NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 and Lisuan Tech LX MAX represent two very different approaches to GPU design, with the former built on NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture and the latter on Lisuan Tech's TrueGPU architecture. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 delivers significantly higher raw compute performance, but the LX MAX counters with a smaller physical footprint, lower power draw, and a more recent release date. The recorded data shows that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 holds a substantial advantage in shading, texture, and ray tracing capabilities, while the LX MAX offers a more compact dual-slot design and a higher position in the overall database percentile ranking. The LX MAX sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 sits at the 36th percentile, though this ranking reflects the absence of direct benchmark scores for the LX MAX rather than measured performance.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 wins in every category where direct performance metrics exist. Its FP32 compute reaches 44.10 TFLOPS compared to 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX MAX, which places it roughly 79% ahead in single-precision floating-point throughput. The texture rate of 689.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s gives the NVIDIA card an 80% advantage in texture processing, and the pixel rate of 250.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s represents a 30% lead in rasterization output. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 also has 8448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 66 RT cores, while the LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and no listed RT cores. For workloads that rely on FP32 compute, such as traditional rasterized gaming or general GPU compute tasks, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is clearly the stronger option based on the measured specifications.

The LX MAX wins on physical dimensions and power efficiency. It measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 measures 310 mm, 140 mm, and 61 mm respectively. The LX MAX also consumes 225 W of power versus 285 W for the NVIDIA card, and it requires a 550 W suggested PSU instead of 600 W. The LX MAX uses a dual-slot cooler, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 uses a triple-slot cooler, making the former easier to fit in smaller chassis. The LX MAX also provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 provides one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. For systems where physical space or power delivery is constrained, the LX MAX has a clear advantage.

Memory configuration favors the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 in capacity and bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 also has a higher memory clock at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the LX MAX, though the effective data rate is higher on the NVIDIA card due to the wider bus. The LX MAX does have a faster effective memory clock in terms of MHz, but the narrower bus limits its total bandwidth.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 uses the AD102 chip fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. The LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 achieves a transistor density of 125.3M per mm², while the LX MAX has no recorded density. The process node difference, 5 nm versus 6 nm, gives the NVIDIA chip a smaller feature size, which partially explains its higher transistor count and larger die area.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 includes 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads such as DLSS. The LX MAX has no listed RT cores or tensor cores, meaning neither ray tracing acceleration nor tensor-based AI acceleration is documented in the database. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. This places the NVIDIA card one Vulkan version ahead, which can matter for applications that use newer Vulkan extensions.

The FP16 performance differs in ratio. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 delivers 44.10 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio to FP32, meaning half-precision throughput equals single-precision throughput. The LX MAX delivers 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, meaning its FP16 throughput is double its FP32 throughput. Despite the LX MAX having a higher absolute FP16 number, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's 1:1 ratio suggests a more balanced architecture for mixed-precision workloads, while the LX MAX's 2:1 ratio indicates a design optimized for FP16-heavy tasks like certain machine learning inference workloads.

The production status differs as well. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is end-of-life, released on 2024-06-09, with a predecessor in GeForce 30 and a successor in GeForce 50. The LX MAX is active, released on 2026-03-16, with no recorded predecessor or successor. The LX MAX is also a newer product by roughly one year and nine months, which may explain its smaller process node advantage despite using a larger 6 nm node.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 delivers 44.10 TFLOPS FP32, while the LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. The NVIDIA card is approximately 79% ahead in single-precision compute.

Q: Does the LX MAX support ray tracing?

A: The database lists no RT cores for the LX MAX, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has 66 RT cores. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), but the LX MAX has no documented hardware ray tracing acceleration.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has 672.3 GB/s bandwidth from 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus. The LX MAX has 432.0 GB/s bandwidth from 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The NVIDIA card offers roughly 55% more bandwidth.

Q: Which card is physically smaller?

A: The LX MAX measures 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm and uses a dual-slot cooler. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 measures 310 mm by 140 mm by 61 mm and uses a triple-slot cooler. The LX MAX is shorter, lower, and thinner.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has a TDP of 285 W and a suggested PSU of 600 W. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W. Both use a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Which card has more display outputs?

