NVIDIA Jetson T4000 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for both GPUs contains no populated benchmark scores, so direct performance comparisons must be derived from their hardware specifications rather than measured results. The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX occupy different segments entirely, and their specification sheets reveal where each would dominate.

The most striking difference is raw compute throughput. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the NVIDIA Jetson T4000 delivers 4.700 TFLOPS. That places the LX MAX ahead by a factor of roughly 5.2 in single-precision floating-point work. For FP16, the gap widens further: the LX MAX reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the Jetson T4000 manages 4.700 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The LX MAX therefore exceeds the T4000 by approximately 10.5 times in half-precision throughput.

Memory bandwidth tells a similar story, though with a different twist. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Jetson T4000 pairs 64 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus for 273.2 GB/s. The LX MAX leads by about 1.58 times in raw bandwidth, but the T4000 carries over five times the memory capacity.

Pixel and texture rates reinforce the LX MAX advantage. The LX MAX reaches 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s, compared to the T4000's 24.48 GPixel/s and 73.44 GTexel/s. That translates to a 7.8 times advantage in pixel throughput and a 5.2 times advantage in texture throughput for the LX MAX.

The shading unit counts align with these ratios. The LX MAX contains 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The T4000 has 1536 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. Each component scales roughly in line with the performance deltas, confirming that the LX MAX is designed for substantially heavier graphics workloads.

However, the T4000 counters with architectural features the LX MAX lacks. The T4000 includes 12 ray tracing cores and 64 tensor cores, while the LX MAX lists neither RT cores nor tensor cores in its specification. This means the T4000 has dedicated hardware for ray-traced rendering and tensor-based AI workloads, whereas the LX MAX would have to rely on its general-purpose shaders for those tasks.

The bus interface also differs. The T4000 uses PCIe 5.0 x8, while the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The newer PCIe 5.0 standard offers higher per-lane bandwidth, but the LX MAX's x16 width provides more total lanes. In practice, the LX MAX's raw bandwidth advantage may offset the protocol difference for most workloads.

Power consumption scales with performance. The LX MAX draws a 225 W TDP and requires a 550 W suggested PSU, while the T4000 draws 90 W and needs only a 250 W PSU. The LX MAX consumes 2.5 times the power, but delivers over 5 times the FP32 throughput, indicating better compute-per-watt in raw floating-point terms.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins decisively in any workload that stresses traditional rasterization, pixel filling, or texture sampling. Its 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs provide the hardware to drive high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering at high frame rates. The 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports these operations without starvation, and the 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is sufficient for most contemporary graphics workloads.

The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 wins in scenarios that require large memory capacity or specialized compute units. Its 64 GB LPDDR5X memory dwarfs the LX MAX's 12 GB allocation, making it suitable for datasets or models that exceed 12 GB. The 64 tensor cores provide dedicated matrix math acceleration, which is absent from the LX MAX specification. The 12 ray tracing cores also give the T4000 a hardware path for ray-traced effects, something the LX MAX cannot claim.

For AI inference and training, the T4000's tensor cores are the decisive factor. Even though the LX MAX has higher raw FP16 throughput, tensor cores are optimized for the matrix operations that dominate neural network workloads. The T4000's 64 tensor cores operate alongside its 1536 shading units, providing a balanced architecture for AI tasks that also require memory capacity beyond typical GPU limits.

For pure compute density, the LX MAX wins. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 put it in a different class for scientific simulation, physics calculations, or any parallel workload that maps to general-purpose shaders. The T4000's 4.700 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16 is modest by comparison.

The power envelope favors the T4000 in constrained environments. Its 90 W TDP and IGP slot width mean it can operate in systems without dedicated power connectors, while the LX MAX requires a 1x 16-pin connector and a 550 W PSU. The T4000 also fits in a much smaller physical footprint: 87 mm length, 100 mm height, and 15 mm width, versus the LX MAX's 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 uses the GB10B chip built on the Blackwell architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The die size is 391 mm², and the production status is Active. It belongs to the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation, with a predecessor in Server Hopper and a successor in Server Rubin. The T4000's release date is recorded as 2026-01-04.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip built on the TrueGPU architecture, also manufactured by TSMC but on a 6 nm process. The die size is listed as unknown, and it belongs to the 7G100 generation. The LX MAX has no predecessor or successor recorded, and its release date is 2026-03-16.

