NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the average benchmark scores of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX compare?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB has an average benchmark score of 4901, placing it in the 29th percentile of all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, with an average benchmark score of 0, though it is placed in the 50th percentile.

Q: What memory configurations do the two cards use?

A: The NVIDIA card uses 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB delivers 23.70 TFLOPS FP32. The Lisuan card is approximately 3.7% ahead in raw FP32 performance.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB has a TDP of 180 W with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: What is the process node for each GPU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB is built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is built on TSMC's 6 nm process, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown.

Q: How do the nearest rivals for the NVIDIA card compare in average score?

A: The AMD FirePro W5130M scores 4904 (0.1% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 scores 4893 (0.2% lower), and both the AMD Radeon R7 M265 and R7 M360 score 4929 and 4931 respectively, which are 0.6% higher than the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB.

The Verdict

The data shows two cards with fundamentally different profile positions. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB is a fully benchmarked product with an average score of 4901, sitting at the 29th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals, the AMD FirePro W5130M at 4904 and the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 at 4893, bracket its score closely, indicating that its measured performance clusters tightly around these older or lower-tier parts.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark results. The database lists its average score as 0 with no nearest rivals, but assigns it a 50th percentile rank. This discrepancy means any direct performance comparison relies on specification analysis rather than measured outcomes.

For users who require verified performance data, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB is the only card with concrete benchmark evidence. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4019 and PassMark G3D score of 21981 provide measurable reference points. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX offers a larger memory pool at 12 GB, a wider 192-bit memory bus, and higher raw compute figures including 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, but none of these are validated by benchmark results.

The specification comparison suggests the Lisuan card targets tasks with high memory capacity demands, while the NVIDIA card brings a complete driver and feature stack with known performance characteristics. The choice depends on whether verified performance or unmeasured hardware potential takes priority.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two cards. The wins tally shows 0 for each side. Consequently, the comparison relies on the individual benchmark scores recorded for the NVIDIA card and the specification-derived performance estimates for the Lisuan card.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB records a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4019. Its PassMark results include 21981 in G3D, 11365 in GPU compute, 1169 in G2D, 228 in DirectX 9, 220 in DirectX 11, 142 in DirectX 10, and 82 in DirectX 12. These figures establish a baseline for the card's real-world behavior across multiple API generations.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no scores in any test category. Its GPU compute capability can only be inferred from its FP32 and FP16 figures. The FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio suggests strong compute acceleration for workloads that utilize half-precision arithmetic, but no benchmark confirms this.

The absence of measured data for the Lisuan card means the only quantitative comparison available is the FP32 and FP16 compute numbers. The Lisuan card leads FP32 by 24.58 TFLOPS versus 23.70 TFLOPS, a margin of 0.88 TFLOPS. In FP16, the Lisuan card's 49.15 TFLOPS substantially exceeds the NVIDIA card's 23.70 TFLOPS, which operates at a 1:1 ratio with FP32.

Pixel and texture rates also favor the Lisuan card. It delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s, while the NVIDIA card delivers 123.5 GPixel/s and 370.4 GTexel/s. The pixel rate advantage of 68.5 GPixel/s is particularly notable for fill-rate-bound scenarios.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every major specification category. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB uses the GB206 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip with TrueGPU architecture.

Process technology separates them: the NVIDIA card uses TSMC's 5 nm node, the Lisuan card uses TSMC's 6 nm node. The NVIDIA card lists 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, while the Lisuan card has unknown transistor count and die size.

Memory configurations diverge significantly. The NVIDIA card has 8 GB GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan card has 12 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has a small bandwidth advantage of 16 GB/s, but the Lisuan card offers 50% more capacity.

Clock speeds differ in structure. The NVIDIA card lists base and boost clocks of 2407 MHz and 2572 MHz respectively. The Lisuan card has no base or boost clocks recorded. Memory clocks show 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for NVIDIA and 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for Lisuan.

