

| Height | 69 mm | 118 mm |

| Width | 20 mm | 48 mm |

| Release date | August 2025 | March 2026 |

| Average benchmark score | 25269 | 0 |

| Percentile | 70th | 50th |

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split between measured performance and theoretical capability. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the only card in this comparison with recorded benchmark scores, and those scores place it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its average score of 25269 puts it within 2 percent of several established competitors, including the AMD Radeon RX 6700M, AMD Radeon Pro W5700, and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, while leading the RTX A5000 Mobile by 2 percent.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX offers substantially higher theoretical specifications across nearly every metric: 44 percent higher FP32 throughput, 50 percent higher memory bandwidth, double the pixel rate, and 44 percent higher texture rate. It also has more shading units, TMUs, and ROPs. However, none of these specifications have been validated through recorded benchmark measurements in the database.

For users who rely on verified performance data, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the only card with supporting evidence. Its compact 167 mm length, 70 W power draw, and lack of external power connectors make it suitable for systems with limited space and modest power budgets. The inclusion of 34 ray tracing cores and 136 tensor cores provides hardware acceleration for ray-traced workloads and AI operations. The 16 GB GDDR7 memory pool on a 128-bit bus offers a larger capacity than the Lisuan's 12 GB, though at lower bandwidth.

For users who prioritize raw theoretical throughput and are willing to accommodate a larger physical footprint and higher power draw, the Lisuan Tech LX MAX presents the higher specification sheet. Its 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU indicate a more demanding installation requirement. The 192-bit memory bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth delivers superior memory throughput for bandwidth-intensive compute tasks. The 2:1 FP16 ratio suggests the architecture is optimized for mixed-precision workloads.

The production status for both cards is Active, and the Lisuan has a newer release date of March 2026 compared to the NVIDIA card's August 2025. The database contains no recorded benchmark results for the Lisuan, which means any performance assessment for that card must rely entirely on its listed specifications. The NVIDIA card's recorded results provide a verified performance baseline across multiple test suites, from modern DirectX 12 workloads to legacy DirectX 9 rendering.