The T4000 operates at a fixed clock of 1530 MHz for both base and boost, with memory running at 1067 MHz (8.5 Gbps effective). The LX MAX has no base or boost clock listed, but its memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), which is over twice the effective memory speed of the T4000.

Memory architecture differs fundamentally. The T4000 uses 64 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus, a configuration suited for capacity and energy efficiency. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, a configuration optimized for bandwidth per pin and lower latency. The LX MAX's bandwidth advantage (432.0 GB/s versus 273.2 GB/s) comes despite a narrower bus, thanks to the faster GDDR6 memory.

The T4000 includes 12 RT cores and 64 tensor cores, features absent from the LX MAX specification. The LX MAX instead relies on a larger array of 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. This suggests the LX MAX targets raw rasterization throughput, while the T4000 offers specialized acceleration for ray tracing and tensor operations.

API support also diverges. The LX MAX supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, making it compatible with modern gaming and graphics APIs. The T4000 lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, indicating it has no display outputs and likely no graphics API support in the traditional sense. The T4000 is a compute-oriented device without display outputs, while the LX MAX provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs for direct display connection.

The Verdict

The data indicates two GPUs built for entirely different purposes. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a graphics-first card with 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 192.0 GPixel/s, 384.0 GTexel/s, and full DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3 support. Its 12 GB GDDR6 memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth serve rasterization and rendering workloads. The 225 W TDP and dual-slot design confirm it as a dedicated graphics accelerator.

The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 is a compute-first module with 64 GB LPDDR5X memory, 64 tensor cores, and 12 ray tracing cores. Its 1530 MHz fixed clock and 90 W TDP, combined with an IGP slot width and no power connectors, position it for embedded or server deployments where power and space are constrained. The 5 nm Blackwell architecture and 391 mm² die size indicate a modern design focused on AI and specialized compute.

Users who need raw graphics throughput, high frame rates, or real-time rendering should select the LX MAX. Its 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs provide the execution resources for demanding visual workloads. The 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth prevents bottlenecks in texture-heavy scenes, and the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs allow direct connection to monitors.

Users who need large memory capacity, tensor acceleration, or ray tracing hardware should select the T4000. Its 64 GB memory exceeds the LX MAX's capacity by over five times, making it suitable for large models or datasets. The 64 tensor cores provide dedicated AI compute, and the 12 RT cores enable ray-traced workloads. The 90 W TDP and compact dimensions make it deployable in systems where the LX MAX would not fit.

The percentile data places both GPUs at 50 percent against all GPUs, but this reflects the absence of benchmark scores rather than actual performance equivalence. The specification sheet shows the LX MAX as the clear winner in rasterization and raw compute, while the T4000 wins in memory capacity and specialized acceleration.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS, compared to the NVIDIA Jetson T4000's 4.700 TFLOPS, placing the LX MAX roughly 5.2 times ahead.

Q: Does the NVIDIA Jetson T4000 support DirectX or Vulkan?

A: No, the T4000 lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, and it has no display outputs. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3.

Q: How does memory capacity compare between the two?

A: The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 has 64 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The T4000 offers over five times the capacity.

Q: Which GPU has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX reaches 432.0 GB/s, while the NVIDIA Jetson T4000 reaches 273.2 GB/s, giving the LX MAX approximately 1.58 times the bandwidth.

Q: Does either GPU include ray tracing or tensor cores?

A: The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 includes 12 ray tracing cores and 64 tensor cores. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX lists neither RT cores nor tensor cores in its specification.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 has a 90 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 250 W, with no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a 225 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 550 W, using a 1x 16-pin connector.

Specification Differences

| Field | NVIDIA Jetson T4000 | Lisuan Tech LX MAX |

|-------|---------------------|---------------------|

| Chip | GB10B | 7G106 |

| Architecture | Blackwell | TrueGPU |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Die Size | 391 mm² | unknown |

| Base Clock | 1530 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 1530 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | 1067 MHz 8.5 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 64 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 273.2 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1536 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 48 | 192 |

| ROPs | 16 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 12 | null |

| Tensor Cores | 64 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 24.48 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 73.44 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 4.700 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 4.700 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 90 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | N/A | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL | N/A | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |

| Length | 87 mm 3.4 inches | 248 mm 9.8 inches |

| Height | 100 mm 3.9 inches | 118 mm 4.6 inches |

| Width | 15 mm 0.6 inches | 48 mm 1.9 inches |

| Launch MSRP | 1,999 USD | null |