NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain any head-to-head benchmark entries for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER versus the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. The headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty, and neither item records wins in direct comparison tests. This absence of paired measurements means no direct score differentials can be cited between the two cards.

What the database does provide is a full benchmark profile for the RTX 4070 SUPER and an empty benchmark array for the LX MAX. The RTX 4070 SUPER records an average benchmark score of 43223 across ten individual tests. Its strongest result appears in Geekbench Vulkan with 205624 points, followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 172795. In Passmark suites, the card scores 29995 in G3D, 17108 in GPU compute, 1184 in G2D, 344 in DirectX 9, 273 in DirectX 11, 167 in DirectX 10, and 110 in DirectX 12. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields 4627.

The LX MAX, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile versus all GPUs sits at 50, compared to the RTX 4070 SUPER's 83rd percentile. Without any measured results for the LX MAX, any head-to-head numeric comparison relies solely on the RTX 4070 SUPER's standalone performance and the architectural specifications of each card.

The RTX 4070 SUPER's nearest rivals in the database all sit within a narrow band of its average score. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB records 43262, a delta of -0.1 percent. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268, also -0.1 percent. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 posts 43301, a -0.2 percent delta, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile reaches 43667, placing 1 percent ahead. These figures show the RTX 4070 SUPER performing in a tightly clustered range, within 1 percent of four neighboring entries.

Where Each One Wins

For the RTX 4070 SUPER, the recorded data shows clear strengths across API-specific and compute workloads. The Passmark DirectX 9 score of 344 exceeds its DirectX 11 result of 273, its DirectX 10 score of 167, and its DirectX 12 result of 110. The Geekbench Vulkan result of 205624 outpaces the OpenCL score of 172795 by roughly 19 percent. The Passmark G3D score of 29995 dominates the G2D score of 1184, indicating the card's focus on 3D rendering over 2D operations. GPU compute via Passmark reaches 17108, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test records 4627.

The LX MAX has no benchmark wins recorded because no benchmark data exists for it. Its percentile of 50 places it at the median of all GPUs in the database, while the RTX 4070 SUPER sits at the 83rd percentile. In terms of raw compute specifications, the RTX 4070 SUPER delivers 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the LX MAX provides 24.58 TFLOPS. The RTX 4070 SUPER also leads in texture rate with 554.4 GTexel/s against 384.0 GTexel/s, and in memory bandwidth with 504.2 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s.

The LX MAX counters in pixel rate, where its 192.0 GPixel/s trails the RTX 4070 SUPER's 198.0 GPixel/s by a small margin, and in FP16 throughput, where the LX MAX reaches 49.15 TFLOPS compared to the RTX 4070 SUPER's 35.48 TFLOPS. The LX MAX also has more ROPs at 96 versus 80, and it supports four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs against the RTX 4070 SUPER's single HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a connectors.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 4070 SUPER uses the AD104 chip built on NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip under a TrueGPU architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

The RTX 4070 SUPER features 7168 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. It includes 56 ray tracing cores and 224 tensor cores. The LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but the database does not list ray tracing or tensor core counts for it. The LX MAX's FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS is exactly double its FP32 rate of 24.58 TFLOPS, indicating a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX 4070 SUPER's FP16 and FP32 figures are equal at 35.48 TFLOPS, a 1:1 ratio.

Memory configurations differ in type and speed. The RTX 4070 SUPER uses 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 1313 MHz, or 21 Gbps effective. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on the same 192-bit bus but with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 2250 MHz memory clock, or 18 Gbps effective. Both cards share a dual-slot design, a 1x 16-pin power connector, a 550 W suggested PSU, and a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

The RTX 4070 SUPER's base clock is 1980 MHz with a boost clock of 2475 MHz. The LX MAX has no base or boost clocks recorded in the database. The RTX 4070 SUPER draws 220 W, while the LX MAX is rated at 225 W. The RTX 4070 SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX MAX supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but Vulkan 1.3, one version behind.