Power delivery separates them too. The NVIDIA card consumes 180 W TDP with a single 8-pin connector and a 450 W suggested PSU. The Lisuan card consumes 225 W TDP with a single 16-pin connector and a 550 W suggested PSU.

Bus interfaces differ: the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x8, the Lisuan card uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs also differ, with NVIDIA providing 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while Lisuan provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Physical dimensions show slight differences. The NVIDIA card measures 241 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Lisuan card measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. Both are dual-slot cards.

API support shows minor divergence. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB206 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. It contains 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, 48 raster output units, 36 RT cores, and 144 tensor cores. The transistor density measures 121.0M per mm².

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the TrueGPU architecture on the 7G106 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process. It contains 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The card lists no RT cores and no tensor cores in the database. Transistor density is not recorded.

The shading unit count favors the Lisuan card by 1536 units, a 33% advantage. Texture mapping units favor Lisuan by 48 units, a 33% advantage. Raster output units favor Lisuan by 48 units, a 100% advantage. These structural differences explain the Lisuan card's higher pixel and texture rates.

The NVIDIA card includes dedicated RT cores and tensor cores, which the Lisuan card lacks entirely. This indicates the NVIDIA card supports hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI tensor operations, while the Lisuan card does not list such capabilities.

FP16 compute reveals an architectural choice. The NVIDIA card operates FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, both at 23.70 TFLOPS. The Lisuan card operates FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, delivering 49.15 TFLOPS versus its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. This suggests the Lisuan architecture prioritizes half-precision throughput, potentially for compute workloads.

The NVIDIA card's RT cores and tensor cores, combined with its Blackwell 2.0 architecture, target modern graphics features including ray tracing and DLSS-style acceleration. The Lisuan card's TrueGPU architecture with higher raw throughput but no specialized cores suggests a different design philosophy focused on general compute and rasterization.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB wins in verified performance data. Its benchmark scores provide concrete evidence of capability across DirectX 9 through DirectX 12 and compute workloads. The PassMark G3D score of 21981 and GPU compute score of 11365 establish a measurable baseline. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4019 indicates modern DX12 gaming performance.

The NVIDIA card wins in memory bandwidth efficiency. Despite a narrower 128-bit bus, its GDDR7 memory achieves 448.0 GB/s, 16 GB/s higher than the Lisuan card's GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. This bandwidth advantage, combined with the smaller memory footprint, may benefit latency-sensitive workloads.

The NVIDIA card wins in feature completeness. It includes RT cores and tensor cores, supports PCIe 5.0, offers DisplayPort 2.1b outputs, and runs Vulkan 1.4. These features support modern graphics APIs and display technologies.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in memory capacity. Its 12 GB GDDR6 configuration provides 50% more memory than the NVIDIA card's 8 GB, which matters for large textures, high-resolution assets, and memory-intensive compute tasks.

The Lisuan card wins in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 figure of 24.58 TFLOPS exceeds the NVIDIA card by 0.88 TFLOPS. Its FP16 figure of 49.15 TFLOPS more than doubles the NVIDIA card's 23.70 TFLOPS, indicating significant half-precision compute advantage.

The Lisuan card wins in fill rate. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s exceeds the NVIDIA card's 123.5 GPixel/s by 55%. Its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s exceeds the NVIDIA card's 370.4 GTexel/s by 13.6 GTexel/s.

The Lisuan card also wins in shading unit count with 6144 versus 4608, and in ROP count with 96 versus 48. These structural advantages translate directly to its higher pixel and texture throughput figures.

The Lisuan card's larger physical footprint, higher TDP of 225 W, and 16-pin power connector suggest a card designed for sustained high-power operation, though no benchmark data confirms actual thermal or power behavior.

For ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, the NVIDIA card holds the advantage due to its dedicated RT and tensor cores. For pure compute and fill-rate-bound scenarios, the Lisuan card's specifications indicate an edge, pending benchmark verification.