NVIDIA B200 SXM6 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

NVIDIA B200 SXM6 and Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 occupy opposite poles of the GPU market, yet both are listed as active production parts in the database. The B200 is a server-class accelerator with a 1000 W TDP, while the LX 7G100 is a dual-slot graphics card with a 225 W TDP. Their benchmark results are not recorded, so the analysis below draws exclusively on the architectural and specification data available.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two parts, and neither has a recorded average benchmark score. Both sit at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, but this percentile is based on zero measured results, so it offers no comparative signal. Without benchmark outcomes, the comparison must be built from derived performance metrics.

The B200 delivers 69.34 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the LX 7G100 provides 24.58 TFLOPS. That gives the B200 a 2.82x advantage in single-precision floating-point throughput. In FP16, the B200 again posts 69.34 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), whereas the LX 7G100 reaches 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The B200 leads by 1.41x in half-precision work, but the LX 7G100 narrows the gap because its FP16 rate is double its FP32 rate, while the B200 runs FP16 at the same rate as FP32.

Pixel throughput tells a different story. The LX 7G100 achieves 192.0 GPixel/s, which is 4.37x higher than the B200’s 43.92 GPixel/s. The B200’s low pixel rate is tied to its 24 ROPs, while the LX 7G100 has 96 ROPs. Texture rate favors the B200, however, with 1,083.4 GTexel/s against 384.0 GTexel/s, a 2.82x lead. This pattern suggests the B200 is optimized for compute-heavy workloads with dense texture sampling, while the LX 7G100 is built for rasterization-heavy graphics where pixel output matters more.

Memory bandwidth is overwhelmingly in the B200’s favor. The B200 has 180 GB of HBM3e on a 8192-bit bus, yielding 8.19 TB/s. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s. The B200’s bandwidth is 18.96x higher, a margin that dwarfs the compute differences. For memory-bound operations, such as large neural network weight reads or high-resolution texture streaming, the B200 will sustain far higher throughput.

Clock speeds are not directly comparable because the B200 lists a base clock of 120 MHz and a boost of 1830 MHz, while the LX 7G100 has no base or boost values recorded. The LX 7G100’s memory clock is listed as 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while the B200’s memory clock is 2000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective. The LX 7G100’s higher effective memory clock per pin does not compensate for the B200’s massive bus width advantage.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute?

A: The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 delivers 69.34 TFLOPS of FP32, which is 2.82x the 24.58 TFLOPS from the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100.

Q: How do the memory capacities compare?

A: The B200 has 180 GB of HBM3e, while the LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6. The B200’s capacity is 15x larger.

Q: Which card has higher pixel fill rate?

A: The LX 7G100 achieves 192.0 GPixel/s, which is 4.37x higher than the B200’s 43.92 GPixel/s. This comes from the LX 7G100’s 96 ROPs versus the B200’s 24 ROPs.

Q: What API support does each GPU provide?

A: The B200 lists no API support, with DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan all marked as N/A. The LX 7G100 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The B200 has a TDP of 1000 W and a suggested PSU of 1400 W. The LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: What is the physical form factor of each?

A: The B200 is an SXM Module, while the LX 7G100 is a Dual-slot card measuring 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width.

Architecture Differences

The B200 uses the GB100 chip built on the Blackwell architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has 208,000 million transistors on a 1628 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 127.8 million per mm². The LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip built on the TrueGPU architecture, also fabricated at TSMC but on a 6 nm process. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so no density figure exists.

The B200 belongs to the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation and has a predecessor in Server Hopper and a successor in Server Rubin. The LX 7G100 belongs to the 7G100 generation, with no predecessor or successor recorded. The B200’s architecture is designed around tensor cores, with 592 tensor cores present. The LX 7G100 has no tensor cores recorded, which indicates a fundamental difference in compute focus.

Shading units also differ. The B200 has 18,944 shading units, while the LX 7G100 has 6,144, a 3.08x difference. Texture mapping units are 592 on the B200 versus 192 on the LX 7G100, a 3.08x difference that matches the shading unit ratio. ROPs are reversed: the B200 has only 24, while the LX 7G100 has 96, a 4x advantage for the latter.

