NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither product has a recorded win count. This absence of comparative testing data means the analysis must rely on the specifications and the standalone benchmark scores available for the NVIDIA part.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile, the database contains eight benchmark results. The strongest result is in Passmark G3D, where it scores 11,664 points. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 52,998. Compute performance via Passmark GPU Compute reaches 4,419. Legacy DirectX tests show a Passmark DirectX 9 score of 152, DirectX 10 at 61, DirectX 11 at 94, and DirectX 12 at 55. The 2D graphics test scores 526.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and the percentile versus all GPUs is 50. The NVIDIA part sits at the 44th percentile versus all GPUs. This places the RTX 3050 A Mobile slightly below the midpoint of the database, while the LX MAX has a nominal percentile that is not supported by any actual test data.

The average benchmark score for the NVIDIA part is 8,746. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 with an average score of 8,743 and a delta of 0 percent, the NVIDIA Quadro P2200 at 8,686 with a 0.7 percent higher score for the RTX 3050 A Mobile, the AMD Radeon R9 M265X at 8,851 with the RTX part trailing by 1.2 percent, and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 at 8,863 with a 1.3 percent deficit. These deltas show the RTX 3050 A Mobile sits in a tight cluster, within roughly 2 percent of its nearest competitors.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile demonstrates capability across multiple benchmark categories, but the data shows no specific wins against the Lisuan Tech LX MAX because no comparative tests exist. The LX MAX has zero benchmark entries, meaning the database records no performance victories for either product in a head-to-head context.

Looking at the NVIDIA part alone, the Passmark G3D score of 11,664 indicates strength in general 3D rendering workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 52,998 suggests solid compute throughput for OpenCL-based applications. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 4,419 provides a separate measure of compute performance that is lower than the OpenCL result, reflecting differences in test methodology. The DirectX 9 score of 152 is the highest among the legacy DirectX tests, while DirectX 12 shows the lowest at 55, which is notable given the architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX cannot be assigned wins in any category because the database contains no benchmark data for it. Its specifications suggest capabilities, but without measured results, no performance claims can be substantiated. The recorded percentile of 50 appears to be a placeholder rather than a derived statistic.

For use-case analysis, the RTX 3050 A Mobile shows a profile suited to older DirectX titles based on the DirectX 9 score of 152 being roughly 2.5 times the DirectX 11 score of 94 and nearly 2.8 times the DirectX 12 score of 55. The compute scores indicate the part can handle general-purpose GPU workloads, though the delta between OpenCL and Passmark GPU Compute suggests variance depending on the workload type.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile uses the GA106 chip built on the Ampere architecture. It is fabricated on an 8 nm process at Samsung with 12,000 million transistors on a die size of 276 mm², yielding a transistor density of 43.5 million per mm². The chip belongs to the GeForce 30 Mobile generation and the GeForce 30-series family. Its production status is end-of-life, and it was released in late 2023.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses a chip designated 7G106, built on an architecture called TrueGPU. This is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown, with no transistor density figure. The generation is listed as 7G100. Its production status is active, with a release date in 2026.

The NVIDIA part has 1,792 shading units, 56 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation pipelines. It includes 14 ray tracing cores and 56 tensor cores. The LX MAX has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation pipelines. The LX MAX has no recorded ray tracing core or tensor core counts, meaning those features are either absent or unverified.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The RTX 3050 A Mobile has a base clock of 1,065 MHz and a boost clock of 1,343 MHz. The LX MAX has no recorded base or boost clocks. Memory clocks show 1,500 MHz for the NVIDIA part with 12 Gbps effective, while the LX MAX runs at 2,250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory configurations diverge markedly. The RTX 3050 A Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. This gives the LX MAX 2.25 times the memory bandwidth and three times the capacity.

Pixel and texture rates follow the memory split. The NVIDIA part delivers 42.98 GPixel/s and 75.21 GTexel/s. The LX MAX delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s, which are roughly 4.5 times and 5.1 times higher respectively. Floating point performance shows FP32 at 4.813 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA part and 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX MAX. FP16 is 4.813 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio for NVIDIA and 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio for the LX MAX.

Power and physical characteristics differ. The RTX 3050 A Mobile has a TDP of 45 W, an IGP slot width, and no power connectors. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W, a dual-slot width, and a single 16-pin power connector with a suggested 550 W PSU. The LX MAX measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The NVIDIA part has no recorded dimensions.

Bus interfaces differ: PCIe 4.0 x8 for NVIDIA versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX MAX. Display outputs are portable device dependent for the NVIDIA part, while the LX MAX has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL 4.6. Vulkan support is 1.4 for NVIDIA and 1.3 for the LX MAX.

The Verdict

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results, so a direct performance verdict cannot be derived from comparative testing. The only measured scores belong to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile. Its average benchmark score of 8,746 places it at the 44th percentile, with nearest rivals within roughly 2 percent. The LX MAX has no recorded benchmarks, making its average score 0 and its percentile nominal at 50.

For users selecting based on measured data, the RTX 3050 A Mobile is the only option with verified performance. Its scores show a part that handles legacy DirectX 9 workloads better than newer APIs, with a DirectX 9 score of 152 versus 55 for DirectX 12. Compute performance is moderate, with OpenCL at 52,998 and Passmark GPU Compute at 4,419.

The LX MAX offers specifications that are numerically superior on paper. The data shows 12 GB of memory versus 4 GB, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 192.0 GB/s, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 4.813 TFLOPS, and more shading units, texture mapping units, and raster operation pipelines. However, these specifications are not validated by any benchmark scores in the database. The 225 W TDP and dual-slot cooler with a 16-pin connector indicate a desktop-class part, while the NVIDIA part is an IGP with a 45 W TDP.

The architecture comparison shows different design philosophies. The NVIDIA part uses a mature Ampere architecture with tensor cores and ray tracing cores, both absent from the LX MAX record. The LX MAX uses a newer 6 nm process versus 8 nm, and it has a 2:1 FP16 ratio indicating dedicated FP16 throughput, while the NVIDIA part runs FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32.

The verdict from the data is straightforward. The RTX 3050 A Mobile is a verified, measured product with known performance characteristics. The LX MAX is a specification sheet without test results. Users requiring confirmed benchmark data should rely on the NVIDIA part. Users considering the LX MAX have no recorded performance evidence to evaluate, only specifications that suggest higher capability in memory capacity, bandwidth, and compute throughput. The production status of the LX MAX is active with a 2026 release date, while the RTX 3050 A Mobile is end-of-life.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each product?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile has an average benchmark score of 8,746. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has an average benchmark score of 0, indicating no recorded benchmarks.

Q: Which product has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How does the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 3050 A Mobile is within roughly 2 percent of its nearest rivals. It is 0.7 percent ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro P2200, 1.2 percent behind the AMD Radeon R9 M265X, and 1.3 percent behind the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100. It matches the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 at a 0 percent delta.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX have any benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the LX MAX, and its average benchmark score is 0.

Q: What are the FP32 performance figures for each product?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile delivers 4.813 TFLOPS FP32. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile has a 45 W TDP with no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a 225 W TDP with a single 16-pin power connector and a suggested 550 W PSU.