NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a single recorded benchmark for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893. This places the card at the 18th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores and an average benchmark score of zero, which complicates direct head-to-head comparisons. However, the RTX 4010's nearest rivals provide context for interpreting its performance level.

The RTX 4010 sits within a tight cluster of competitors. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB records an average score of 2907, which is 0.5% higher than the RTX 4010's 2893. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF averages 2910, a 0.6% advantage. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scores 2913, 0.7% higher. Even the NVIDIA Quadro P600, a much older professional card, edges out the RTX 4010 with an average of 2923, a 1% lead. These deltas are remarkably small, indicating that the RTX 4010 performs nearly identically to all four rivals in this particular test, with the largest gap being just 1%.

The LX MAX presents no comparable data. With no benchmarks, no average score, and no nearest rivals in the database, its performance cannot be quantified against the RTX 4010 or any other card. The RTX 4010 clearly holds the only measurable performance win, with a recorded score versus nothing for the LX MAX. Even though the LX MAX's theoretical specifications suggest far higher compute potential, the absence of benchmark data means the database cannot confirm any real-world performance advantage.

FAQ

Q: How does the RTX 4010 compare to its closest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 4010 scores 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Its nearest rivals all score within 1%: the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB at 2907 (0.5% higher), the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF at 2910 (0.6% higher), the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB at 2913 (0.7% higher), and the Quadro P600 at 2923 (1% higher). The RTX 4010 effectively matches all four.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX have any benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmarks for the LX MAX, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals. Its performance percentile is recorded as 50, but this is not derived from any actual test results.

Q: What memory specifications do the two cards have?

A: The RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is 4.5 times higher.

Q: What are the compute specifications for each card?

A: The RTX 4010 delivers 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 and 2.706 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio). The LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The LX MAX's FP32 throughput is approximately 9 times higher.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RTX 4010 has a 50 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 250 W, with no power connectors. The LX MAX has a 225 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 550 W, requiring one 16-pin connector.

Q: What interface and display outputs does each card use?

A: The RTX 4010 uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a. The LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and outputs 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 4010 uses the GA107 chip built on NVIDIA's Ampere architecture, manufactured by Samsung on an 8 nm process. The die measures 200 mm² and contains 8,700 million transistors, yielding a transistor density of 43.5 million per mm². The LX MAX uses a chip designated 7G106, built on an architecture called TrueGPU, manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The LX MAX's transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown in the database, so no density figure exists.

The RTX 4010 implements 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output pipelines. It also includes 6 ray tracing cores and 24 tensor cores, reflecting the Ampere architecture's dedicated hardware for these workloads. The LX MAX has no recorded ray tracing core or tensor core counts, which suggests either the architecture lacks these dedicated units or the database has no data on them. It does, however, have significantly more shading units at 6144, along with 192 TMUs and 96 ROPs.

The process node difference is notable: 8 nm Samsung versus 6 nm TSMC. The smaller node potentially allows the LX MAX to pack more compute into its unknown die size, though without transistor data, this remains speculative. The RTX 4010's Ampere architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX MAX's TrueGPU architecture also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but only Vulkan 1.3, one version older.

The RTX 4010 belongs to the GeForce 40-series, with its predecessor being GeForce 30 and its successor GeForce 50. The LX MAX belongs to the 7G100 generation, with no predecessor or successor recorded. The RTX 4010 was released on April 15, 2024, while the LX MAX has a release date of March 16, 2026, nearly two years later. Both cards are listed as Active in production status.

Specification Differences

The most striking difference is in memory. The RTX 4010 offers 4 GB GDDR6 with a 64-bit bus and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX offers 12 GB GDDR6 with a 192-bit bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX has triple the memory capacity and 4.5 times the bandwidth.

Compute resources diverge sharply. The RTX 4010 has 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, each exactly 8 times, 8 times, and 6 times higher respectively. Pixel rate scales accordingly: 28.19 GPixel/s for the RTX 4010 versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX MAX. Texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

FP32 throughput is 2.706 TFLOPS for the RTX 4010 versus 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX MAX, a 9-fold difference. FP16 throughput is 2.706 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio) for the RTX 4010 versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) for the LX MAX. The LX MAX's FP16 rate is 18 times higher, and the 2:1 ratio indicates it processes FP16 at twice the FP32 rate, whereas the RTX 4010 processes both at the same rate.

