NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison because the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no individual benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and there are no entries for 3DMark or Passmark tests. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, by contrast, has a full set of measurements across eight tests. This means every head-to-head comparison relies on the RTX 3050's recorded results against the LX MAX's absence of data, plus the broader percentile and rival positioning for each.

The RTX 3050 6 GB posts a Passmark G3D score of 10738, a Passmark GPU Compute score of 5192, and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1515. Its Passmark DirectX 9 score is 124, DirectX 11 is 72, DirectX 12 is 53, and DirectX 10 is 59. The 2D graphics score sits at 882. These numbers place the RTX 3050 at the 15th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 2329.

The LX MAX shows no benchmark results, so its percentile of 50 is derived from its specifications rather than measured performance. The database lists its average score as 0, which effectively means no direct performance comparison can be made from recorded tests. The nearest rivals for the RTX 3050 offer context: the GeForce GT 640M scores 2335 on average, which is 0.3% higher than the RTX 3050's 2329. The Quadro P620 averages 2339, 0.4% higher. The Intel HD Graphics 510 averages 2305, which is 1% lower. The GeForce GT 550M averages 2363, 1.4% higher. These deltas are all within a narrow band, indicating the RTX 3050 6 GB sits in a cluster of older or lower-end parts despite its modern architecture.

For the LX MAX, the lack of benchmarks means its wins cannot be quantified with exact numbers. The only recorded win is in specification-based metrics, not in measured frame rates or scores. The RTX 3050 wins every benchmark category by default because it has data and the LX MAX does not. The database shows winsA as 0 and winsB as 0, which reflects that no head-to-head benchmark entries exist. The practical interpretation is that the RTX 3050 is the only part with verified performance data, while the LX MAX's capabilities remain unmeasured.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 3050 6 GB wins in all measured benchmarks because it is the only one with recorded scores. Its Passmark G3D score of 10738 indicates it can handle DirectX 11 workloads reasonably, while its Passmark DirectX 9 score of 124 shows strong legacy API performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1515 provides a modern workload reference. The GPU compute score of 5192 suggests general compute tasks are within its reach, though the 15th percentile ranking places it below most contemporary GPUs.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in specification-driven categories. It has 12 GB of memory versus 6 GB, a 192-bit bus versus 96-bit, and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth versus 168.0 GB/s. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is roughly 3.6 times the RTX 3050's 6.774 TFLOPS. The LX MAX also has 6144 shading units versus 2304, 192 texture mapping units versus 72, and 96 render output units versus 32. These numbers suggest the LX MAX should dominate in compute-heavy and high-resolution workloads if its architecture performs as specified, but the database contains no verification.

The RTX 3050 wins in compatibility and ecosystem terms. It uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The RTX 3050 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The RTX 3050 has 18 ray tracing cores and 72 tensor cores, features the LX MAX does not list. The RTX 3050 also has a lower TDP of 70 W versus 225 W, and it requires no external power connectors, while the LX MAX needs a 16-pin connector.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 3050 6 GB uses the GA107 chip built on Samsung's 8 nm process. The die measures 200 mm² and contains 8,700 million transistors, giving a density of 43.5 million per square millimeter. The LX MAX uses a 7G106 chip fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm node. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so no density comparison is possible.

The RTX 3050's architecture is Ampere, which is a generation behind the current GeForce 40 series. The LX MAX uses an architecture called TrueGPU, part of the 7G100 generation. The RTX 3050 has a base clock of 1042 MHz and a boost clock of 1470 MHz. The LX MAX has no base or boost clock listed. Memory clocks differ: the RTX 3050 runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective, while the LX MAX runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

The RTX 3050 has 2304 shading units, 72 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 18 RT cores, and 72 tensor cores. The LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no RT cores or tensor cores are listed. The pixel rate for the RTX 3050 is 47.04 GPixel/s, while the LX MAX achieves 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rates are 105.8 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP16 performance on the RTX 3050 matches FP32 at 6.774 TFLOPS, while the LX MAX reaches 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, double its FP32.

The RTX 3050 uses a 96-bit memory bus with 6 GB of GDDR6. The LX MAX uses a 192-bit bus with 12 GB of GDDR6. The RTX 3050 has a 70 W TDP and draws power from the PCIe slot only. The LX MAX has a 225 W TDP and requires a 16-pin power connector. The RTX 3050 is dual-slot, 242 mm long, and 112 mm tall. The LX MAX is dual-slot, 248 mm long, 118 mm tall, and 48 mm wide. The RTX 3050 offers one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The LX MAX offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs only.

FAQ

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmarks for the LX MAX, and its average benchmark score is 0. The RTX 3050 6 GB has eight recorded scores across 3DMark and Passmark tests.

Q: How does the RTX 3050 6 GB compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 3050's average score of 2329 is 0.3% lower than the GeForce GT 640M (2335), 0.4% lower than the Quadro P620 (2339), 1% higher than the Intel HD Graphics 510 (2305), and 1.4% lower than the GeForce GT 550M (2363).

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two cards?

A: The LX MAX has 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth from its 192-bit bus and 12 GB of GDDR6. The RTX 3050 has 168.0 GB/s from a 96-bit bus and 6 GB of GDDR6. The LX MAX offers 2.57 times the bandwidth.

Q: Which card has higher compute throughput?

A: The LX MAX lists 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16. The RTX 3050 lists 6.774 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16. The LX MAX has roughly 3.6 times the FP32 throughput.

Q: Do both cards support the same API versions?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 3050 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. The RTX 3050 also has RT cores and tensor cores, which the LX MAX does not list.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RTX 3050 has a 70 W TDP, uses no external power connectors, and requires a 250 W power supply. The LX MAX has a 225 W TDP, uses one 16-pin connector, and requires a 550 W power supply.

Specification Differences

| Field | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB | Lisuan Tech LX MAX |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GA107 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | Ampere | TrueGPU |

| Generation | GeForce 30 | 7G100 |

| Process node | 8 nm (Samsung) | 6 nm (TSMC) |

| Transistors | 8,700 million | unknown |

| Die size | 200 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor density | 43.5M / mm² | null |

| Base clock | 1042 MHz | null |

| Boost clock | 1470 MHz | null |

| Memory clock | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 6 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Bus width | 96 bit | 192 bit |

| Bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 2304 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 72 | 192 |

| ROPs | 32 | 96 |

| RT cores | 18 | null |

| Tensor cores | 72 | null |

| Pixel rate | 47.04 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 105.8 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 6.774 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 6.774 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 70 W | 225 W |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 242 mm | 248 mm |

| Height | 112 mm | 118 mm |

| Width | null | 48 mm |

| Production status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release date | 2024-02-01 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 179 USD | null |

| Percentile | 15 | 50 |

| Average benchmark score | 2329 | 0 |

| Benchmark entries | 8 | 0 |