AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs NVIDIA B200 SXM6 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no overlapping benchmark results for the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT and the NVIDIA B200 SXM6. The RX 7600 XT has recorded scores across ten tests, including 3DMark Steel Nomad (2348), Geekbench OpenCL (92426), Geekbench Vulkan (48366), and Passmark GPU Compute (8987). The B200 SXM6 has no recorded benchmark entries, so a direct numerical comparison is not possible from the recorded data. The RX 7600 XT's average benchmark score is 17083, placing it at the 60th percentile among all GPUs. The B200 SXM6 holds a 50th percentile ranking, though this is based on zero recorded measurements, making the percentile a placeholder rather than a measured result.

The RX 7600 XT's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its performance tier. It sits 0.3% above the GeForce GTX 690 (average score 17037), 0.4% above the Radeon HD 7970M (17019), and 0.9% above the Tesla M4 (16932). The closest competitor is the GeForce RTX 3070, which leads by 0.7% with an average score of 17208. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating the RX 7600 XT occupies a tightly contested performance band. The B200 SXM6 has no nearest rivals listed, so no similar comparative analysis can be drawn for it.

Because the head-to-head benchmark array is empty, the data does not support any direct win claims for either card. The RX 7600 XT delivers measurable results in consumer-oriented tests, while the B200 SXM6 shows no recorded performance data in the database. The absence of shared tests means the two products cannot be ranked against each other on any specific workload using the available measurements.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT?

A: The RX 7600 XT records an average benchmark score of 17083 across its ten tests, placing it at the 60th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Does the NVIDIA B200 SXM6 have any benchmark results in the database?

A: No. The B200 SXM6 has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed. Its 50th percentile ranking is not derived from measured performance data.

Q: How does the RX 7600 XT compare to the GeForce RTX 3070 in average score?

A: The RTX 3070 leads with an average score of 17208, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 7600 XT's 17083. This is the closest competitor in the recorded rivals list.

Q: What is the transistor count difference between the two cards?

A: The RX 7600 XT uses 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, while the B200 SXM6 uses 208,000 million transistors on a 1628 mm² die. The B200 SXM6 has a transistor density of 127.8M per mm² versus 65.2M per mm² for the RX 7600 XT.

Q: What memory configurations do the two cards use?

A: The RX 7600 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The B200 SXM6 has 180 GB of HBM3e on an 8192-bit bus with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The RX 7600 XT boosts to 2755 MHz with a base clock of 1980 MHz. The B200 SXM6 has a boost clock of 1830 MHz and a base clock of 120 MHz.

The Verdict

The data supports no verdict for the NVIDIA B200 SXM6 in any performance comparison, as the database contains zero measurements for it. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, by contrast, has ten recorded scores and a clear position among its nearest rivals. The RX 7600 XT is a functional consumer GPU with measurable results, while the B200 SXM6 exists only as a specification entry.

For users selecting based on recorded data, the RX 7600 XT is the only option with demonstrated performance. It sits within 1% of several competing GPUs, including the RTX 3070, GTX 690, HD 7970M, and Tesla M4. The B200 SXM6 cannot be recommended or rejected on any measured basis; it simply lacks the evidence. The two products serve different segments, but the database only supports analysis for one of them.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every recorded specification. The RX 7600 XT uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC, while the B200 SXM6 uses a 5 nm node. Transistor counts are dramatically different: 13,300 million versus 208,000 million. Die sizes are 204 mm² versus 1628 mm². The RX 7600 XT has a 128-bit memory bus with 16 GB GDDR6, while the B200 SXM6 has an 8192-bit bus with 180 GB HBM3e. Memory bandwidth is 288.0 GB/s versus 8.19 TB/s.

Clock speeds also diverge sharply. The RX 7600 XT has a base clock of 1980 MHz and a boost of 2755 MHz; the B200 SXM6 has a base of 120 MHz and a boost of 1830 MHz. Shading units number 2048 on the RX 7600 XT versus 18944 on the B200 SXM6. Texture mapping units are 128 versus 592, and render output units are 64 versus 24. The RX 7600 XT includes 32 ray tracing cores; the B200 SXM6 lists none. The B200 SXM6 has 592 tensor cores, while the RX 7600 XT has none recorded.

Power characteristics differ as well. The RX 7600 XT has a TDP of 190 W with a suggested PSU of 450 W and a dual-slot form factor. The B200 SXM6 has a TDP of 1000 W, a suggested PSU of 1400 W, and uses an SXM module slot width. The RX 7600 XT uses a 1x 8-pin power connector; the B200 SXM6 lists no power connectors. The RX 7600 XT interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8, while the B200 SXM6 uses PCIe 6.0 x16. Display outputs are present on the RX 7600 XT (1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1) and absent on the B200 SXM6.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7600 XT is built on RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The B200 SXM6 uses Blackwell architecture with the GB100 chip, part of the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation. It lists no API support in the database, showing N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan.

The RX 7600 XT's predecessor is Navi II and its successor is Navi IV. The B200 SXM6's predecessor is Server Hopper and its successor is Server Rubin. The RX 7600 XT delivers FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The B200 SXM6 delivers 69.34 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16. Pixel rates are 176.3 GPixel/s for the RX 7600 XT versus 43.92 GPixel/s for the B200 SXM6. Texture rates are 352.6 GTexel/s versus 1,083.4 GTexel/s.

The RX 7600 XT was released on 2024-01-23, and the B200 SXM6 on 2024-10-31. Both are listed as active in production. The RX 7600 XT is a dual-slot card measuring 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height; the B200 SXM6 has no recorded dimensions. The RX 7600 XT's launch MSRP is 329 USD.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the RX 7600 XT wins in every category where measurements exist. It has a complete benchmark suite, a measured average score, and a percentile ranking derived from real results. The B200 SXM6 has no wins to claim from the database, as its benchmark array is empty and its average score is zero.

The RX 7600 XT wins on consumer-facing features: it has display outputs, API support, a dual-slot form factor, and a 1x 8-pin power connector. The B200 SXM6 offers none of these, listing no display outputs and no API compatibility. The RX 7600 XT also wins on clock speeds, with higher base and boost clocks than the B200 SXM6.

The B200 SXM6 wins on raw specifications in several areas. It has more shading units (18944 versus 2048), more texture mapping units (592 versus 128), and more tensor cores (592 versus zero). Its memory capacity (180 GB versus 16 GB), bus width (8192-bit versus 128-bit), and bandwidth (8.19 TB/s versus 288.0 GB/s) are all far larger. Its FP32 and FP16 throughput (69.34 TFLOPS) exceeds the RX 7600 XT's 22.57 TFLOPS. Its transistor count and die size are also substantially larger.

The RX 7600 XT wins on pixel rate, delivering 176.3 GPixel/s versus the B200 SXM6's 43.92 GPixel/s. The B200 SXM6 wins on texture rate, reaching 1,083.4 GTexel/s versus 352.6 GTexel/s. The RX 7600 XT has more render output units (64 versus 24), while the B200 SXM6 has more shading units and TMUs.

In use-case terms, the RX 7600 XT is the only card with recorded benchmark evidence, so it wins on any workload the database can evaluate. The B200 SXM6's advantages are purely on paper, with no measured scores to confirm real-world behavior. The data shows a consumer-oriented GPU with full measurement coverage against a server module with none.