Physical dimensions place the RTX 4070 SUPER at 267 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 42 mm in width. The LX MAX is shorter at 248 mm, but taller at 118 mm and wider at 48 mm. The RTX 4070 SUPER was released on 2024-01-16 and is marked end-of-life, with a predecessor in GeForce 30 and a successor in GeForce 50. The LX MAX has a release date of 2026-03-16, is currently active, and lists no predecessor or successor.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX 4070 SUPER than the LX MAX in FP32 compute?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER delivers 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the LX MAX provides 24.58 TFLOPS. This puts the RTX 4070 SUPER approximately 44 percent ahead in single-precision floating-point throughput.

Q: Which card has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth using GDDR6X memory, while the LX MAX has 432.0 GB/s using GDDR6. Both use a 192-bit bus and 12 GB of memory, but the RTX 4070 SUPER's faster memory type and 21 Gbps effective clock provide the advantage.

Q: Does the LX MAX have ray tracing or tensor cores?

A: The database does not list ray tracing core or tensor core counts for the LX MAX. The RTX 4070 SUPER has 56 ray tracing cores and 224 tensor cores in its Ada Lovelace architecture.

Q: What is the percentile ranking difference between these two cards?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER sits at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs in the database. The LX MAX is at the 50th percentile, meaning it falls at the median of all recorded GPUs.

Q: Which card supports a newer version of Vulkan?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each card?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 43223 across its recorded tests. The LX MAX has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark results are recorded for it in the database.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports the RTX 4070 SUPER as the stronger performer in most measured categories. Its 83rd percentile ranking versus all GPUs far exceeds the LX MAX's 50th percentile. The RTX 4070 SUPER leads in FP32 compute by roughly 44 percent, in texture rate by 170.4 GTexel/s, and in memory bandwidth by 72.2 GB/s. Its Vulkan 1.4 support and tensor and ray tracing cores add architectural capabilities the LX MAX does not list.

The LX MAX holds advantages in a narrower set of specifications. Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS exceeds the RTX 4070 SUPER's 35.48 TFLOPS by 38.5 percent, useful for workloads that leverage half-precision math. It has 16 more ROPs, a slightly higher pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s versus 198.0 GPixel/s (the RTX 4070 SUPER still holds a 6.0 GPixel/s lead), and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, one more video connection than the RTX 4070 SUPER's three DisplayPort plus one HDMI configuration. Its 225 W TDP is 5 W higher, and its shorter 248 mm length may fit tighter chassis constraints.

However, the LX MAX has no benchmark scores to verify its real-world performance. The database records no results for it, and its average score of 0 reflects this absence. The RTX 4070 SUPER provides a full suite of ten benchmark measurements, all of which fall within a performance band consistent with its nearest rivals, the Quadro M6000 family and RTX 5050 Mobile, all within 1 percent of each other. The RTX 4070 SUPER also has a launch MSRP of 599 USD, while the LX MAX has no launch MSRP recorded.

Users who need immediate, measured performance data, ray tracing, tensor acceleration, and higher FP32 throughput should select the RTX 4070 SUPER. Users who prioritize FP16 throughput, additional ROPs, or four DisplayPort outputs may consider the LX MAX, but its lack of recorded benchmarks means its actual performance remains unverified in the database. The production status also differs: the RTX 4070 SUPER is end-of-life, while the LX MAX is active with a 2026 release date, suggesting ongoing availability for the latter.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Lisuan Tech LX MAX |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | AD104 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | TrueGPU |

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 35,800 million | unknown |

| Die size | 294 mm² | unknown |

| Base clock | 1980 MHz | not recorded |

| Boost clock | 2475 MHz | not recorded |

| Memory clock | 1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |

| Memory bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 7168 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 224 | 192 |

| ROPs | 80 | 96 |

| RT cores | 56 | not recorded |

| Tensor cores | 224 | not recorded |

| Pixel rate | 198.0 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 554.4 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 35.48 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 35.48 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 220 W | 225 W |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 267 mm 10.5 inches | 248 mm 9.8 inches |

| Height | 112 mm 4.4 inches | 118 mm 4.6 inches |

| Width | 42 mm 1.7 inches | 48 mm 1.9 inches |

| Production status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release date | 2024-01-16 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 599 USD | not recorded |

| Average benchmark score | 43223 | 0 |

| Percentile vs all GPUs | 83 | 50 |