NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

The database compares the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 with the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. The RTX 5090 is a 5 nm Blackwell 2.0 card with 32 GB of GDDR7 and an average benchmark score of 79842, while the LX MAX is a 6 nm TrueGPU card with 12 GB of GDDR6 and an average benchmark score of 0. No head-to-head benchmark results are recorded for this pair, so the analysis relies on the RTX 5090 standalone scores, the nearest-rival data, and the specification fields.

Where Each One Wins

Every recorded standalone benchmark score belongs to the RTX 5090. The LX MAX has an empty benchmark list, and the head-to-head win counters are 0 for both cards because no direct runs exist.

The RTX 5090 scores 18355 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 334370 in Geekbench OpenCL, 376728 in Geekbench Vulkan, 39650 in Passmark G3D, 26756 in Passmark GPU Compute, 1413 in Passmark G2D, 395 in Passmark DirectX 9, 226 in Passmark DirectX 10, 341 in Passmark DirectX 11, and 185 in Passmark DirectX 12. The LX MAX has no score in any of these tests, so no use-case win can be assigned to it from benchmark data.

The recorded advantages for the LX MAX are specification-level: 225 W TDP versus 575 W, 550 W suggested PSU versus 950 W, 248 mm length versus 304 mm, and 118 mm height versus 137 mm. Those are not measured wins, but they are the only recorded fields where the LX MAX leads.

Architecture Differences

The two cards use different silicon and different feature sets. The RTX 5090 uses the GB202 chip on NVIDIA Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm TSMC process. The LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip on a TrueGPU architecture in the 7G100 generation, built on a 6 nm TSMC process. The RTX 5090 integrates 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die with a transistor density of 122.9M per mm². The LX MAX has no recorded transistor count, die size, or density. The recorded data has no cache entries for either card.

Memory architecture is sharply different. The RTX 5090 uses 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus with 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks are 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for the RTX 5090 and 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the LX MAX.

Core resources also differ. The RTX 5090 has 21760 shading units, 680 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 170 RT cores, and 680 tensor cores. The LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no RT cores and no tensor cores recorded. Pixel rates are 423.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rates are 1,636.8 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 104.8 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 throughput is 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

Both cards are dual-slot parts with a single 16-pin power connector, and both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 5090 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. The RTX 5090 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, and the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head array is empty. There are no direct runs pairing the RTX 5090 against the LX MAX, and the win counters show 0 for each side. The largest recorded score in the RTX 5090 standalone set is 376728 in Geekbench Vulkan, followed by 334370 in Geekbench OpenCL. The LX MAX has no recorded scores, so there are no reverse wins to walk through.

The only comparative performance context in the database comes from the RTX 5090 nearest rivals. The RTX 5090 average score of 79842 is 0.3% above the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (79605), 0.6% above the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (79396), 1.1% above the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (78940), and 1.4% below the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X (80959). The LX MAX has no nearest rivals listed.

FAQ

Q: Does the LX MAX have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the LX MAX, its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile ranking is 50. The RTX 5090 has an average benchmark score of 79842 and a percentile ranking of 92.

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5090. It delivers 1.79 TB/s over a 512-bit GDDR7 bus with 32 GB capacity. The LX MAX delivers 432.0 GB/s over a 192-bit GDDR6 bus with 12 GB capacity.

Q: Do both cards support the same APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 5090 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: Are ray tracing and tensor cores present on both cards?

A: No. The RTX 5090 lists 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores. The LX MAX lists no RT cores and no tensor cores.

Q: What are the power delivery differences?

A: The RTX 5090 has a TDP of 575 W and a suggested PSU of 950 W. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W. Both use one 16-pin power connector.

Q: Which card is larger?

A: The RTX 5090 is 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 40 mm wide. The LX MAX is 248 mm long, 118 mm high, and 48 mm wide. The RTX 5090 is longer and taller, while the LX MAX is thicker.

The Verdict

The recorded data gives the measured-performance pick to the RTX 5090 without qualification. It holds every recorded benchmark score, an average score of 79842, and a 92nd percentile rank. The LX MAX holds a 50th percentile rank and an average score of 0. In any test where a number exists, the RTX 5090 is the only card with a result.

The LX MAX becomes the pick only when the requirement is a lower power envelope and a smaller length and height. It has 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU, compared with 575 W and 950 W. It is 248 mm long and 118 mm high, versus 304 mm and 137 mm. It also provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the RTX 5090 provides one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The RTX 5090 leads every recorded performance field and most specification fields, including memory capacity, bandwidth, core counts, and FP32 throughput. No benchmark evidence exists to place the LX MAX ahead of the RTX 5090 in any performance test.

Specification Differences

| Field | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | Lisuan Tech LX MAX |

|---|---|---|

| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | Unknown |

| Series | GeForce 50-series | not listed |

| Chip | GB202 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | TrueGPU |

| Generation | GeForce 50 | 7G100 |

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 92,200 million | unknown |

| Die size | 750 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor density | 122.9M / mm² | not listed |

| Base clock | 2017 MHz | not listed |

| Boost clock | 2407 MHz | not listed |

| Memory clock | 1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 32 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |

| Memory bus width | 512 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 1.79 TB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 21760 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 680 | 192 |

| ROPs | 176 | 96 |

| RT cores | 170 | not listed |

| Tensor cores | 680 | not listed |

| Pixel rate | 423.6 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 1,636.8 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 104.8 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 575 W | 225 W |

| Suggested PSU | 950 W | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | 304 mm x 137 mm x 40 mm | 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm |

| Release date | 2025-01-29 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 1,999 USD | not listed |

| Predecessor | GeForce 40 | not listed |

| Successor | GeForce 60 | not listed |