Clock speeds differ in availability. The RTX 4010 has a base clock of 1417 MHz and a boost clock of 1762 MHz. The LX MAX has no recorded base or boost clocks. Memory clock differs: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) for the RTX 4010 versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the LX MAX.

Power and physical specifications diverge. The RTX 4010 has a 50 W TDP, is single-slot, uses no power connectors, and suggests a 250 W PSU. The LX MAX has a 225 W TDP, is dual-slot, requires one 16-pin connector, and suggests a 550 W PSU. Dimensions: the RTX 4010 is 163 mm long and 69 mm high, while the LX MAX is 248 mm long, 118 mm high, and 48 mm wide. The LX MAX is substantially larger in every dimension.

Interface and outputs: the RTX 4010 uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a. The LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The wider PCIe interface on the LX MAX aligns with its higher bandwidth demands.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4010 wins in measurable performance. It has a recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893, placing it at the 18th percentile. The LX MAX has no recorded scores, so the RTX 4010 is the only card with verified benchmark data. The RTX 4010 also wins in efficiency-related metrics: its 50 W TDP is 4.5 times lower than the LX MAX's 225 W, and its suggested PSU of 250 W is less than half the LX MAX's 550 W. The RTX 4010's single-slot design and lack of power connectors make it a more compact, lower-power option. Its Vulkan 1.4 support is one version newer than the LX MAX's Vulkan 1.3.

The LX MAX wins in raw hardware specifications. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 is roughly 9 times the RTX 4010's 2.706 TFLOPS. Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS is 18 times higher. Memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s is 4.5 times higher, and capacity of 12 GB is 3 times higher. The LX MAX has 8 times the shading units and TMUs, and 6 times the ROPs. Its 192-bit bus is triple the width of the RTX 4010's 64-bit bus. The LX MAX also uses a smaller 6 nm TSMC process versus the 8 nm Samsung process, and its PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is double the width of the RTX 4010's x8.

The LX MAX's higher pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s indicate substantially higher fill rates. Its 2:1 FP16 ratio suggests the architecture is optimized for mixed-precision workloads, unlike the RTX 4010's 1:1 ratio. The LX MAX's 12 GB memory capacity provides more headroom for large datasets or textures, though no benchmark data confirms this advantage in practice.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split between verified performance and theoretical capability. The RTX 4010 is the only card with an actual benchmark score: 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it at the 18th percentile. This score places it within 1% of four rivals, including the RTX 4060 Ti variants and the Quadro P600, indicating it performs at a par with those cards in this specific test. For any user relying on measured results, the RTX 4010 is the only choice with evidence.

The LX MAX's absence of benchmark data means its impressive specifications remain unverified. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 12 GB memory would, if realized, place it far above the RTX 4010's capabilities. But the database records no test to confirm this. The percentile of 50 for the LX MAX appears to be a placeholder rather than a derived measurement, given the zero average score.

For users prioritizing verified, efficient, compact hardware, the RTX 4010 is the data-supported option. Its 50 W TDP, single-slot footprint, and no power connector requirement make it suitable for low-power systems. Its benchmark score confirms it performs comparably to mid-range cards like the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB, which scores 2913, just 0.7% higher.

For users prioritizing raw specifications and future potential, the LX MAX offers dramatically higher numbers across every compute metric. Its 6 nm process, 6144 shading units, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth indicate a design aimed at high-throughput workloads. However, the total absence of benchmark results means the database cannot confirm whether these specifications translate into real-world performance. The LX MAX also carries higher power requirements: 225 W TDP and a 550 W suggested PSU, making it a more demanding installation.

The verdict from the data alone: the RTX 4010 wins on evidence and efficiency; the LX MAX wins on paper specifications. Without benchmark data for the LX MAX, the RTX 4010 remains the only card with proven performance in the database. Users who require measured results should choose the RTX 4010. Users who trust unverified specifications and need maximum compute throughput might consider the LX MAX, but the database offers no data to support that choice.