A: The LX MAX provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 provides one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The LX MAX supports more simultaneous display connections via DisplayPort.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every measured specification. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 uses the AD102 chip on a 5 nm process with 76,300 million transistors and a 609 mm² die. The LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip on a 6 nm process with unknown transistor count and die size. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has a base clock of 2340 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz, while the LX MAX has no recorded base or boost clocks. The memory clock differs: 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) for the NVIDIA card versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the LX MAX.

Memory specifications differ in size, type, bus width, and bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The shading units are 8448 versus 6144, TMUs are 264 versus 192, and ROPs are 96 for both cards. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores, while the LX MAX has none listed. Pixel rate is 250.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 689.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

FP32 is 44.10 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1). TDP is 285 W versus 225 W, slot width is triple-slot versus dual-slot, and suggested PSU is 600 W versus 550 W. Both use a single 16-pin power connector and PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs differ: the NVIDIA card has one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a, while the LX MAX has four DisplayPort 1.4a. Vulkan support is 1.4 versus 1.3. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is end-of-life and released on 2024-06-09, while the LX MAX is active and released on 2026-03-16. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has a launch MSRP of 799 USD, while the LX MAX has no recorded launch MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark scores between these two cards. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has one recorded benchmark result: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5, with an average benchmark score of 6270. The LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the wins counter shows 0 for both cards. This means any performance comparison must rely on the specification-level differences rather than measured application results.

The nearest rivals for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 provide context for its performance tier. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER matches its average score of 6270 with a 0% delta. The AMD FirePro W600 scores 6223, which is 0.8% lower than the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 scores 6282, which is 0.2% higher, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327, which is 0.9% higher. These rivals bracket the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 within a narrow performance band, indicating that its measured 3DMark Steel Nomad score sits near parity with several other cards. The LX MAX has no nearest rivals listed, so no comparable performance anchors exist for it.

Using the specification data, the FP32 advantage for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is 44.10 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, a difference of 19.52 TFLOPS. The texture rate advantage is 689.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, a difference of 305 GTexel/s. The pixel rate advantage is 250.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, a difference of 58.6 GPixel/s. The memory bandwidth advantage is 672.3 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s, a difference of 240.3 GB/s. These are the largest performance deltas in favor of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102.

The LX MAX counters with a 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 figure versus 44.10 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA card, a difference of 5.05 TFLOPS in favor of the LX MAX. This is the only compute metric where the LX MAX leads. The LX MAX also has a lower TDP by 60 W and a smaller physical footprint, as detailed earlier. The FP16 advantage is notable for workloads that use half-precision arithmetic, such as certain neural network inference or image processing pipelines.

The Verdict

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is the stronger choice for any workload that depends on FP32 compute, texture processing, pixel throughput, or memory bandwidth. Its 44.10 TFLOPS FP32, 689.0 GTexel/s texture rate, 250.6 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth place it well ahead of the LX MAX in these core metrics. The presence of 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores adds hardware support for ray tracing and AI acceleration that the LX MAX lacks entirely. The 16 GB memory capacity is also 4 GB larger, which matters for high-resolution textures or large datasets.

The LX MAX is the better option for systems with limited space or power budgets. Its 225 W TDP, 550 W suggested PSU, dual-slot design, and compact dimensions (248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm) make it easier to integrate into smaller builds. Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS exceeds the NVIDIA card's 44.10 TFLOPS, which could benefit FP16-focused compute tasks. The LX MAX also has four DisplayPort outputs, which is one more than the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's three DisplayPort plus one HDMI configuration, and it supports Vulkan 1.3 rather than Vulkan 1.4.

The production status difference matters for long-term planning. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is end-of-life with a successor in GeForce 50, meaning it has a defined lifecycle. The LX MAX is active with no recorded successor, indicating ongoing availability. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has a launch MSRP of 799 USD, while the LX MAX has no recorded launch MSRP. The recorded data does not provide direct benchmark comparisons, so the performance gap is established through specification deltas rather than measured application scores. For users prioritizing raw compute and memory throughput, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is the clear winner. For users prioritizing power efficiency, physical size, or FP16 compute, the LX MAX offers distinct advantages.