Intel Arc A310E vs NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC Comparison

The Intel Arc A310E and the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC occupy entirely different segments of the GPU market, and the recorded data reflects this divide clearly. The Arc A310E is a low-power, compact graphics card designed for embedded and entry-level applications, while the B300 SXM6 AC is a massive server accelerator built for high-performance computing. Benchmark results, where available, show the B300 SXM6 AC delivers an extreme performance advantage, but the Arc A310E offers unique features in a small form factor that the server module lacks.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC wins decisively in raw compute performance. Its single recorded benchmark result, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 369,831, places it in the 100th percentile of all GPUs in the database. This score is 7% higher than the NVIDIA B200's average score of 345,482, 10.4% higher than the NVIDIA H200 NVL's 334,891, 16.3% higher than the AMD Instinct MI300X's 317,994, and 25% higher than the NVIDIA L40S's 295,763. The B300 SXM6 AC is the top performer in its class, and its shading unit count of 18,944, texture mapping units of 592, and FP32 compute of 76.99 TFLOPS confirm its dominance in tasks that require massive parallel processing.

The Intel Arc A310E, by contrast, has no benchmark scores recorded in the database, and its percentile rank of 50 indicates it sits in the middle of the performance distribution. However, it wins in areas beyond raw speed. The Arc A310E is a single-slot card measuring 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width, making it suitable for compact systems. It consumes 75 W of power and requires no external power connectors, with a suggested power supply of only 250 W. It also provides four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, enabling multi-display setups, while the B300 SXM6 AC has no display outputs at all. The Arc A310E supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, whereas the B300 SXM6 AC lists N/A for all three graphics APIs, indicating it is not intended for traditional graphics workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC has a recorded Geekbench OpenCL score of 369,831, placing it in the 100th percentile. The Intel Arc A310E has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: How does the B300 SXM6 AC compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC is 7% ahead of the NVIDIA B200, 10.4% ahead of the NVIDIA H200 NVL, 16.3% ahead of the AMD Instinct MI300X, and 25% ahead of the NVIDIA L40S in average benchmark scores.

Q: What are the memory specifications of each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A310E has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC has 288 GB of HBM3e memory on an 8192-bit bus with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: Do both GPUs support display outputs?

A: No. The Intel Arc A310E has four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC has no display outputs.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Intel Arc A310E has a TDP of 75 W and a suggested power supply of 250 W. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC has a TDP of 1100 W and a suggested power supply of 1500 W.

Q: Are both GPUs currently in production?

A: The Intel Arc A310E is listed as end-of-life, while the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC is listed as active.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark comparison between the Intel Arc A310E and the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC is minimal, as the database contains no direct comparative test results. However, the available data for the B300 SXM6 AC provides a clear picture of its performance tier. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 369,831 is the only recorded benchmark for this GPU, and it demonstrates a substantial lead over its nearest rivals. The B300 SXM6 AC outperforms the NVIDIA B200 by 7%, the NVIDIA H200 NVL by 10.4%, the AMD Instinct MI300X by 16.3%, and the NVIDIA L40S by 25%. These deltas show that the B300 SXM6 AC is not just marginally faster but sits at the top of the server accelerator hierarchy.

The Intel Arc A310E has no benchmark entries, so its performance cannot be quantified against the B300 SXM6 AC or any other GPU in the database. Its percentile rank of 50 suggests average performance relative to all GPUs, but this is not backed by any specific score. The absence of head-to-head benchmarks means the comparison rests on architectural and specification differences rather than direct measurements. The B300 SXM6 AC's FP32 throughput of 76.99 TFLOPS dwarfs the Arc A310E's 3.072 TFLOPS, a 25x difference in raw compute capability. Texture rate differences are similarly stark, with the B300 SXM6 AC delivering 1,202.9 GTexel/s versus the Arc A310E's 64.00 GTexel/s.

Specification Differences

The specification gap between these two GPUs is enormous. The Intel Arc A310E uses 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units, while the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC uses 18,944 shading units, 592 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units. The Arc A310E has 6 ray tracing cores, whereas the B300 SXM6 AC lists no ray tracing cores but includes 592 tensor cores. The Arc A310E has no tensor cores.

Memory configurations differ fundamentally. The Arc A310E has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. The B300 SXM6 AC has 288 GB of HBM3e on an 8192-bit bus with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth. Clock speeds also diverge: the Arc A310E runs at a base and boost clock of 2000 MHz, while the B300 SXM6 AC has a base clock of 1665 MHz and a boost clock of 2032 MHz. Memory clocks are 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective) for the Arc A310E and 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) for the B300 SXM6 AC.

Physical and power specifications are equally divergent. The Arc A310E is a single-slot card with no power connectors and a TDP of 75 W. The B300 SXM6 AC is an SXM module with a TDP of 1100 W and a suggested power supply of 1500 W. The bus interfaces differ as well: PCIe 4.0 x8 for the Arc A310E and PCIe 6.0 x16 for the B300 SXM6 AC. The Arc A310E measures 168 mm by 69 mm by 20 mm, while the B300 SXM6 AC has no recorded dimensions. The Arc A310E offers four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, while the B300 SXM6 AC has none.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on different architectures and manufacturing processes. The Intel Arc A310E uses the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, part of the Alchemist (Arc 3) generation. It is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC uses the Blackwell Ultra architecture with the GB110 chip, part of the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation. It is also fabricated by TSMC, but on a 5 nm process, with 208,000 million transistors on a 1,628 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 127.8 million per mm².

The transistor count difference is dramatic: the B300 SXM6 AC has nearly 29 times more transistors than the Arc A310E. The die size is over 10 times larger, and the transistor density is nearly 3 times higher. These architectural differences reflect the intended workloads. The Arc A310E supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it suitable for graphics rendering. The B300 SXM6 AC lists N/A for all graphics APIs, indicating its focus on compute tasks rather than traditional graphics. The Arc A310E has a predecessor of Xe Graphics and a successor of Battlemage, while the B300 SXM6 AC has a predecessor of Server Hopper and a successor of Server Rubin.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC is the clear choice for workloads requiring maximum compute throughput. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 369,831 places it in the 100th percentile, and its performance advantage over the nearest rivals is consistent, ranging from 7% over the NVIDIA B200 to 25% over the NVIDIA L40S. The 288 GB of HBM3e memory with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth and 76.99 TFLOPS of FP32 performance make it suitable for large-scale AI, scientific simulation, and data center compute tasks. Its active production status and 5 nm process with 208,000 million transistors indicate a current, high-end server product.

The Intel Arc A310E serves a different purpose entirely. With no benchmark scores recorded, its performance is unquantified, but its specifications suggest it targets embedded systems, basic graphics output, and low-power applications. The 75 W TDP, single-slot form factor, and four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs make it suitable for compact systems that need multi-display capability without high power draw. Its support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 enables modern graphics workloads, which the B300 SXM6 AC cannot handle due to its lack of display outputs and N/A graphics API support. The Arc A310E is end-of-life, indicating it is a legacy product, while the B300 SXM6 AC is active. Users needing a server accelerator for compute-heavy tasks should select the B300 SXM6 AC, while those needing a low-power graphics card with display outputs should consider the Arc A310E.