The B200’s FP16 to FP32 ratio is 1:1, meaning it processes both formats at the same rate. The LX 7G100 has a 2:1 ratio, meaning its FP16 throughput is double its FP32 throughput. This makes the LX 7G100 relatively more efficient at half-precision tasks compared to its own single-precision performance, though the B200 still wins in absolute FP16 output.

The B200 has no display outputs, while the LX 7G100 has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The B200 also lacks any API support for DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan, while the LX 7G100 supports all three. This confirms the B200 is a compute-only accelerator, whereas the LX 7G100 is a graphics-oriented card with display and API capabilities.

Specification Differences

The table below lists only the fields where the two GPUs differ. Fields with identical or unknown values are omitted.

| Field | NVIDIA B200 SXM6 | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GB100 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | Blackwell | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Server Blackwell (Bxx) | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 208,000 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 1628 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 127.8M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 120 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 1830 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | 2000 MHz 8 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 180 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | HBM3e | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 8192 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 8.19 TB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 18944 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 592 | 192 |

| ROPs | 24 | 96 |

| Tensor Cores | 592 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 43.92 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 1,083.4 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 69.34 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 69.34 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 1000 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | SXM Module | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | null | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 1400 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 6.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | N/A | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL | N/A | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |

| Length | null | 294 mm 11.6 inches |

| Height | null | 120 mm 4.7 inches |

| Width | null | 49 mm 1.9 inches |

| Release Date | 2024-10-31 | 2026-06-17 |

| Predecessor | Server Hopper | null |

| Successor | Server Rubin | null |

| Launch MSRP | 34,999 USD | null |

Where Each One Wins

The B200 wins decisively in compute density and memory capacity. Its FP32 rate of 69.34 TFLOPS is nearly three times the LX 7G100’s 24.58 TFLOPS, and its FP16 output of 69.34 TFLOPS exceeds the LX 7G100’s 49.15 TFLOPS. The 180 GB HBM3e frame buffer with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth is in a different class from the 12 GB GDDR6 with 432.0 GB/s. Any workload that requires loading large models or datasets into memory will favor the B200, as will any task that stresses floating-point math, such as scientific simulation or AI training.

The B200 also has a wider bus interface (PCIe 6.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16), which allows faster host-to-device transfers in systems that support it. Its texture rate of 1,083.4 GTexel/s is 2.82x higher, making it stronger for texture-heavy compute workloads.

The LX 7G100 wins in graphics-oriented metrics. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is 4.37x higher, driven by 96 ROPs. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, while the B200 has no API support. The LX 7G100 has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, so it can drive displays directly, which the B200 cannot. Its lower TDP of 225 W and suggested PSU of 550 W make it far easier to install in a conventional desktop system, whereas the B200 requires a 1000 W TDP and a 1400 W suggested PSU.

The LX 7G100’s FP16 rate of 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio shows that its architecture is tuned for half-precision graphics or compute tasks, even if the absolute number is lower. Its 192-bit memory bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest, but sufficient for its 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer.

The Verdict

The data indicates two distinct usage scenarios. The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 is for server environments where maximum FP32/FP16 throughput and enormous memory capacity are required. Its 69.34 TFLOPS in both precisions, 180 GB memory, and 8.19 TB/s bandwidth place it far ahead of the LX 7G100 in any memory-bound or compute-bound workload. The absence of display outputs and graphics APIs means it cannot function as a traditional graphics card. Its launch MSRP is 34,999 USD, and it targets the Server Blackwell generation with a successor already planned.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is for desktop graphics and workstation use where rasterization, display output, and API compatibility matter. Its 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate, 96 ROPs, and DirectX 12 Ultimate support make it suitable for rendering to screens, while its 225 W TDP fits standard power supplies. Its FP32 of 24.58 TFLOPS and FP16 of 49.15 TFLOPS are respectable for a 6 nm part, but they are not competitive with the B200 in raw compute.

Users who need to train large neural networks, process massive datasets, or run scientific simulations should choose the B200, as its 15x memory capacity and 18.96x bandwidth are decisive. Users who need a functional graphics card with display outputs, API support, and reasonable power draw should choose the LX 7G100, as the B200 literally cannot output video. The two products do not overlap in functionality, and the benchmark data, while empty, reinforces that these are complementary rather than competing devices.